- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FSBDL Redd Rankings
Posted on 2/12/15 at 12:53 pm to GynoSandberg
Posted on 2/12/15 at 12:53 pm to GynoSandberg
Stop being such a yat G.
0
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:06 pm to GynoSandberg
someone tell me if im off here.
Out of our 12 scoring categories, IP is the only one that doesn't promote having successful players. Im just trying to understand how it falls in line with everything else we decided on.
Out of our 12 scoring categories, IP is the only one that doesn't promote having successful players. Im just trying to understand how it falls in line with everything else we decided on.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:09 pm to Lester Earl
It doesn't. We just drew a category out of a hat and tried to slip it by everyone without them noticing.
2/20 ain't bad.
2/20 ain't bad.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:10 pm to reddman
For the record, I voted for no-hitters as that last stat.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:12 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
IP is the only one that doesn't promote having successful players
I'm fairly certain that when you pitch someone it will also affect K/9, WHIP and ERA
Weak troll attempt, I give it a 4/10
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:13 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
For the record, I voted for no-hitters as that last stat.
I lost a matchup one time in my friends retarded points league because a no hitter was worth 70 points.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:14 pm to reddman
so is there a non smartass answer or what?
I never said anyone tried to slip it by me. I just think that had it been talked about, we might have came up with a better end result as a group.
I never said anyone tried to slip it by me. I just think that had it been talked about, we might have came up with a better end result as a group.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:17 pm to barry
quote:
I'm fairly certain that when you pitch someone it will also affect K/9, WHIP and ERA
That's what I was thinking. Steals probably has less of an affect on the other hitting categories than IP does for the pitching ones.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:19 pm to barry
quote:
I'm fairly certain that when you pitch someone it will also affect K/9, WHIP and ERA
Weak troll attempt, I give it a 4/10
It's a serious question, not a troll.
Those are all separate entities.
You can take any category separately, and say "I need a successful player in order to win this category". All other 11 categories fall under this. We even go to the point to subtract points for caught stealing.
IP is neutral at best. No team with a successful pitching week is going to chase IPs. But all the teams with shitty weeks surely will.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:20 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
I just think that had it been talked about, we might have came up with a better end result as a group.
Why would we think it needed to be talked about, if people had a problem they would have said something.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:20 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
so is there a non smartass answer or what?
Well, saying that "IP is the only one that doesn't promote having successful players" is befuddling. Innings = outs = success.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:21 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
IP is neutral at best. No team with a successful pitching week is going to chase IPs. But all the teams with shitty weeks surely will.
We spoke our word on why its a category. Discussion is over. Sorry.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:27 pm to barry
quote:
Why would we think it needed to be talked about, if people had a problem they would have said something.
This is a great way to run things
You should've set up the whole league without input
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:29 pm to LSUBoo
It's not as simple as getting outs.
If you have 50IP on the week, with a 5.50 ERA and lose every other pitching category except IP, is that successful? Because your team got 150 outs in a vacuum
No need for QS if all we're worried about is getting outs
If you have 50IP on the week, with a 5.50 ERA and lose every other pitching category except IP, is that successful? Because your team got 150 outs in a vacuum
No need for QS if all we're worried about is getting outs
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:31 pm to GynoSandberg
Are you serious? 5 agreed that it was the best policy and put it in. It was then proposed to the league. Not one person had an issue with it. Nobody even questioned it. It was right there on the first post for all to see. Get over it. Both of you.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:31 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
You should've set up the whole league without input
We had 25% of the league in the rules committee then we gave everyone ample oppurtunity to review the constitution. We aren't gonna hold everyones hands and go line by line with 20 people over the whole damn document.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:32 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
This is a great way to run things
You should've set up the whole league without input
I am not upset....at all G.
I want you to explain what you would like to happen in a perfect world.
Just curious
TBM were given every opportunity to know the rules before the draft and chose to assume they knew them.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:33 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
It's not as simple as getting outs.
If you have 50IP on the week, with a 5.50 ERA and lose every other pitching category except IP, is that successful? Because your team got 150 outs in a vacuum
No need for QS if all we're worried about is getting outs
The discussion is over. Let it die.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:34 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
It's not as simple as getting outs.
Sure it is.
quote:
If you have 50IP on the week, with a 5.50 ERA and lose every other pitching category except IP, is that successful?
Well, you would be successful at winning IP. Just like a team full of speedsters could win NSB every week at the expense of the other stats... I think that's a poor strategy, but that's really up to the manager.
quote:Well, then it's a good thing that's not all we're worried about, isn't it? There are 6 pitching stats, not 1. Approach it however you see fit.
No need for QS if all we're worried about is getting outs
ETA: Barry's right... time to let this die.
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:39 pm to LSUBoo
You can be successful at winning IP without having any successful players. That's my point
SBs isn't the best category to compare that to. Not only is it a skill but we are penalizing for getting caught.
The same way you get nothing if you don't get a QS start. Well, except for now you get rewarded simply for throwing an innings
We might as well make wins a category too.
SBs isn't the best category to compare that to. Not only is it a skill but we are penalizing for getting caught.
The same way you get nothing if you don't get a QS start. Well, except for now you get rewarded simply for throwing an innings
We might as well make wins a category too.
Page 10 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News