Started By
Message

re: Why does our economy have to tank in this setting?

Posted on 3/29/20 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by AwfulBambino
Member since Mar 2020
22 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 1:31 pm to
When this is all over I think we're going more regulations or a blanket ban of wet markets from the US & EU
Posted by CheEngineer
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2019
4234 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

You mean like we do with electric power plants?

Yes, we pay old plants that aren't economical to run most of the year to remain operational for the several days of the year they are needed.

That means you have to pay operators to keep them maintained and the fuel supply ready all year long, even thought they might only run for 120 hours a year.


Can you provide examples I get we probably have some that are old and inefficient but I am doubtful we maintain entire facilities for 120 hrs a year. Heck I probably have that many hours out of power outages each year and it is not like you just flip the switch and these things start up at full capacity. Not saying you a wrong just not aware of any out there.
This post was edited on 3/29/20 at 1:38 pm
Posted by MichiganTiger
Where Global Warming is Welcomed!
Member since Dec 2004
7795 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

Problem is...a lot of Congress is bought of by the Chinese


Problem is...our corporations like the profit margins with cheap Chinese labor,,,and us consumers like buying cheap Chinese goods!
Posted by MichiganTiger
Where Global Warming is Welcomed!
Member since Dec 2004
7795 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

So no one pays anyone?



Yup. A Mexican standoff...until we reopen for business!
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15927 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 1:12 am to
Thought crossed my mind today that I hope this type of thing isn't the new War on Terror. We can't be shutting countries down every couple of years. This had better be a once-in-a-lifetime type of event.

Also, I think you're going to see some politicians and figureheads try to use this as the tipping point in the push for socialized medicine in the U.S.

quote:

Can we learn from this and be proactive? Because, the reality is that something like this will happen again...it's not a matter of if...but when. So, can we enact legislation to protect the economy (our businesses and people) and activate it when a new nasty bug takes off from God knows where. Businesses and regular folks will need protections from creditors for the duration of the social isolation and pause...banks will need to hold cash reserves to protect themselves with federal insurance to protect them after a given time span...and furloughed employees will need temporary employment income (not as much as normal as the legislation needs to allow for pauses w/o penalties for mortgage and major utility bills). With this kind of proactive legislation, we can allow the president to pull the rip cord before the pandemic precautions go into effect and keep the economy from tanking and the market from overreacting. Just an idea to kick around. Sounds better than patchwork bailouts that costs trillions!

This post was edited on 3/30/20 at 1:13 am
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 1:17 am to
quote:

This economy is a house of cards, the initial bailout weakened it and now companies like Boeing can run on a shoestring because they know congress will bail them out.


Of course you'll be downvoted here by the bootlickers, but you're 100% correct.
Posted by 88Wildcat
Topeka, Ks
Member since Jul 2017
14054 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 3:32 am to
quote:

It would be very expensive to maintain hospital space you don’t need just “in case” some dude eats a bat halfway across the world.


How much have we spent on the TSA for the last two decades? How likely would it have been that another 9/11 would have occurred without them? At what time in the last twenty years has "this would be very expensive" ever been an effective argument in Congress?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162295 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 3:40 am to
quote:


How much have we spent on the TSA for the last two decades? How likely would it have been that another 9/11 would have occurred without them? At what time in the last twenty years has "this would be very expensive" ever been an effective argument in Congress?


Valid point

And at least we get some value out of an expanded hospital system
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14922 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 3:44 am to
quote:

So no one pays anyone?


Yes. Everything has to be paused for a while and all essential expenses paid for everyone.
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14922 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 3:46 am to
quote:

Problem is...our corporations like the profit margins with cheap Chinese labor,,,and us consumers like buying cheap Chinese goods!


We’re just going to have to give up all of that. It’ll be worth it.
Posted by MichiganTiger
Where Global Warming is Welcomed!
Member since Dec 2004
7795 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 10:01 am to
quote:

We’re just going to have to give up all of that. It’ll be worth it.


I'm not disagreeing with you...but $ is a powerful motivator. I think it'd be great to get those jobs and infrastructure back home!
Posted by MichiganTiger
Where Global Warming is Welcomed!
Member since Dec 2004
7795 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 10:06 am to
quote:

blanket ban of wet markets


This should be the main point of emphasis with China. There's been a lot of China bashing on this board...but it's clear they're not going to change their pseudo-Commie ways and human rights violations. However...they HAVE to get rid of these wet markets. SARS1 was contained so there wasn't an uproar to close the markets. NOW...the whole world is paying for these stupid markets, so we (as the rest of the world) should put all efforts on shutting them down.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37311 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 10:47 am to
We don't do "pro-active" in this country...

What you are proposing makes some sense. A few years ago, Congress passed a package of "basic tax relief" that automatically takes affect when the president declares a major disaster.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22846 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Yes. Everything has to be paused for a while and all essential expenses paid for everyone.


How does this work? Your bill you don’t pay is a paycheck your creditor can’t issue, is a bill his employees can’t pay, etc
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16733 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Can we learn from this and be proactive?


Probably not. Just look around at those demanding people hole up in their homes, business shutting down (even essential ones), etc. In the long arc, when the data is in and better scientists have had time to look at it along with the measures taken, it will probably show that the whole "flattening the curve" mantra has been wholly ineffective, the number and rate of infection changed very little compared to what it would have otherwise been. But that won't change the minds of politicians and doctors with side-salad MPH degrees who are ginning up their self-importance for all they are worth right now. None of this will come out until well after this has passed and normal life resumed, the MSM will astutely ignore anything that contradicts the current narrative and the unthinking masses won't care so nothing will really change. Warehouses stocked full of hastily produced ventilators will go to rot in the years before the next pandemic sends the world into bed-shitting paroxysm.
Posted by Gtmodawg
PNW
Member since Dec 2019
4580 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 11:41 am to
The answer isn't increasing beds in case the answer is increasing the capacity to identify and react in a timely manner to threats to the Nation. In this case that would mean increased spending on research and monitoring of emerging health issues globally and locally. We have been incredibly fortunate if this is as bad as it gets....if this thing was somehow airborne and had a death rate like Ebola or AIDS we wouldn't be concerned about small business failings we would be concerned with industrialized nations ceasing to exist. This would mean of course an international effort which would mean some serious diplomatic effort to provide the kind of transparency required but that is what is needed.

We also need to be able to react to emerging crisis when they do blind side us....increased capacity for mobile hospitals like those going up now...timely information about contact and spread and reacting where needed etx. These are things that will take a monumental effort and will be something that has to be done nationally and not by the state...and are things we will spend a lot of time on when this thing is controlled. We have the ability and resources we now have evidence of the necessity.....it is what we do going forward that matters not what we did because we can't change that now.
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 11:47 am to
quote:

I think all major countries will seek to massively expand hospital capacity after this.

If the capacity is big enough, you don’t have to flatten the curve


Are you a current subscriber to MSNBC & CNN fan clubs?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram