- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:03 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
I don't want or expect any resolution? I don't understand what you're fishing for here
I understand it's done. I'm just discussing the rule. What's the big deal? I can only imagine the gchat convos
Unlike Barry and Redd, I want to know what you want to achieve so we can resolve it.
ETA: If the nature of the convo isn't aimed at some sort of resolution then I don't need to be here anymore
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:06 pm to rondo
What are the options for a resolution so I can pick one to answer your question?
I assumed we were discussing the IP scoring cat since we didn't talk about it week ago. Not looking for anything else
I assumed we were discussing the IP scoring cat since we didn't talk about it week ago. Not looking for anything else
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:07 pm to RollDatRoll
quote:
Sorry to interrupt WhineFest 2015, but would anyone be interested in Napoli?
Not unless he reports with pitchers and catchers.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:07 pm to rondo
I understand it wanting to be different, but the main goal has always been to reward quality over quantity. Remeber how the scoring in those other leagues evolved from the 1st league?
All other 11 categories reward quality. If I sat hear and asked you to explain to me the value of having SLG as a category, or K:9, I have confidence you could do that, and it would be settled in 2 posts.
Certainly wouldn't be 4 pages of derp, "let it die" bullshite. Not trying to get people defensive, it's not even about me missing that poll. Throw that all out the window, a simple explanation would be nice. Cause it totally contradicts every other category
All other 11 categories reward quality. If I sat hear and asked you to explain to me the value of having SLG as a category, or K:9, I have confidence you could do that, and it would be settled in 2 posts.
Certainly wouldn't be 4 pages of derp, "let it die" bullshite. Not trying to get people defensive, it's not even about me missing that poll. Throw that all out the window, a simple explanation would be nice. Cause it totally contradicts every other category
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:11 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
What are the options for a resolution so I can pick one to answer your question?
As far as I can tell there is no option other than to accept what's happened and move on.
18 teams knew this was a category and drafted with that knowledge.
Changing the rule would be a bad move in just about everyone's opinion.
TBH, I didnt draft with any intention of IP being a cat I chase after. I knew it existed though.
quote:
I assumed we were discussing the IP scoring cat since we didn't talk about it week ago.
And I ask again...whats the point in discussing a rule that cannot be changed.
Thats like arguing that you don't think gravity should exist because you didnt know it existed and it makes falling hurt. You aren't Wile E Coyote bro
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:14 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
I understand it wanting to be different, but the main goal has always been to reward quality over quantity. Remeber how the scoring in those other leagues evolved from the 1st league?
All other 11 categories reward quality. If I sat hear and asked you to explain to me the value of having SLG as a category, or K:9, I have confidence you could do that, and it would be settled in 2 posts.
Certainly wouldn't be 4 pages of derp, "let it die" bullshite. Not trying to get people defensive, it's not even about me missing that poll. Throw that all out the window, a simple explanation would be nice. Cause it totally contradicts every other category
Man I was pretty passive in setting up the 12 cats we would use. As far as I could tell it was used so that Saves + Holds could be a cat. In HCMDL I HATE that they are separate. Owning a guy solely for the purposes of holds is bullshite.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:14 pm to rondo
I have to say... this is the first time I've seen this side of you rondo. So use to seeing you call everyone a fgt and whatnot. Very different. 
What y'all should do is create a board space for either of those two. So for future rule discussion/changes, there will be no confusion and they'd have a hand in it as well. Other than that, the rules are set and we've already drafted. It's pretty much deal with it time.
But y'all keep bitching, we don't have anything else to yap about... the season is only 2 months away.
What y'all should do is create a board space for either of those two. So for future rule discussion/changes, there will be no confusion and they'd have a hand in it as well. Other than that, the rules are set and we've already drafted. It's pretty much deal with it time.
But y'all keep bitching, we don't have anything else to yap about... the season is only 2 months away.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:15 pm to papz
When I am not calling people idiots and fgts I can be useful in conflict resolution
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:18 pm to rondo
I think I've told you directly 5 times I'm not pushing for it to be changed
You're acting like rules are never discussed after they are put in place
You're acting like rules are never discussed after they are put in place
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:19 pm to rondo
quote:
Man I was pretty passive in setting up the 12 cats we would use. As far as I could tell it was used so that Saves + Holds could be a cat. In HCMDL I HATE that they are separate. Owning a guy solely for the purposes of holds is bullshite.
Agreed, that's pretty much exactly how it went down. My comment then was the same as it is now, I've never used IP as a scoring stat, but I like the strategy involved and if that's the best stat that gets us to a 6x6 without having to separate SV and HD then I'm all for it.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:20 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
I think I've told you directly 5 times I'm not pushing for it to be changed
And I have asked you 5 times what you want to come of discussing it.
I can see that it is nothing.
I'm out.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:24 pm to LSUBoo
Boo, you really need to step up man. So far the committee is a bunch of hardasses.
And before Rondo gives me a tough time, I am an advisor to RolldatRoll's team.
And before Rondo gives me a tough time, I am an advisor to RolldatRoll's team.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:26 pm to PortCityTiger24
Is this where I'm supposed to tell you to frick off, quitter?
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:27 pm to LSUBoo
Not unless I say something bad about drinking beer.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:29 pm to PortCityTiger24
Dammit. The truth is out now.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:30 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
Not unless I say something bad about drinking beer.
That would really hinge on which beer you are bad mouthing.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:33 pm to rondo
It's actually been productive. Some people discussed why its a good category to implement. There was good cases brought up on both sides
If you could just agree with me that, in the future, we can run any rule changes by the league via the board, and I will agree to read over the rules diligently. Thoughts?
If you could just agree with me that, in the future, we can run any rule changes by the league via the board, and I will agree to read over the rules diligently. Thoughts?
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:34 pm to GynoSandberg
He said he's out. Don't petition to get that shitbird back in here.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:34 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
That would really hinge on which beer you are bad mouthing.
Let's stick with the theme of the thread: Papps.
Page 12 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News