Started By
Message

LDWF/ Trout

Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:51 pm
Posted by bearhc
Member since Sep 2009
5669 posts
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:51 pm
I notice that we have not seen additional threads about the desperate situation our speckled trout population is in. The Biloxi Marsh is loaded with trout right now, and from what I hear many places are as well. It was all about the diversion and the high river boys. The trout are here. Next time the river is high, open Morganza.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
33757 posts
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:54 pm to
it's coming....
Posted by KemoSabe65
70605
Member since Mar 2018
6345 posts
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:59 pm to
I am having the best Oct-Nov in years on Big Lake. Granted, the bird bite is hit or miss and bigger fish are on the reefs. Will be out there this afternoon with a buddy slaying them again.
LINK
Posted by Drunken Crawfish
Member since Apr 2017
3883 posts
Posted on 11/6/19 at 1:26 pm to
It’s been a good one for sure.





Posted by DTRooster
Belle River, La
Member since Dec 2013
8873 posts
Posted on 11/6/19 at 1:34 pm to
Anybody who hasn’t been able to catch trout can’t fish. We do not have a population problem.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
24510 posts
Posted on 11/6/19 at 2:05 pm to
You're likely right.

It was obvious to many that the freezes of '17 had more to do with the trout population, but they will use this to ruin what is left of my passion for the sport.

Driving 3 hours each way for another hour to and from on the water for 5-15 fish that may or may not reach the required length is going to be my tipping point.

As it is I only get to make 6-10 trips a year, and have to deal with water in the camp monthly now, so put those monies toward the golf club. They'll probably be doing me a huge favor.

The part that really bothers me is that anything the govt touches goes to shite, and they have their regulations on Big Lake and its results staring them in the face, along with the obvious this fall everywhere else (great numbers), but all that be damned.

And on the subject of Big Lake and its reduced limit, has that been beneficial to the population or size of the trout since its implementation?

Who could answer yes to that with a serious face?
Posted by Drunken Crawfish
Member since Apr 2017
3883 posts
Posted on 11/6/19 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

And on the subject of Big Lake and its reduced limit, has that been beneficial to the population or size of the trout since its implementation?


The entire time I have fished the lake it has been a 15 trout bag limit so I can't speak to how it was before. I do know that, on average, I have caught larger fish at Big Lake than anywhere else but that has been true well into the 80s and 90s for the estuary.

Posted by Saskwatch
Member since Feb 2016
17985 posts
Posted on 11/6/19 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

wahoocs


You bring up the same bs every time a thread pops up about the discussion of speckled trout limits. Just go ahead and switch to golf full time. You will probably be happier and your golf game much better.
Posted by Wolfmanjack
Member since Jun 2017
1204 posts
Posted on 11/6/19 at 6:05 pm to
Governor honor code put the trout talk on the back burner till after the election. If Edwards wins its coming. I have no idea what happens if Rispone wins? Busted up the trout Sunday in all that wind. No shortage of trout south of Houma.
Posted by Reelscreamers
Member since Aug 2011
120 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:55 am to
It's obvious that JBE's WLF is pushing this but this past Saturday Rispone was on the More Outdoors Show on 3WL out of New Orleans. The question was ...... Mr. Rispone what do you see as the most pressing issue facing the WLF department? Mr. Rispone opened with he could not believe that we were still at 25 on speckled trout, that we have not gone to 10 or 15 like the others around us.
.
Now later in the show he talked several times about he's been drinking from a firehose and would rely on experts that he placed in various positions but his initial response worries me as much as JBE's group.
Posted by commode
North Shore
Member since Dec 2012
1282 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 9:02 am to
I'm not getting into the population debate, but my concern is how much the spawn was affected by the longer season of high river water. Those trout eggs don't float real well on brackish water.I figured the fish would still spawn, but how much of a success rate as to years in the past.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86410 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 9:07 am to
quote:

I do know that, on average, I have caught larger fish at Big Lake than anywhere else
Same
Posted by Uncle JackD
Member since Nov 2007
59436 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Mr. Rispone opened with he could not believe that we were still at 25 on speckled trout, that we have not gone to 10 or 15 like the others around us.
I didn’t think a trout limit was such a high priority for our state Gubment

Going to 15 would be fine with me, IF studies show it’ll help our fisheries... I’m a pretty terrible fisherman so catching 15 is a solid day for me.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
24510 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 9:10 am to
Just let me whine and bitch about something I have a passion for become a thing of the past, strictly based on logical reasoning.

Obviously it's not something I want to see happen, but I'm nothing if not practical, and fishing offshore easily became a thing of the past when they got involved there.

I really don't want to see trout fishing turn into one chartered trip a year for me.
Posted by nolaks
Member since Dec 2013
1291 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 9:16 am to
I think having a blanket limit throughout the year and almost across the state (calc being exception) doesn't really fit. The fish are very vulnerable at certain times and spots.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
24510 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 9:18 am to
I'll let the guys that fish there regularly weigh in more on it, but there is no argument that the number of bigger fish caught in Big Lake is less than it was previous to the reduced limit.

There is no way any type of analytical study could show that the reduced limit has resulted in bigger fish in Big Lake.

But just a quick survey of those that fish the area regularly would tell you that. No study necessary.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
33757 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 9:32 am to
so ya'll don't trust what the biologists think?


Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86410 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 9:44 am to
quote:

but there is no argument that the number of bigger fish caught in Big Lake is less than it was previous to the reduced limit.
Wait, what?
Posted by Drunken Crawfish
Member since Apr 2017
3883 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 9:53 am to
2006 La Sportsman Thread

I find it funny that we are here 13 years later having the same conversation
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
24510 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 10:01 am to
I won't even begin to argue why guides are fine with a 15 fish limit

Everyone knows a guide on Big Lake. Ask him off the record if he catches more big trout since the reduction.

I'm not replying on that subject back and forth all day.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram