Started By
Message
locked post

Why doesn't CPM try using an opener?

Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:27 am
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
11672 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:27 am
Obviously we don't have anyone that can close games out, and Marceaux and Labas can't go 9 innings every weekend. Why not try to get the first 1-3 innings on Friday and Saturday with some of your "relievers" when they'll be under less pressure and then let Marceaux and Labas come in to pitch the rest of the game? If we get into too big of a hole early in the game on Friday or Saturday then you just save Marceaux/Labas for Sunday instead.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75881 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:28 am to
That's a strategy employed when your bullpen is better than your starters.

That's not the issue we're having.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
53911 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:29 am to
Well Bianco gets the start in Oxford at 2B

I would start Fontenot in Game 3 and see how long he can go
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
19657 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:31 am to
Bianco getting the start tonight is truly a sign of Mainieri making his final lap.
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
51922 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:33 am to
Do you think he would be starting if it wasn’t OM?
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
11672 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:35 am to
quote:

That's a strategy employed when your bullpen is better than your starters.

That's not the issue we're having.

Typically. But the biggest issue we're having is finishing games off. I'd rather have Marceaux or Labas with 70-80 pitches behind them in the 9th than any of our other options right now
Posted by BigRaggedyTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
537 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:37 am to
You don't think asking a relief pitcher to start is adding pressure?
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lakewood Colorado
Member since Sep 2017
32085 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:39 am to
I was about to say the same. Pressure is equal ,but one type of pressure they are used to ,and the other type they are not.
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lakewood Colorado
Member since Sep 2017
32085 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:40 am to
That's something that's not done in college .I'm sure theres a reason it's not done
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75881 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Do you think he would be starting if it wasn’t OM?


No, which only highlights the level of decision making going on with Mainieri at a time we can't afford to punt on games.
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
11672 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:41 am to
Its definitely less pressure than asking him to close out a 3-1 game. Especially when he knows he only needs to go one time through the order. I thought the reason MLB teams started using openers was to get through the top of the lineup. We'd obviously be using it for a different reason, to keep as much of the game in Marceaux and Labas' hands as possible
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75881 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 8:41 am to
quote:

That's something that's not done in college .I'm sure theres a reason it's not done


Florida did it recently.
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
19657 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Do you think he would be starting if it wasn’t OM?


As Project said, no.
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
51922 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 9:18 am to
I’m thinking he starts tonight & that’s it but then again not many of his decisions have made sense
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
19657 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 9:20 am to
quote:

I’m thinking he starts tonight & that’s it but then again not many of his decisions have made sense


Oh I agree. It's one thing to send him out in game 3, but the first night when you are in a must win situation it looks terrible (much like the entire season).
This post was edited on 4/22/21 at 9:20 am
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
81952 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 9:21 am to
Who tf knows. The decision making has been baffling this year. Wouldnt surprise me if he had started if we played arkansas this weekend
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87186 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 9:21 am to
It's Bianco's last chance to start in a place he grew up. PM knows this season is over so he's throwing the player (and dad) a bone. It's a nice gesture and at this point, I don't care either way. We aren't making a regional anyway.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75881 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Especially when he knows he only needs to go one time through the order.


I really wish we started focusing on developing guys this way. Making sure they could handle multiple innings and looking at it as times through the order vs number of innings.

quote:

I thought the reason MLB teams started using openers was to get through the top of the lineup. We'd obviously be using it for a different reason, to keep as much of the game in Marceaux and Labas' hands as possible


From a times through the order lens, it could definitely makes sense. You use an opener to get through the top 4-6 batters. So for instance Labas enters the game and first batter he faces is the 7th hitter. He could go two full times through the order and be right back at the bottom of the lineup which could extend his outing.

I didn't use Marceaux as an example because he's not really having issues facing a lineup multiple times. Labas isn't all that bad with it either, so I still don't think it's something that would be necessary outside of Sundays.

But Sundays are really where we should be looking at it. Let's say Hellmers goes out and gets through the order once and is in the bottom of the third. Bring in a guy that's been okay in short bursts and might be able to strand runners, like *gasp* Alex Brady. Then start the next inning with the next guy that can face 9 hitters.

I actually like the idea of an opener and especially using our staff in a more progressive way. I just don't think it's a necessity with Marceaux or Labas. And I don't have a ton of confidence in the coaching staff to manage it properly.
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
16529 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 9:35 am to
With only two legit starters, if we have to resort to quirky things like that we are really screwed.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
20108 posts
Posted on 4/22/21 at 10:29 am to
Ain't no easy way out.

We have two reliable roles (starters LM and AJ) and everybody else is a big question mark. Fontenot is the biggest disappointment on our team. He should be a reliable closer but he's proven the contrary.

I would consider using Fontenot as a middle reliever and approach it from a managed innings point of view. If our starter struggles early, bring in Fontenot. If he has his A-game, then he can give us a lot of innings.

And if not, we can manage the wreck better.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram