Started By
Message

LSU is a high risk, high reward for Freeman?

Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:50 am
Posted by TrueTigerTale
Zachary, La.
Member since Sep 2011
19318 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:50 am
On 104.5 this morning, they explained that the SEC West represents the greatest challenge for coaches. Coaches are quickly getting fired in the SEC who can’t cut it. Noted that both ND and LSU are both high risks and remaining at Cinncy is the only safe bet.

Also noted that Peetes was the QB coach at the Raiders when Carr made it to the pro bowl 3 years in a row, and the running back coach at Carolina when the back drafted from Stanford exploded in the NFL with his abilities to catch and run the ball. They’re hopeful Freeman will sign with LSU, all seemed to go well on his visit. He’s just gonna take his time to consult and decide before making such a big move.
This post was edited on 1/8/21 at 10:13 am
Posted by cajuntiger1010
Member since Jan 2015
9259 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:54 am to
Unless Luke Fickell brainwashes him to stay at Cincy, then I don't know why Freeman would not want to go to LSU with all the talent we have.
Posted by BearCrocs
Member since Aug 2013
6467 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:54 am to
I’d rather someone highly sought after than someone that literally no one wanted
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67593 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:55 am to
quote:

running back coach at Carolina when the back drafted from Stanford exploded in the NFL with his abilities to catch and run the ball.


McCaffrey was a can't miss in todays NFL
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
50952 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:57 am to
Sounds like they're just trying to make discussion to bide time until the announcement
Posted by TrueTigerTale
Zachary, La.
Member since Sep 2011
19318 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:57 am to
McCaffrey was a can't miss in todays NFL


Clyde wasn’t considered a great college back, but Coach Brady made it happen. Peetes can do the same.
This post was edited on 1/8/21 at 8:01 am
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
11438 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:57 am to
I believe that the risk level (low af) is the best reason for him to come here.
Posted by PenguinPubes
Frozen Tundra
Member since Jan 2018
10813 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:58 am to
You come here and do a great job... you get immediate national recognition for HC or nfl jobs. Aranda, joe brady etc

Does freeman believe he can turn our defense into a juggernaut again? If he doesn’t, don’t want him
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59762 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:58 am to
Clyde was pretty good in 2018 too. Oline was crap
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30483 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:59 am to
High Risk: Get fired after the covid/furlough season when 30% of your defense is gone

High Reward: LSU pays you 5.2 MM to leave after 30% of your defense is gone.



Sounds like a pelini article.I understand it hurts. But tell me where I’m wrong.
This post was edited on 1/8/21 at 8:06 am
Posted by Iam_PrinceAkeem
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2011
3118 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:02 am to
If he fails im sure Luke will pick him back up on whatever staff he's on at that time
Posted by TrueTigerTale
Zachary, La.
Member since Sep 2011
19318 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:03 am to
quote:

If he fails im sure Luke will pick him back up on whatever staff he's on at that time


That’s a safe bet.
This post was edited on 1/8/21 at 8:04 am
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28524 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:04 am to
Of course it is. The expecation level and outside attention is MUCH greater in the SECW than it is in the AAC. That's also why SECW schools are willing to pay 3-4X's as much as AAC schools.

Truth be told, this would probably be the BEST time for Freeman to come to LSU.

1. LSU looks to be returning several starters from last season;

2. There may be quite a bit of turnover for LSU's opponents. Alabama, A&M, Florida, Arkansas are all going to have new QB's. Auburn has the unknown of a new HC and the Mississippi schools, while improving (at least Ole Miss) probably aren't there yet

3. The measure of "success" is probably a bit lower than in previous years simply because of how bad the defense was last season. It shouldn't be that difficult to improve upon last year's dismal results.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63563 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:06 am to
Staying at a smaller school with meager talent has its risks too. A disappointing year or two and suddenly that luster is gone along with your big P5 payday.
Posted by CajunDan
Georgia
Member since Jan 2015
771 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:04 am to
High risk, high reward... that's where the big dicks hang. That's where winners live...
Posted by Tsw
Member since Dec 2020
75 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:05 am to
It would be hard for a coach to have a worse year on defense than we had last year. Seems pretty low risk, high reward to me.
Posted by Drizzt
Cimmeria
Member since Aug 2013
12948 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:05 am to
A small white running back from Stanford was considered a can’t miss NFL prospect? Okay...
Posted by Purple
Member since Jun 2009
76 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:14 am to
As bad as last year's defense was, it seems to me that the bar for the next DC is set pretty damned low.
Posted by Fightin Okra
Member since Nov 2016
5669 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:24 am to
Peetes? You mean Calvin and Rodney or Holly?
Posted by Johnnie10lb
Ville Platte
Member since Nov 2014
305 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:32 am to
"If you want to catch big fish, you need to fish in deep water" Mark Emmert (2000)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram