- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New MSY airport to open on Nov 6th
Posted on 10/18/19 at 8:47 pm to Chicken
Posted on 10/18/19 at 8:47 pm to Chicken
It is a more compact design. The old terminal was added onto piecemeal, so it was kind of sprawled out. Concourse A was out of service, but still a visible part of the terminal footprint.
2
Posted on 10/18/19 at 9:05 pm to White Roach
Fly out on the 5th and back on the 8th.... Should be interesting
Posted on 10/18/19 at 9:08 pm to Paul Allen
quote:
Hard to believe that you didn’t fly BTR considering you’re Mr. Baton Rouge.
Pretty sure one of the requirements to being Mr Baton Rouge is you have to be from Louisiana
Posted on 10/18/19 at 9:18 pm to cgrand
Me too
Posted on 10/18/19 at 9:20 pm to White Roach
quote:
It is a more compact design
Posted on 10/18/19 at 9:21 pm to Shoulderchoke
quote:uber to airport?
Fly out on the 5th and back on the 8th.... Should be interesting
Posted on 10/18/19 at 9:21 pm to ELVIS U
This airport is another in a series of cluster fricks by Mitch!!
Totally unneeded and unnecessary
Totally unneeded and unnecessary
Posted on 10/18/19 at 9:26 pm to MrLSU
I thought they were having different entrances for arrivals and departures as well as a route that joins the two.
From that pic it looks like all the traffic comes in and leaves through the same single point (with a traffic circle thrown in because... why not
).
From that pic it looks like all the traffic comes in and leaves through the same single point (with a traffic circle thrown in because... why not
).
Posted on 10/18/19 at 9:27 pm to cgrand
You poor bastard. My next isn’t until the 12th
Posted on 10/18/19 at 9:36 pm to Bard
quote:
t (with a traffic circle thrown in because... why not ).
Yeah, it’s sort of hard to figure out the point of that shite.
Posted on 10/18/19 at 10:46 pm to Y.A. Tittle
“Past monitoring of 100 of the state’s 300-plus traffic circles revealed these particular intersections, which used to be traffic-signal controlled, experienced a 38 percent drop in car deaths and injuries. At the same time the total number of crashes jumped 12 percent. These additional accidents caused mainly property damage, and are thought to be a result of confused or unprepared drivers trying to navigate the unfamiliar roadway design.“
We now have an answer it was put in to reduce deaths. LOL. Buddy Bart is fixing to eat at the airport.
We now have an answer it was put in to reduce deaths. LOL. Buddy Bart is fixing to eat at the airport.
Posted on 10/18/19 at 11:34 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
How many years do you think it will take for them to learn to run the boondoggle?
The following situation certainly doesn't inspire confidence.
quote:
The $1.3 billion project, initially scheduled to be completed by May 2018, has missed four opening dates. The most recent delay came in the spring, when plans to open the terminal had to be pushed back again when it was discovered that drainage pipes had cracked and needed to be fixed.
While crews were dealing with that issue, they also realized that an AT&T utility vault would have to be buried to prevent it from blocking the path of an access road leading to the new facility.
They just noticed that issue recently? Shouldn't that have been noticed during that "planning" stage?
This post was edited on 10/18/19 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 10/18/19 at 11:38 pm to Saintsisit
Whoa creepy mfer
Posted on 10/19/19 at 12:33 am to BoxmanTiger
Maybe, but they look smokin hot
Posted on 10/19/19 at 12:48 am to MrLSU
I am still not sure what was wrong with current airport and required a $1B replacement
Posted on 10/19/19 at 1:16 am to danilo
quote:
I am still not sure what was wrong with current airport and required a $1B replacement
Ole Baw Mitch Landrieu needed to get a cut of the 1 billion for future political aspirations or to line his pockets.
Or when it is all said and done, and he assumes room temperature, the city decides to rename something or the entire airport with his name.
This post was edited on 10/19/19 at 1:21 am
Posted on 10/19/19 at 2:20 am to MrLSU
That's surprising. I thought they were going to hold off until after the runoff on November 16 so voters don't get pissed at John Bel Edwards when the inevitable traffic clusterfrick happens.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 5:49 am to MrLSU
Will the toilet flush?
Posted on 10/19/19 at 5:50 am to Bard
Airport has nice curves except for the ugly rectangle parking garage dumped on top of it. Would it have been that hard to give the garage some matching curves?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News