- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump tax return decisions coming shortly SCOTUS 7-2, 7-2
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:09 am
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:09 am
30
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:12 am to wickowick
John Roberts for a democrat win?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:13 am to wickowick
quote:
Article II and the Supremacy Clause do not categorically preclude, or require a heightened standard for, the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting President.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:14 am to wickowick
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:14 am to wickowick
These career politician mf’s should show where all their fricking money has come from. Whole topic is so insane
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:14 am to wickowick
I really don’t see any legal basis for forcing a citizen to share their financial information.
But I also foolishly thought the SCOTUS was there to protect our rights from the politicians. So what do I know
But I also foolishly thought the SCOTUS was there to protect our rights from the politicians. So what do I know
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:14 am to wickowick
Roberts writes the opinion in the ultimate frick YOU to Trump.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:14 am to wickowick
This isn't the one involving congress.. that one will be 5-4 for the good guys!
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:15 am to GregMaddux
Which is the flip side of this.
How long until Biden’s financial documents are subpoenaed to look for transfers from his crackhead son to him?
How long until Biden’s financial documents are subpoenaed to look for transfers from his crackhead son to him?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:15 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
Article II and the Supremacy Clause do not categorically preclude, or require a heightened standard for, the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting President.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:16 am to wickowick
They gotta release them. SCOTUS ruled. 
:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:
:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:16 am to wickowick
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:16 am to PhoenixLSUTiger
And they will be released after the election giant win
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:16 am to PhoenixLSUTiger
quote:
End of majority says issue here was limited to absolute immunity and heightened need, and 2d Circuit ordered case returned to District Court for other possible issues. So SCOTUS remands and presumably the case still goes back to 2d Circuit and then District Court.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:16 am to wickowick
FOX just can't wait for SCOTUS to skewer Trump. Fat Boy Stirewalt is about to piss himself.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:16 am to TigerDoc
What a fricking sham
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:16 am to wickowick
It is legally the right decision. All the reasons have been explained here for months.
But there will be great gnashing of teeth and rending of clothing on TDPT.
But there will be great gnashing of teeth and rending of clothing on TDPT.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:16 am to teke184
quote:
Which is the flip side of this.
How long until Biden’s financial documents are subpoenaed to look for transfers from his crackhead son to him?
Could be the trap that’s being laid here.
Page 1 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News