- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
“Abolish the Supreme Court”
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:12 pm
I’m seeing people post stuff all over social media calling for the abolition of the Supreme Court because:
“a system where 9 people determine how to interpret an entire constitution and establish policies for millions of people is not democracy”
You can’t make she shite up anymore
“a system where 9 people determine how to interpret an entire constitution and establish policies for millions of people is not democracy”
You can’t make she shite up anymore
21
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:13 pm to SwampAssassin
Peoples obsession with democracy and their ignorance of its history is remarkable
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:14 pm to SwampAssassin
quote:
“a system where 9 people determine how to interpret an entire constitution and establish policies for millions of people is not democracy”
Dems loved it when they used courts to legislate from the bench.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:14 pm to SwampAssassin
quote:
system where 9 people determine how to interpret an entire constitution a
this isn't wrong
I've been complaining about 'interpretation' for years.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:15 pm to SwampAssassin
Back in the day, the monumentally ignorant knew to keep their mouth shut. Now, they rule the culture. And there is nothing you can say that would disabuse them of the notion that ignorance is a virtue.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:15 pm to SwampAssassin
Not surprising. Its how they apply their ideology to all aspects of life.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:16 pm to SwampAssassin
So far Democrats have threatened to riot, destroy the legitimacy of the Supreme Court, destroy the Senate, and get rid of the Electoral College if they don't get their way.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:16 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
the monumentally ignorant knew to keep their mouth shut.
They just never had a platform to spew their ignorance. They’ve always been there.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:17 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Back in the day, the monumentally ignorant knew to keep their mouth shut. Now, they rule the culture. And there is nothing you can say that would disabuse them of the notion that ignorance is a virtue.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:17 pm to SwampAssassin
Every time the Left loses, it wants to cancel something.
Absolute children.
Absolute children.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:18 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
his isn't wrong I've been complaining about 'interpretation' for years.
I like to complain about my ignorance of the Constitution, too.
I was thinking of moving to another country. Maybe you should consider that.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:20 pm to SwampAssassin
Every developed nation on this planet has some form of a Supreme Court. What a bunch of maroons.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:20 pm to SwampAssassin
quote:
“a system where 9 people determine how to interpret an entire constitution and establish policies for millions of people is not democracy”
It wasn't ever intended to be democratic. It was intended to be the backstop. The Democrat fantasy of a living breathing Constitution, subject to the whims of an uninformed populace, that believe People Magazine is cutting edge journalism is comical.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:21 pm to John Gotti
Then call you a kook for saying they’re traitors 
Not sure what a traitor would look like if it doesn’t include calling for a complete abolition of the established government
Not sure what a traitor would look like if it doesn’t include calling for a complete abolition of the established government
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:28 pm to SwampAssassin
They have a good point
Roe v. Wade, Brown vs. Board, Gay Marriage was never voted on
Except for when it was in California and SCOTUS overturned it
Guess those decisions should be reversed
Roe v. Wade, Brown vs. Board, Gay Marriage was never voted on
Except for when it was in California and SCOTUS overturned it
Guess those decisions should be reversed
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:28 pm to SwampAssassin
I’d be fine with that. Any part of government being abolished is fine with me.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:29 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Peoples obsession with democracy and their ignorance of its history is remarkable
The same people who scream that Trump is a threat do our democracy are the ones who want to cancel every institution that they don't currently hold or look like they will lose.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:30 pm to SwampAssassin
These people still do not know the difference between a democracy and a republic. Our country is a republic and has never been a democracy. Big difference.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:31 pm to SwampAssassin
this and the abolish the electoral college trend really are making me lose hope for this country.
When those that I voted for lost, I didn't whine about abolishing it any of these things.
I do agree the supreme court does need an overall, mainly in the form of term limits, prolly 12 or 18 years. I do agree there is an issue with interpreting the constitution, as it shouldn't have to be interpreted and should just be applied without a political leaning one way or the other.
I do agree that the EC does need an overhaul. It should be by a county/parish level so that one city or area in a state doesnt decide where all of the EC votes go. Sorry but when a candidate wins 3084 of 3141 counties/parishes in this country, the election should not be close.
When those that I voted for lost, I didn't whine about abolishing it any of these things.
I do agree the supreme court does need an overall, mainly in the form of term limits, prolly 12 or 18 years. I do agree there is an issue with interpreting the constitution, as it shouldn't have to be interpreted and should just be applied without a political leaning one way or the other.
I do agree that the EC does need an overhaul. It should be by a county/parish level so that one city or area in a state doesnt decide where all of the EC votes go. Sorry but when a candidate wins 3084 of 3141 counties/parishes in this country, the election should not be close.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 1:32 pm to SwampAssassin
Interestingly enough, there is nothing in the constitution that's says the Supreme Court is the only branch that can interpret or has the ultimate last say in what is constitutional.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News