re: How does the Left take over everything?

Because you are witnessing the endgame of a 100 year long Marxist coup that has infiltrated every facet of American culture. It has been death by a thousand cuts.

Sadly they've convinced a lot of people on our side to play nice, be weak and not fight back least you offend the people who hate you.

quote:

---

The FBI take over can be explained by them hiring only people with college degrees

---

They’ve been hiring this way for years. It was when they became PC and recruited “diversity” to fill field agent jobs.

Because they scheme while conservatives are working and raising kids

I disagree. Plenty of companies only hire those with degrees, and plenty of companies aren’t overrun with leftist scum. It’s more mindset, where someone is from, and their family history. A shite ton of kids raised in a home without a father turn out to be pieces of shite. Not all, but a shite ton. Being raised by a single mom more often than not leads to a kid being a bleeding heart liberal. The overwhelming large number of split families today due to divorce has negatively impacted our moral fabric. I’m not religious, but the decline of families attending church regularly hasn’t helped matters. For those families that do attend church, the number of “woke” churches is an issue. The “every kid gets a trophy” mentality has caused damage, and the “every kid has to go to college“ bullshite has screwed us as much as anything. Once the pieces of shite in DC decided that they could legislate higher education, it went downhill quickly. Social fricking media...maybe the most influential in degrading society in general. My point, it’s a lot of things. The FBI has always required a college degree to be an agent, but they haven’t always been staffed from to top to bottom with leftist scum.

Media and social media is a very influential ally and can even help steal an election for the Presidency of the U.S.

They whine too much. It ends up breaking the will of everyone.

Times change and the values of a society will reflect that change. Perhaps you have stagnated politically and ideologically. I'm not saying you're wrong and that I'm right, I'm simply laying out there is an equally logical explanation for what you have observed.

An interesting exercise would be to define in what ways societies values are no longer aligned with your own. Which areas are expressions of a movement towards greater freedom for the individual and which areas are oppressive?

Like the gender debate: personally, I don't care how people identify. That's more freedom for the individual in their pursuit of happiness. I am against indoctrination tactics being used to compel others to identify people in a given way. Deplatforming is censorship, even when it's a "private" company (there is no such thing as a private internet company as the U.S. government still maintains control of the internet and it was paid for by taxpayers, Google, Twitter, etc have all been funded by DARPA funds and are government institutions).

Or racism: personally, I'm against it and do my best to view people individually based upon their actions and to a lesser extent their public persona. But, I'll defend the right for a racist to say whatever they like and share a platform with them because the marketplace of ideas will determine who people prefer to talk to. It shows a lack of confidence in ones position when they attempt to gag dissenting opinions.

Or gun control: banning guns outright, or certain types, might lower gun violence eventually, but the rights afforded us under the constitution are only legitimate if we can hold them. Someone is always trying to infringe upon one of our rights. The threat of violence inherent in a populace being armed is a natural deterrent to radical governments. I'm sure, it would be easier for THEM if the populace was unarmed to infringe on rights and abuse their authority, but I'm not willing to give them the opportunity. And "trust me" from the government is a line of b.s. that should always be rejected.

I consider myself liberal in the classical sense, but hold some "conservative" ideologies also in the classical sense of the word.