Started By
Message

A healthy Matthew Beck

Posted on 5/2/21 at 2:08 pm
Posted by LesnarF5
Member since Apr 2015
9219 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 2:08 pm
May have been the difference this year in 3-5 games. That was IMO devastating not having him available this year.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47154 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 2:25 pm to
Yeah. Beck being injured and Hill going down has cost us a handful of games.
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26367 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 2:27 pm to
Definitely--that hurt.

Beck's Prime: > Edwards, >> Fontenot, >>> the rest.

Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278794 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 2:33 pm to
No
Posted by Yippie_Ky_yae
Member since Jun 2019
3808 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 3:35 pm to
He doesn’t bat, so I don’t think he would of helped the offense.
Posted by Leon Spinks
Texas
Member since Aug 2016
2269 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 3:43 pm to
Beck is not good
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34246 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 3:47 pm to
With the idiotic tendencies regarding bull pen usage, I doubt Beck would have made a meaningful difference.
Posted by Mrtommorrow1987
Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2008
13152 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 3:52 pm to
That and not relying on Hilliard at all
Posted by Jack Daniel
In the bottle
Member since Feb 2013
25582 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 4:23 pm to
Beck wasn’t even supposed to be on this team so to use his loss as an excuse for Paul is bullshite.
Posted by Coater
Madison, MS
Member since Jun 2005
33079 posts
Posted on 5/2/21 at 7:12 pm to
I don’t know. I don’t remember Beck having very many stress-free outings
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram