- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Jim Carrey / Margot Robbie incident on Graham Norton
Posted on 2/17/20 at 5:42 pm to TheeRealCarolina
Posted on 2/17/20 at 5:42 pm to TheeRealCarolina
quote:
Tim Allen
What about Tim Allen is looney besides him being a republican?
1
Posted on 2/17/20 at 5:50 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Carrey really nailed that sociopathic a-hole Dr. Robotnik in Sonic because he was just being himself.
Seriously couldn’t have been more perfect for that role
Posted on 2/17/20 at 5:52 pm to The Pirate King
He's a nut job based on that comment?
Or he was ribbing a beautiful girl because he knows most men are hard-legging her like crazy and him not treating her like Helen of Troy would throw her off her guard and elicit a laugh? Don't overthink things.
Or he was ribbing a beautiful girl because he knows most men are hard-legging her like crazy and him not treating her like Helen of Troy would throw her off her guard and elicit a laugh? Don't overthink things.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 5:52 pm to SoFla Tideroller
I think you are confused
Posted on 2/17/20 at 6:39 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Margot's body language was definitely chilly & closed-off: minimal eye contact, crossed legs, arms crossed (not folded) and would lean away when Jim would engage her.
Jim was obviously flirting. His body language was open: legs & arms uncrossed, torso/legs faces Margot not Graham, chest open, responds to Graham's questions by giving his replies towards Margot (& guests on couch).
Jim eventually & unsurprisingly engages Margot directly and makes the indirect "compliment" acknowledging that she's fricking gorgeous. Twitter takes it as a demeaning sexist put-down.
Jim was obviously flirting. His body language was open: legs & arms uncrossed, torso/legs faces Margot not Graham, chest open, responds to Graham's questions by giving his replies towards Margot (& guests on couch).
Jim eventually & unsurprisingly engages Margot directly and makes the indirect "compliment" acknowledging that she's fricking gorgeous. Twitter takes it as a demeaning sexist put-down.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 7:08 pm to LSUFreek
quote:
Twitter takes it as a demeaning sexist put-down.
I don’t think it’s sexist but it is most certainly a demeaning put down
She’s coming off a recent Oscar nomination, which is more than Carrey has had in his career (which is crazy btw) but it’s not like she’s Megan Fox
Posted on 2/17/20 at 8:12 pm to LSUFreek
quote:
Twitter takes it as a demeaning sexist put-down.
I mean, it was a put down
Posted on 2/17/20 at 8:35 pm to LSUFreek
quote:well, it is
Twitter takes it as a demeaning sexist put-down.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 9:39 pm to LSUFreek
That's kind of the style of the Graham Norton show. All the guests typically engage in the conversation even when one is the 'focus' of the current interview by Graham.
This post was edited on 2/17/20 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 2/17/20 at 10:04 pm to Unknown_Poster
I love his crazy arse. Hope I have that energy when I get to the backside of 50.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 10:18 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
well, it is
Leave your fruitiness on the msb.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 10:37 pm to Fewer Kilometers
I'd rather frick her than him.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 12:35 am to Fewer Kilometers
WTF that was well within the bounds of innocence chat. frick this snowflake bullshite.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:09 am to taylork37
quote:
Did it really flop though? 79% critic and audience scores on rotten tomatoes?
Birds of Prey took in $33.2 million over its opening weekend in the United States. That’s the worst opening weekend for a DC Extended Universe movie yet, lower than Shazam’s $53.5 million and much below Suicide Squad’s $133.6 million.
Likes on the internet don't pay the bills.
This post was edited on 2/18/20 at 3:10 am
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:54 am to Fewer Kilometers
Isn’t the tone of that show usually for guests to kinda interact with each other and rib each other a bit?
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:03 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Or he was ribbing a beautiful girl because he knows most men are hard-legging her like crazy and him not treating her like Helen of Troy would throw her off her guard and elicit a laugh? Don't overthink things.
And the justification continues.
Seriously, this alone doesn't constitute proof that Carrey is loonie, but it also doesn't make it any less cringey what occurred.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:05 am to Havoc
quote:
within the bounds of innocence chat
...
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:07 am to Unknown_Poster
quote:
And that doesn't include marketing which probably doubles that cost.
If they truly spent that much on marketing, they need to fire that firm. That was one of the worst marketing campaigns I've seen for a big budget film.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 9:16 am to skrayper
I'm surprised by this thread, because I assumed most people thought Jim Carrey was a complete loser who was basically irrelevant at this point. I didn't know that people thought he was crazy and I'm shocked to see people talking about him as a brilliant, crazy artist.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 9:39 am to Pettifogger
quote:
I'm surprised by this thread, because I assumed most people thought Jim Carrey was a complete loser who was basically irrelevant at this point.
Why would you assume that?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News