- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Father Must Pay $5K a Month So His Ex-Wife Can "Transition" His Son!
Posted on 8/14/20 at 5:13 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 8/14/20 at 5:13 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The excerpt that Tooner quotes above is from a crap site supportive of Dad. It is probably about as reliable as the crap site supportive of Mom, quoted a few hours ago.
In short, everyone is getting panty-bunched over something that is being misreported ... just like last Fall
You are the one crapping all over this thread you imbecilic troll. To paraphrase your avatar, I know that you know that I know that you are a troll.
For the record, nothing is being “misreported.” This mother has indicated repeatedly in court that she seeks to mutilate this poor child.
8-Year Old James Georgulas’ Father Has Court Victory Overturned, Mother Given Power to ‘Transition’ Child....
.
This post was edited on 8/14/20 at 7:13 pm
1
Posted on 8/14/20 at 5:16 pm to LSUGent
quote:
At what point as a father do you just liquidate all your assets and then kill her and the judge?
This is the correct answer. Time I’d be willing to serve for my son.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 6:24 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:Yes, she has.
This mother has indicated repeatedly in court that she seeks to mutilate this poor child.
I am sure you see this as being somehow relevant to something I posted or perhaps that I posted something contrary. It isn’t, and I didn’t. To the contrary, I specifically opined AGAINST “transition” of a pre-pubescent child.
Your post is actually cute, in a “Kid trying to speak at the adult table” sort of way. You know, when the kid needs to chime-in, despite not having understood anything that was just discussed.
quote:As a 30-year lawyer with more than 20 years experience with family law, I have provided some context that most laypersons just do not have.
You are the one crapping all over this thread you imbecilic troll.
By contrast, you have provided uninformed outrage about a ruling that was PROBABLY agreed by the parties and the details of which are probably being misreported.
To paraphrase a great American philosopher, “I am sorry I ruined your outraged, uninformed martyrdom party.“
This post was edited on 8/14/20 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 8/14/20 at 6:40 pm to Seldom Seen
dead women walkin'
Posted on 8/14/20 at 7:22 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Yes, she has.
I am sure you see this as being somehow relevant to something I posted or perhaps that I posted something contrary. It isn’t, and I didn’t. To the contrary, I specifically opined AGAINST “transition” of a pre-pubescent child.
It is wholly relevant to the conversation since this latest court ruling opens the door for the mother to follow through with her deranged plans. Anything else you discuss is windbaggery on your part.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 7:30 pm to Seldom Seen
What's the current rate for a hit on a judge? What a scumbag and degenerate.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 8:47 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:Again, you demonstrate that you have exactly ZERO idea what you are talking about.
It is wholly relevant to the conversation since this latest court ruling opens the door for the mother to follow through with her deranged plans. Anything else you discuss is windbaggery on your part.
We have not seen the Order, so we have no idea whether the JMC order has been replaced OR (as is FAR more likely) this is simply the judge resolving a comparatively-minor dispute about appointment of a counselor.
I have simply explained that the OP's representation of recent events (as reported by a noted Twitter troll) is almost certainly erroneous.
But please DO continue ranting and raving about something that almost certainly did NOT happen.
This post was edited on 8/14/20 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 8/14/20 at 8:51 pm to Seldom Seen
I’d spend the rest of my life in prison for killing that bitch if it was my son. I’ll put up with a lot but frick with my boy and she’s toast.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 9:23 pm to Bulldogblitz
quote:
CPS is failing this child
Par for the course.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 9:24 pm to AggieHank86
Question...
bottom line... at this present time, is this woman actually being allowed to mutilate her child or not?
Yes or no?
I've read this entire thread.... and still can't really tell.
bottom line... at this present time, is this woman actually being allowed to mutilate her child or not?
Yes or no?
I've read this entire thread.... and still can't really tell.
This post was edited on 8/14/20 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 8/14/20 at 9:59 pm to Seldom Seen
Unless I missed something, according to the story, the $5,000 is the cost of counseling services:
quote:That said, $5,000 a month is outrageous for counseling, so I’m a bit skeptical of that amount.
The “Save James” Facebook page, run by individuals who support Mr. Younger’s cause, claims counseling will cost Mr. Younger $5,000 a month
Posted on 8/14/20 at 10:58 pm to Seldom Seen
I'd put all my equity into the childs name in a treist and kill that bitch before she ever saw a penny.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 4:54 am to SSpaniel
quote:we do not know with 100% certainty, because the gag order from last Fall is still in place.
bottom line... at this present time, is this woman actually being allowed to mutilate her child or not?
More than twenty years of experience and a few extrapolations based upon that experience tell me “no.” The judge likely did nothing more than order counseling for the two boys and name a family counselor.
Because that was done without hearing, it was almost certainly an agreed temporary order until a hearing next month.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 4:59 am to buckeye_vol
quote:This appears to be correct
Unless I missed something, according to the story, the $5,000 is the cost of counseling services:
quote:What is “twice the amount that qualifies as outrageous?”
$5,000 a month is outrageous for counseling, so I’m a bit skeptical of that amount.
Judges order counseling in tough divorces all the time, and I have NEVER seen a $10k retainer for counseling. I have seldom seen any retainer at all.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 7:07 am to AggieHank86
Thanks!
Also... you either get up really early for a Saturday or stay up REALLY late.
Also... you either get up really early for a Saturday or stay up REALLY late.
This post was edited on 8/15/20 at 7:09 am
Posted on 8/15/20 at 7:31 am to SSpaniel
quote:I have always been an early riser. I grew up on a ranch.
you either get up really early for a Saturday or stay up REALLY late.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 7:48 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
That said, $5,000 a month is outrageous for counseling, so I’m a bit skeptical of that amount.
Without insurance you would have to be going every day including saturdays and Sunday’s .
With insurance 3x a day.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 7:52 am to Seldom Seen
I would snatch that kid and book to a non-extradition country.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 7:58 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:this is an amount far in excess of what I believe to be reasonable, but…
Without insurance you would have to be going every day including saturdays and Sunday’s .
With insurance 3x a day.
$250 per hour is at the high end, but not crazy as an hourly rate.
If the counselor wants to spend the first month doing individual sessions, in addition to a single group session, each week… You are talking five sessions per week and four weeks. That is 20 sessions. 20 sessions at $250 an hour is $5000.
Again, that is more counseling than I think is really necessary. Plus, dad should only be responsible for half of that.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 8:18 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:if the left had its way they make it legal to club a 13 yo over the head.
It is insane to me that transition surgery is legal for children under 18.
It absolutely should be banned.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News