Started By
Message
locked post

I’m torn on lonzo now

Posted on 2/10/21 at 5:41 am
Posted by Louisianabound88
BR
Member since Dec 2016
3621 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 5:41 am
Do we still trade him? If we do his value is way up. Or do we hope he continues his aggressive play? This Lonzo can take us places. If someone is willing to overpay then I would trade him, but I’m not ready to give him away for a bag of chips like 2 weeks ago
Posted by SulphursFinest
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2015
11339 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 6:24 am to
If you can get a good trade, if not,

Let Lonzo BALL
Posted by Fox McCloud
Member since Oct 2020
3525 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 6:25 am to
You trade him because he only plays when he’s about to be traded. Can’t count on his full effort year round.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
127803 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 6:27 am to
I’m pretty convinced at this point he will not be traded. Griffin is a supreme optimist and with Lonzo playing as well as he is, Griff will believe that Zo has finally been unlocked and want to keep him long term.

Rich Paul will make sure that Griffin believes they can resign him. And then Rich Paul will do Rich Paul things.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20625 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 6:31 am to
He’s been on a nice run, but consistency has always been the issue with him. I’d definitely wait until closer to the deadline. If the starting 5 continues to gel the way it has lately and lonzo continues playing well, then I’d be hard pressed to move him.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20669 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 6:36 am to
I think that Griffin makes a real play for Bradley Beal, and I think that Lonzo's improved play makes that trade more likely.

But I still don't think that a Beal trade is likely.

I dunno. I think that Griffin wants to move Lonzo, but he's only going to do it if he can clearly win the trade.
Posted by tigerbait3488
River Ridge
Member since Dec 2007
11348 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 6:39 am to
You absolutely trade him while he is playing this well. He will go back to being the Lonzo we have seen the last 2 seasons soon enough.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23373 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 6:45 am to
Well a future backcourt of Lonzo, NAW, and Kira could be nice if Lonzo stays consistent.
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25745 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 7:28 am to
It's a crapshoot. The safe bet is probably trade him now while his value is high. Doesn't mean he wants to leave or if we want to move him tho - who knows.

What is a player comp for Lonzo once he's reached his peak? A better version of Marcus Smart? I feel like that would be an nice piece to have but I can live without it...
This post was edited on 2/10/21 at 7:30 am
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 7:32 am to
A lot of people are saying we need our 3rd banana to be a guy who can guard 3 positions effectively and knock down open looks created by BI and Zion. That's exactly what Zion is. Since we've started playing through BI and Zion, Lonzo's efficiency is very high.

We don't need him to be John Stockton. This roster is not set up for a floor general like that. While a lot of his recent success could be a small sample illusion, I am liking the fit a lot more with how we're playing now.
Posted by Eman5805
West Bank
Member since Nov 2010
5098 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 7:32 am to
I’m not. He was never a bad player. But I just don’t see him becoming the finisher at the rim we need. It’s about mentality and that’s the one thing you can’t change. Not easily.

I just don’t see him becoming a player worth the contract he’s sure to demand. Besides...in just what? 11 games of action? I’ve seen more I like from Kira in vital areas than Lonzo ever did. He’s need to literally become the player he’s been these last few games for the rest of his career to make me reassess.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 7:38 am to
quote:

He will go back to being the Lonzo we have seen the last 2 seasons soon enough.


Lonzo shot .375 from 3 last year, which included his struggles in the bubble. His shot mechanics are clearly fixed, so I highly doubt he ever goes back to shooting poorly from out there. That said, his FT shooting is still not where you want it, but if he's taking most of his attempts from deep, it won't be that big of an issue.

I think his FT issues are very similar to his bubble issue, in that it's 95% mental. If you're going to invest in him long term, they should probably get him working with a sports psychologist to clear his mind.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 7:41 am to
Yeah, I think Griffin’s Beal trade hope is what keeps Lonzo on the roster. He probably figures at the very least a Lonzo S&T to a 3rd team can be a big chunk of the outgoing salary needed for Beal.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 7:46 am to
To me, even shooting well, there are just a lot of holes and non-complimentary aspects to his game relative to our two best players that I think if you have a good offer in place you should probably take it.

There’s also just rumblings that suggest to me he is still hellbent on chasing a glamour market and I worry about what that fosters over the course of another contract as he maneuvers himself(and likely recruits others) to chase bigger markets after his first big pay day.
Posted by sportsfan
Member since Feb 2011
3990 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 7:47 am to
My biggest issue is the fact that he will probably be asking for a big payday after the season, especially with Rich Paul running the show. I admit, he has been playing extremely well these last few weeks and he is the primary reason for our recent surge. But I don't know if I would pay top dollar for such a streaky player. Also, I still think Kira is the future PG of this offense. So if the value is good, I'd say trade Ball now.

I will also eat my crow here. I've been very critical of Lonzo and he has been playing great during this stretch.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 8:03 am to
Also, in regards to Lonzo’s shooting, one thing that needs to be kept in mind is the context in which it is occurring.

Only 10 of his 145 threes(and 21 of them last year), according to NBA tracking data, have come when a defender was in tight coverage(within 2-4 feet). Compare that to someone like Redick, that defenders respect as a shooter, who had to take 135 of his threes under “tight” coverage last season.

He’s hit four of those ten to his credit(33% last year), but that is a woefully inadequate sample size, and I think we have to wonder how sustainable is his shooting when defenders start deciding to go over screens, get hands in his face consistently, deny him easy looks, and not simply dare him to beat you from the arc? Which is inevitably going to happen if his shooting continues and will definitely happen in a future 7 game series.

And by now we should all be seeing how crucial that outlet shooter is for Ingram and Zion, and are you really trusting that Zo is that guy in a 7 game series? When a top ten defensive team puts a pesky defender on Zo and keeps tight coverage, when a Paul George or Kawhi Leonard is chasing him over screens, playing him tight in isolation, or closing out hard, that he is going to be the guy that will still be able to knock down outlet threes and reliably space the floor for Zion and Ingram?

I’m not convinced yet.

This post was edited on 2/10/21 at 8:09 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 8:18 am to
quote:

This roster is not set up for a floor general like that.
I'm certainly just guessing here out of the blue, but I'd imagine Lonzo would prefer a bigger role in running an offense as opposed to what he's doing now.

While we'll have the right to match any offer, I definitely wouldn't want to match and bring him back if he'll be unhappy, so if my wild guess is correct, that is something to keep in mind.
Posted by bonethug0180
Avondale
Member since Jul 2018
4896 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 8:34 am to
quote:

I think we have to wonder how sustainable is his shooting when defenders start deciding to go over screens, get hands in his face consistently, deny him easy looks, and not simply dare him to beat you from the arc?


That's EXACTLY what we want teams to do. If it gets to the point that teams are guarding him that tight at the 3 then that helps opens up the middle and makes the pick and roll game actually effective instead of a pointless dance.

That will also allow him to drive more off of picks as his guy gets too high and gives him space to get to the lane.

What you are suggesting is a bad thing is actually something we desperately need to happen
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 8:43 am to
quote:

That's EXACTLY what we want teams to do. If it gets to the point that teams are guarding him that tight at the 3 then that helps opens up the middle and makes the pick and roll game actually effective instead of a pointless dance.

That will also allow him to drive more off of picks as his guy gets too high and gives him space to get to the lane.

What you are suggesting is a bad thing is actually something we desperately need to happen



Completely agree. They are going to have to pick their poison. Right now, they are giving him space and he's making them pay for it. If they tighten up, Zion and BI will eat. Also, we're all talking about the offensive end. Zo is borderline elite on the defensive end. Losing that for a marginal upgrade shooting would be tough.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 2/10/21 at 8:56 am to
quote:

That's EXACTLY what we want teams to do. If it gets to the point that teams are guarding him that tight at the 3 then that helps opens up the middle and makes the pick and roll game actually effective instead of a pointless dance.


Well the first thing defenders are going to do more regularly is simply contest, close out, not hide bad defenders on him, and do like we do to teams and force him above the break(where he only shoots 31%). That’s not gonna do a ton different than what we see today.

We don’t even know if Lonzo is going to be able to sustain his shooting in the face of that small of an adjustment. And what little evidence we have(34% over two seasons when receiving tight coverage, 31% above the break) the early returns aren’t great.

He is also not a good pick and roll guard, not a good driving player, his floater is still non-existent, So that also becomes problematic. Since he’s simply not a three level scorer.

quote:

What you are suggesting is a bad thing is actually something we desperately need to happen


Of course if he could actually remain a threat in that capacity, but he actually has to prove it, and until he does I’m not willing to sign up for 15-20+ million to find out.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram