- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ivermectin is the corona killer- Joe Rogan and Doctors discuss
Posted on 7/18/21 at 11:47 am
Posted on 7/18/21 at 11:47 am
Spotify - Joe Rogan show June 22nd
Apologies if this has been posted and discussed. It’s been out a while. First time I have listened though. Thought I’d share for others like me.
Long but informative
Primarily about the deliberate disregard for ivermectin and the reasons why
Criminal how this has been politicized.
Many of these professionals should be jailed for their role in allowing this shite to still exist.
Apologies if this has been posted and discussed. It’s been out a while. First time I have listened though. Thought I’d share for others like me.
Long but informative
Primarily about the deliberate disregard for ivermectin and the reasons why
Criminal how this has been politicized.
Many of these professionals should be jailed for their role in allowing this shite to still exist.
Posted on 7/18/21 at 12:19 pm to prplngldtigr
Yep - Ivermectin KILLS all Corona viruses.
The fake vaccines might keep you from feeling ill.
The fake vaccines might keep you from feeling ill.
Posted on 7/18/21 at 12:27 pm to prplngldtigr
Yeah, I posted it last month. Everyone needs to listen to it.
Posted on 7/18/21 at 12:58 pm to prplngldtigr
Posted on 7/18/21 at 12:59 pm to prplngldtigr
It was posted. Still good to post again.
Posted on 7/18/21 at 1:08 pm to prplngldtigr
So if an unvaccinated person gets exposed should they get on this stuff immediately? From a doctor of course.
Trying to better understand the steps upon known exposure to when you first getting symptoms. This is what has pissed me off about all of this. These Covid doctors have done nothing to promote fighting it in the early stages. "get tested and we'll know in 5 or so days". This approach killed tens of thousands
Trying to better understand the steps upon known exposure to when you first getting symptoms. This is what has pissed me off about all of this. These Covid doctors have done nothing to promote fighting it in the early stages. "get tested and we'll know in 5 or so days". This approach killed tens of thousands
This post was edited on 7/18/21 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 7/18/21 at 1:21 pm to prplngldtigr
I'm sure I know the answer...but is there a version on different site? For some reason it won't open unless I download the Spotify app
Posted on 7/18/21 at 1:54 pm to prplngldtigr
Fauci and anyone opposing or who opposed use of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine should be put on trial for mass murder. Not kidding.
Posted on 7/18/21 at 2:19 pm to prplngldtigr
I received a positive diagnosis for COVID on Thursday. I was prescribed ivermectin, azithromycin (z-pak), and prednisone along with other vitamins and common OTC meds. My symptoms have been very minor (low grade fever, minor sinus congestion).
I know others that tested positive recently have had a much rougher go with it and I don’t
think they were prescribed any of these medications.
It may be anecdotal, and I know that I am not out of the woods yet, but I’m a believer in the drugs I was prescribed.
I know others that tested positive recently have had a much rougher go with it and I don’t
think they were prescribed any of these medications.
It may be anecdotal, and I know that I am not out of the woods yet, but I’m a believer in the drugs I was prescribed.
Posted on 7/18/21 at 2:23 pm to prplngldtigr
Heard yesterday Ivermectin is highly effective fighting cancer too!
It’s truly criminal muffling the effectiveness of this drug, it’s as criminal as committing mass murder
It’s truly criminal muffling the effectiveness of this drug, it’s as criminal as committing mass murder
Posted on 7/18/21 at 2:59 pm to prplngldtigr
Some of the original research looks shaky:
Huge study supporting ivermectin as Covid treatment withdrawn over ethical concerns
Huge study supporting ivermectin as Covid treatment withdrawn over ethical concerns
Posted on 7/18/21 at 3:10 pm to prplngldtigr
The way the left has politicized ivermectin and Hydroxy is nothing short of criminal. People should go down hard over this
Posted on 7/18/21 at 3:11 pm to prplngldtigr
It’s what my Dr gave me and it kicked Corona’s arse while it was kicking mine.
Posted on 7/18/21 at 3:21 pm to prplngldtigr
From the prior thread about this:
Follow the money
A big part of the argument against certain treatments (that get people banned from platforms for discussing...) appears to be that “the evidence is low quality” (mind you compared to big dollar pharma trials hyping new biotech for $$$$ vs. an option that is cheap with little profit margin)
Read this recently and immediately thought of the irony it presents (level of evidence argument)
https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/93430?xid=nl_secondopinion_2021-07-06&eun=g1803593d0r
This theme shows up in the Ivermectin discussion
Cynics claim the data is not good enough (low volume/low quality)
For those paying attention
Unknown unknowns, black swans, and turkeys bruh...
Follow the money
A big part of the argument against certain treatments (that get people banned from platforms for discussing...) appears to be that “the evidence is low quality” (mind you compared to big dollar pharma trials hyping new biotech for $$$$ vs. an option that is cheap with little profit margin)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbanghead.gif)
Read this recently and immediately thought of the irony it presents (level of evidence argument)
https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/93430?xid=nl_secondopinion_2021-07-06&eun=g1803593d0r
quote:
Is Confirmation Bias Guiding COVID Vaccine Recommendations? — Policy must be based on indisputable evidence
by Robert M. Kaplan, PhD, and Rose McDermott, PhD July 6, 2021
quote:
Let's examine how the confirmation bias tendency has played out in the evaluation of studies in support of vaccines. For example, within days of a suggestion of increased myocarditis following vaccination among young Israeli men, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, MD, MPH, ignored evidence in the CDC's own surveillance systems and leaped to the conclusion that vaccines posed no threat. But now, FDA has added a warning about the risk for myocarditis after vaccination with the mRNA shots, and CDC agreed to update their fact sheet.
NIH Director Francis Collins, MD, PhD, who by anyone's standards is a model of personal and scientific integrity, published a blog with the title, "Studies Confirm COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Safe, Effective for Pregnant Women." The evidence was based on two studies. One of the studies included only 30 pregnant women and did not measure outcomes in terms of maternal or child health. The small sample size is an issue. Imagine concluding that maternal age is unrelated to trisomy 21 based on 30 women ages 35 to 40. Down syndrome, which occurs in about eight per 1,000 live births for 40-year-old moms, would most likely be overlooked. The second study included just 84 vaccinated women who had given birth. Examinations showed the placentas from these births were comparable to those from a group of women who had not been vaccinated. These two studies, comprising a total of 114 pregnancies, were then generalized to all women and to birth outcomes rather than surrogate measures of immunity or placental pathology.
Evidence used to reassure men may be even weaker. In June, JAMA published a study that was designed to determine whether mRNA vaccines diminish fertility. The investigation included a grand total of 45 young (median age 28) volunteers. Semen was collected pre- and post-vaccination. There was a modest increase in sperm concentration, motility, and semen volume following the vaccine. No data on pregnancies, live births, or neonatal complications were available. MedPage Today reported the results under the heading, "Hopeful Dads Can Relax About COVID Vax: No Link to Infertility." A quote from the senior author diminished the methodological limitations: "...even though the 45 number is small, we're confident that we can generalize this to the rest of the population." He went further to express confidence that the Johnson & Johnson and Novavax vaccines, which were not evaluated in the study, would similarly not affect sperm counts. Urology Times reported, "Study shows COVID-19 vaccines do not affect male fertility" without raising a single question about methodological limitations. CNN, under the headline "Sperm count not harmed by Covid-19 vaccine, study says," quoted several experts who reassured men that the study removes any concern about vaccine effects on fertility. Yet, these small studies exert outsize influence because JAMA publications often get extensive media attention.
quote:
Now, let's do a thought experiment. Suppose the study showed a decrease in sperm concentration or motility after the vaccine. Would JAMA have accepted the paper? Or would reviewers have said: 1) there were only 45 subjects, 2) it used a convenience sample that is unrepresentative of the U.S. population of men, 3) there was no control group, 4) the outcomes were surrogate markers, not actual measures of reproductive success, and 5) follow-up was limited to 70 days after the second dose. The list goes on. The concern, of course, is that confirmation bias is at work.
JAMA upholds very high methodological standards for papers that challenge the dominant narrative. But for studies that reinforce the prevailing wisdom ... not so much. To be fair, we are not aware of any evidence that vaccines adversely affect fertility. But we need more time and evidence to affirm the vaccines have no effect on birth outcomes. That is why Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and CDC have remained cautious -- CDC says pregnant women can get vaccinated and should discuss any questions with a healthcare provider; NIH also just launched a study to learn more about the vaccine in pregnant women.
This theme shows up in the Ivermectin discussion
Cynics claim the data is not good enough (low volume/low quality)
For those paying attention
Unknown unknowns, black swans, and turkeys bruh...
Posted on 7/18/21 at 6:24 pm to prplngldtigr
If a third of what was covered in that podcast is true then people should be picking up the pitchforks.
FWIW it is definitely given at our hospital by several doctors but it doesn’t seem to be the miracle drug they tout it as for covid. But it has definitely helped some patients. Just doesn’t seem like it’s this across the board covid killer for everyone.
FWIW it is definitely given at our hospital by several doctors but it doesn’t seem to be the miracle drug they tout it as for covid. But it has definitely helped some patients. Just doesn’t seem like it’s this across the board covid killer for everyone.
This post was edited on 7/18/21 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 7/18/21 at 8:37 pm to prplngldtigr
Bump to help wake people up to cures they fight to keep away from the public.
Posted on 7/18/21 at 8:54 pm to prplngldtigr
Here’s a good discussion with the same doctor who’s talking with another “real” doctor about the benefits of ivermectin
Doctors discussing the undeniable benefits of ivermectin
Doctors discussing the undeniable benefits of ivermectin
Posted on 7/18/21 at 9:18 pm to prplngldtigr
Dr. Fauci was told in MARCH 2020 ivermectin would drop cases and deaths by 84%
it is in his emails.
he buried that information.
he should be put on trial for crimes against humanity
it is in his emails.
he buried that information.
he should be put on trial for crimes against humanity
Posted on 7/19/21 at 7:01 am to prplngldtigr
It must really kill Spotify to have him affiliated.... ??
Posted on 7/19/21 at 7:06 am to prplngldtigr
This is actually really good that he is tackling issues the Left hates. Not letting them live in their echo chamber.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)