- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FSBDL Redd Rankings
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:37 am to GynoSandberg
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:37 am to GynoSandberg
no it isnt
Saves and Holds are separate in that league to make 6 cats
Saves and Holds are separate in that league to make 6 cats
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 10:38 am
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:37 am to reddman
I skipped over the scoring. I thought i had it figured out, but now that i think about it i guess i really didn't know the 6th pitching category. And if it was discussed in a thread, i clearly missed it.
I knew all along that we had a IP requirement, I never would have suspected the 6th category would have been IP.
Thankfully I would have drafted the same anyway. But it doesnt really make much sense, and seems forced just to find that 6th category.
I knew all along that we had a IP requirement, I never would have suspected the 6th category would have been IP.
Thankfully I would have drafted the same anyway. But it doesnt really make much sense, and seems forced just to find that 6th category.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:37 am to GynoSandberg
In HC it is:
OBP
TB
HR
RBI
SB-CS
Runs
ERA
WHIP
QS
K/9
Saves-BS
Holds
Didnt feel like separating saves and holds was an option in a 20 man league because the categories, especially saves would be spread really thin.
OBP
TB
HR
RBI
SB-CS
Runs
ERA
WHIP
QS
K/9
Saves-BS
Holds
Didnt feel like separating saves and holds was an option in a 20 man league because the categories, especially saves would be spread really thin.
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 10:38 am
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:37 am to GynoSandberg
It's not... the HC league uses HD and S-BS as two separate scoring stats. I hated it broken up like that.
And yeah, part of me is bitter than in the playoffs two seasons ago I had a set-up man blow a save and it cost me a matchup. I didn't even need any more holds, but blown holds isn't a stat.
And yeah, part of me is bitter than in the playoffs two seasons ago I had a set-up man blow a save and it cost me a matchup. I didn't even need any more holds, but blown holds isn't a stat.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:39 am to reddman
Oh well
I'll adjust. Just sucks I didn't catch that before as my pitching is pretty fricked now.
I'll adjust. Just sucks I didn't catch that before as my pitching is pretty fricked now.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:44 am to GynoSandberg
I don't mind the IP category. It prevents a team who loaded up on RPs from dominating the pitching statistics. And I say that as someone who used that strategy.
If you don't have at least two categories geared solely to SPs (like QS and IP), then RPs become overpowered and everyone in the league would have loaded up more on them. Especially in a 20 team league.
What other category would everyone liked to have seen in there that doesn't weaken the teams that drafted good SP staffs?
If you don't have at least two categories geared solely to SPs (like QS and IP), then RPs become overpowered and everyone in the league would have loaded up more on them. Especially in a 20 team league.
What other category would everyone liked to have seen in there that doesn't weaken the teams that drafted good SP staffs?
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 10:46 am
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:51 am to TTownTiger
quote:
t prevents a team who loaded up on RPs from dominating the pitching statistics. And I say that as someone who used that strategy.
that's what the 35IP or 6 starts requirement is for
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:52 am to TTownTiger
I honestly like the idea of making the option of making the Minimum innings and then sitting on your laurels a little less enticing.
In tdbl if your opponent has three guys go on Monday and they all deal...they pretty much just sit on that and win ERA, WHIP, and K/9
In tdbl if your opponent has three guys go on Monday and they all deal...they pretty much just sit on that and win ERA, WHIP, and K/9
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:52 am to Lester Earl
quote:
that's what the 35IP or 6 starts requirement is for
That's what reading the constitution before agreeing to it is for.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:57 am to PortCityTiger24
if you see anger in any of my posts you are searching in the wrong place.
Like searching in a thread for a league you quit on.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 10:58 am to TTownTiger
Naw man
35 innings or 6 starts insures you cannot load up on RP and get by
ERA and WHIP are also contingent on SPs doing the bulk of the work there, as well as QS (and IP now). Relievers are still an afterthought as they will soley get you one cat while giving you a slight bump elsewhere if they have good ratios. They help but they aren't going to win you pitching cats
35 innings or 6 starts insures you cannot load up on RP and get by
ERA and WHIP are also contingent on SPs doing the bulk of the work there, as well as QS (and IP now). Relievers are still an afterthought as they will soley get you one cat while giving you a slight bump elsewhere if they have good ratios. They help but they aren't going to win you pitching cats
Posted on 2/12/15 at 11:00 am to Lester Earl
quote:
that's what the 35IP or 6 starts requirement is for
Removing it would still weaken SPs and, depending on what category would replace it, give a team filled with RPs more of an advantage. It all depends on what would be replacing that category.
Look at my team. I drafted my pitching staff knowing I'd be punting 2 pitching categories each week. If IP wasn't there, that's one of the categories I was punting, my staff of RPs just got stronger unless you replace the IP category with one that's geared solely towards SP. But if you replace it with a category that RPs can compete in, then that now gives me 5 categories to compete in each week and I'd only be punting one.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 11:05 am to RollDatRoll
quote:
What do you have available for an arm, MWG?
Michael Saunders
A nice player that provides a little bit of both pop and speed.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 11:07 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
35 innings or 6 starts insures you cannot load up on RP and get by
I am confident enough to roll my top 3 SPs out for the majority of their starts and let my 6-7 RPs pick up 10-15 innings each week. We'll see if 35 IP is enough to dilute the ratio's of my RPs enough that they wont matter as much.
Edit: I'm obviously hoping that 35 IP isn't enough to weaken RPs,
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 11:10 am
Posted on 2/12/15 at 11:13 am to TTownTiger
6 starts/35 IP mean you basically need 6 good SPs to compete in pitching. In a 20 team league, that is already putting a heavy priority on SPs. Even if you said each team needs 5 good SPs, you are looking at the top 100 SPs being extremely valuable.
Now on top of that, you are throwing IP out there as another cat people have to chase. You are almost forcing people to go out and pitch Aaron Harangs on a Sunday if they have a shot at winning IP. That's silly if you ask me
Now on top of that, you are throwing IP out there as another cat people have to chase. You are almost forcing people to go out and pitch Aaron Harangs on a Sunday if they have a shot at winning IP. That's silly if you ask me
Posted on 2/12/15 at 11:14 am to GynoSandberg
Not going to lie.
I thought the IP minimum was 30.
I'm freaking out now
I thought the IP minimum was 30.
I'm freaking out now
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 11:15 am
Posted on 2/12/15 at 11:15 am to GynoSandberg
its done bro
the time to argue this was 2 weeks ago
the time to argue this was 2 weeks ago
Posted on 2/12/15 at 11:15 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
6 starts/35 IP mean you basically need 6 good SPs to compete in pitching
This is absolutely false. Not one team has 6 GOOD SPs.
Popular
Back to top



0





