- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:39 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:39 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Nonetheless, it is safe to assume that each side presented extensive medical and psychological evidence. The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong.
Even 5 years ago, I would have assumed, too. But you know what they say when you assume?
I assume the 1 juror would be required to take courses in transgenderism as well 5 years from now, but o don't see how you can predict accurately anymore in this clown world of ours.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:41 am to Robin Masters
quote:
the erosion of the nuclear family and an increased focus on the happiness of the parent, which in my view, should remain secondary to the rearing of the offspring.... At least until they are out of the house.
/\ THIS /\ is the way mankind raised itself out of the tide pools and became a successful specie.
Our culture now obsessed more with nihilism and are about to become swamp creatures again.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:02 am to AtticusOSullivan
I’d shoot her dead without a second thought.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:06 am to RebelExpress38
I’m curious as to how anything involving custody/domestic issues goes before a jury.
All these matters should be determined by a judge or hearing officer.
All these matters should be determined by a judge or hearing officer.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:07 am to arseinclarse
quote:Texas Constitution.
I’m curious as to how anything involving custody/domestic issues goes before a jury.
All these matters should be determined by a judge or hearing officer.
Texans love juries.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:07 am to LegendaryOutlaw
If I were on the jury they'd never convict you, Snakes should be shot.
This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 8:09 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:10 am to AggieHank86
So if I live in Austin and decide to divorce my bat shite crazy wife, I’d have to go before my “peers” to see what happens with my kids and property?
They’d take one look at my manliness and be repulsed. I’d lose everything?
They’d take one look at my manliness and be repulsed. I’d lose everything?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:10 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Nonetheless, it is safe to infer that each side presented extensive medical and psychological evidence. The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong
There is no such thing as a valid reason for a 7 year old to get transition therapy
Period
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:12 am to antibarner
Dallas cop who accidentally shoots neighbor after mistakenly entering the wrong apartment and thinking the neighbor was a burglar? String her up!
Dallas man who shoots and kills ex-wife with malice aforethought, because he disagrees with her medical decisions for their child? Let him go!
Welcome to the Poli board.
Dallas man who shoots and kills ex-wife with malice aforethought, because he disagrees with her medical decisions for their child? Let him go!
Welcome to the Poli board.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:16 am to arseinclarse
quote:No.
So if I live in Austin and decide to divorce my bat shite crazy wife, I’d have to go before my “peers” to see what happens with my kids and property?
They’d take one look at my manliness and be repulsed. I’d lose everything?
Texas gives certain decisions to a jury (if requested) and others to the judge. Summary
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:17 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Nonetheless, it is safe to infer that each side presented extensive medical and psychological evidence. The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong.
Doubtful, this is a highly politicized topic. The vote took place in Dallas. If the case were here in Ascension Parish you'd see the vote flipped.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:19 am to AggieHank86
quote:
because he disagrees with her medical decisions for their child?
Interesting way to phrase chemical castration...
On 9/11 some people did something too.
This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 8:20 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:20 am to Azkiger
quote:
The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong.
ROFLMAO
On what planet is this REMOTELY true
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:23 am to RebelExpress38
This isn’t the Onion??
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:24 am to ShortyRob
quote:No doubt your experience with Texas juries far exceeds my own.quote:ROFLMAO
The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong.
On what planet is this REMOTELY true
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:28 am to AggieHank86
quote:
he disagrees with her medical decisions for their child
You’re the one calling blatant child abuse a “medical decision”. Just because a 11 people and a quack judge in loony liberal land says otherwise does not make it so.
You are the most ridiculously smarmy and dishonest cuck I know.
Buckley would’ve been railing against this story with a passion you consider beneath you.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:30 am to ShortyRob
quote:
There is no such thing as a valid reason for a 7 year old to get transition therapy
Pedophiles are celebrating. If 7 year olds can make decisions like these what else can they decide for themselves?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:35 am to Sentrius
quote:I suspect that he (like me) would opine that the child is too young for any physical transition AND that he (like me) would disapprove of the father, if he were to kill the ex-wife in vigilante fashion.
Buckley would’ve been railing against this story with a passion you consider beneath you.
I also suspect that he would keep his emotions in check. In a long career, I recall exactly ONE emotional outburst from Buckley, when Gore Vidal called him a Nazi.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:41 am to Azkiger
Pedos and Progs are the happiest people alive today seeing this story.
That poor child. This type of shite really pisses me off.
That poor child. This type of shite really pisses me off.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News