re: spike proteins express themselves both in the placenta and the testes.

quote:

---

Why don’t you read the study, L&D nurse?

---

Read it.... Just read it AGAIN
Is there something in there that is supposed to be a positive for pregnant women or those hoping to be preganat in the future? Or, the offspring of a placenta filled with spike proteins? My kids got this shite against my wishes because that electronic babysitter in their hands told them to do it or be branded as SELFISH frickS. My daughter wants children more than anything. Nothing in this article is positive for anybody of childbearing age. YOU NEED TO READ IT YOURSELF.

quote:

---

Are you locking yourself up and hiding from infection?

If not, would you rather catch something made in a Chinese lab or an American lab

---

Hey Tiguar... Fauci holds a patent for mRNA vaccine... Chew on the potential conflicts in that statement....! His wife was a public official instrumental in mRNA Covid vaccine being allowed for emergency use. 5 new BILLIONAIRES have been created by the worldwide use of this experimental horseshite AND the manufacturers cannot be held liable if it is proven harmful in time...
WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG?

quote:

---

Your the frickin quack looser

---

Illiterate

Covid is No Bueno for the Brain

Well on the plus side your vaccinated kids will likely not contract a disease that appears to cause neurological damage. So that’s a positive.

Being concerned about a new vaccine is legitimate. However, the evidence of negative outcomes from a covid infection is quite robust, whereas the evidence of negative outcomes from a covid vaccine is quite speculative. At this moment in time, fearing the vaccine more than an infection is fearing ghosts more than reality. It’s an irrational position to take.

The govt has experimented with segments of its population since the beginning of time.
When they are doing a million dollar lottery to get folks to take the vaccine, alarms should be ringing.

quote:

---

L&D Nurse here

---

Well that would explain why you missed the study published in this week's edition of JAMA.

quote:

---

study of sperm parameters before and after 2 doses of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, there were no significant decreases in any sperm parameter among this small cohort of healthy men. Because the vaccines contain mRNA and not the live virus, it is unlikely that the vaccine would affect sperm parameters

---

Yes this was a small cohort and yes the research into male fertility is still limited. However, there has been no scientific evidence discovered to date to back up the hypothesis that the covid vaccine affects male fertility. So the concerns about male infertility appear to not be a thing at this point.

Female fertility has been studied more extensively than male fertility. I will let MDs at John Hopkins explain it for you.

quote:

---

No, getting the COVID-19 vaccine will not affect your fertility. Women actively trying to conceive may be vaccinated with the current COVID-19 vaccines — there is no reason to delay pregnancy after completing the vaccine series.

Confusion around this issue arose when a false report surfaced on social media, saying that the spike protein on this coronavirus was the same as another spike protein called syncitin-1 that is involved in the growth and attachment of the placenta during pregnancy. The false report said that getting the COVID-19 vaccine would cause a woman’s body to fight this different spike protein and affect her fertility. The two spike proteins are completely different, and getting the COVID-19 vaccine will not affect the fertility of women who are seeking to become pregnant, including through in vitro fertilization methods. During the Pfizer vaccine tests, 23 women volunteers involved in the study became pregnant, and the only one in the trial who suffered a pregnancy loss had not received the actual vaccine, but a placebo.

---

Here is just one of the many studies that so far have found no evidence of antibodies attacking the placenta or causing problems with breast feeding.

quote:

---

Results Fifteen consented participants (mean age 40.4 years, various ethnicities) who received at least one dose of BNT162B2, including five breast-feeding women and two women who were inadvertently vaccinated in early pregnancy, were recruited. BNT162B2 mRNA, detected by amplifying part of the spike-encoding region, was detected in plasma 1-4 days following the first dose (n=13), but not 4-5 weeks later (n=2), nor was the mRNA isolated from aqueous or lipid breast milk fractions collected 0-7 days post-vaccination (n=5). Vaccine recipients demonstrated strong SARS-CoV-2 neutralising activity by at least four weeks after the first dose (n=15), including the two pregnant women. None had placental anti-syncytin-1 binding antibodies at either time-point following vaccination.

---

So basically you are

quote:

---

What puzzles me are the people that express concern about the unknown, long term risks of the vaccine but seem unperturbed by the equally unknown, long term risks of an actual infection.

---

You make sense until your conclusion. Yes, there may be long-term damage with both the virus and the vaccine. The sensible approach would be to avoid both. The risk from the immediate effects of the virus is small.

quote:

---

All had taken the vaccine — I am not clear as to the timing of the vaccine related to pregnancy but those aren’t normal odds

---

It is something to think about if the timing is as you say it is. But miscarriages are incredibly common. Upwards of 50% of all fertilization events end in spontaneous abortion.

quote:

---

Is there something in there that is supposed to be a positive for pregnant women or those hoping to be preganat in the future? Or, the offspring of a placenta filled with spike proteins?

---

Folks in this thread should consider this Tiguar statement:

"We’ve come full circle from laughing at long term effects of COVID to shitting ourselves at long term effects of a vaccine for COVID."

It is a salient observation.

----------------------------

As an L&D Nurse there are a couple of facts you should be aware of.
(1) ACOG recommends vaccination.
(2) ACOG finds no evidence whatsoever of vaccine associated teratogenicity or reproductive interference.
(3) There is scant evidence of ANY vaccine generated s-protein getting to the ovaries and/or placenta in humans. Concern there is derived from rat studies with a 500-fold overdose of vaccine.
(4) There is no evidence of a postulated anti-Syncytin response occurring in humans.
(5) There is evidence severity of CV19 increases with pregnancy, placing parturients at higher risk if they contract Covid-19.
(6) In contrast with vaccine-generated s-protein, during CV19 infection systemic spike protein is present including significant amounts in both ovaries and placenta.

Here are some ACOG takeaways:

quote:

---

• Pregnancy testing should not be a requirement prior to receiving any EUA-approved COVID-19 vaccine.

• Importantly, claims linking COVID-19 vaccines to infertility are unfounded and have no scientific evidence supporting them. ACOG recommends vaccination for all eligible people who may consider future pregnancy.

• ACOG strongly recommends that all eligible persons receive a COVID-19 vaccine or vaccine series, depending on the product. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other women’s health care practitioners should lead by example by being vaccinated and encouraging eligible patients to be vaccinated as well.

---