Started By
Message
locked post

Who sets foreign policy?

Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:37 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119044 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:37 pm
The president or career bureaucrats?
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
34091 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:37 pm to
The president
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43400 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:38 pm to
Democrats.

Now shut up and listen to your betters peasant.

Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119044 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:38 pm to
But Mr. Goldman and Nadler think the career bureaucrats set foreign policy.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45402 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:38 pm to
A lieutenant colonel.

Duh
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9912 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:40 pm to
Article I gets no love.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96515 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:40 pm to
Who runs Bartertown? MasterTrump.
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35563 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:42 pm to
I don't know why the republicans aren't hammering this point home. They keep trying to differentiate between what Biden did and what Trump did by saying Biden did it in accordance with US foreign policy and Trump did it not in accordance with US foreign policy...but if the President sets US foreign policy, then it is by definition in accordance with US foreign policy. Right?
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30288 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:43 pm to
Technically, the voters of the winning Presidential candidate approve the foreign policy platform, and the President implements that mandate.
This post was edited on 12/9/19 at 3:43 pm
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16801 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

But Mr. Goldman and Nadler think the career bureaucrats set foreign policy.


I can’t believe no one is calling this out.

They should say, “if in the middle of a meeting, the president decided to completely ditch existing policy and make up a new policy and direction on the spot - would it be within his power to do so?”
Posted by samiam5211
Member since Jul 2017
41 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:50 pm to
The President.

So why didn’t he run his Ukraine scheme through normal channels.

The bureaucrats have to follow his orders unless his motives are corrupt. In which case you need Rudy and Lev to run the show.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9912 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

but if the President sets US foreign policy, then it is by definition in accordance with US foreign policy. Right?


Not really exactly how it works.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119044 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

I don't know why the republicans aren't hammering this point home. They keep trying to differentiate between what Biden did and what Trump did by saying Biden did it in accordance with US foreign policy and Trump did it not in accordance with US foreign policy...but if the President sets US foreign policy, then it is by definition in accordance with US foreign policy. Right?




Well, exactly.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9912 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:57 pm to
Dat Gumbo man ain't nebber heard of tha Impoundment Act.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30288 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:01 pm to
I can assure you Trump knew of it though. How would one square that with any argument that Trump was prepared to indefinitely withhold the aid while also being unprepared to present an argument as to why.
This post was edited on 12/9/19 at 4:02 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

But Mr. Goldman and Nadler think the career bureaucrats set foreign policy.


They don't think it they know it. The Founding Fathers told them so.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119044 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Dat Gumbo man ain't nebber heard of tha Impoundment Act.




But that is not what Mr. Goldman and Nadler are arguing.

The Ukraine got their aid. IN TIME. According to Congress.

The Impoiundment Act does not apply.

They are just mad because Trump bought Javelins from Raytheon. Trump spent the money before the bureaucrats in the US embassy in Ukraine could spend it on their NGO buddies. That's why they are mad.

Why do you support this kind of corruption?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140874 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

scheme


DU received the DNC talking points.

The party of menstruating men members repeat said points. It’s hilarious.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Dat Gumbo man ain't nebber heard of tha Impoundment Act.



Joke??
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119044 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

So why didn’t he run his Ukraine scheme through normal channels.


Because normal channels are corrupt.

Normal corrupt channel:

Tax Payer>Ukraine Foreign Aid>US Embassy in Ukraine>Payments to the Atlantic Council and other NGOs>Payments to DC politicians

Proper channel:

Tax Payer>Ukraine Foreign Aid>Raytheon for Ukrainian Javelins

DC is pissed Trump went through the proper channel. It was supposed to be their money.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram