- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:23 pm to TheCaterpillar
what ever happend with this?
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:43 pm to Tigear
Him and his homies might be lying in chalk.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 8:26 am to Tiger fan999
The kid hired the husband of an ADA who is also running for judge and they recently had a hearing moved due to Covid. Trial scheduled for January 2021
Posted on 10/6/20 at 8:55 am to boosiebadazz
Total hijack, but what happened to the guy that beat the homeless man to death in NOLA? It's like that story disappeared. Surely SOMETHING has happened since then. You can only get so many continuances.
I can't remember his name, I guess I'll google. THe Catholic High guy that was a commercial realtor. Ward, maybe?
I can't remember his name, I guess I'll google. THe Catholic High guy that was a commercial realtor. Ward, maybe?
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:34 am to Tiger fan999
quote:
what ever happend with this?
Who knows, besides the Diocese and the parties? The Diocese is pretty good at confidential settlements, if that is what happened. In all likelihood we will never know.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:38 am to TBoy
It’d be quite the stretch to find any liability on the part of the diocese here.
This post was edited on 10/6/20 at 9:42 am
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:39 am to TBoy
quote:
Who knows, besides the Diocese and the parties?
Apparently, boosiebadazz
Posted on 10/6/20 at 10:45 am to boosiebadazz
quote:who?
The kid hired the husband of an ADA who is also running for judge
Posted on 10/6/20 at 10:48 am to blueboy
Moose Billeaud is the husband of Michele Billeaud
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:00 am to boosiebadazz
Ah. I was already voting for Shelly Maturin before I read that. Now I have another reason.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:05 am to blueboy
Yeah, I’ve had cases with Shelly and I think he’d make a great judge. I’m voting for him too.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:08 am to boosiebadazz
Didn’t said poisoning occur after bad kid was allowed back into stm? If so, the diocese is 100% liable, you’re Better than this esquire.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:11 am to KemoSabe65
do the duty/risk analysis on a 17 year old student entering a janitor’s closet, intentionally grabbing lye, and intentionally poisoning another student with it
Like I said, you can make an argument for the diocese being liable, but it’s pretty specious.
Like I said, you can make an argument for the diocese being liable, but it’s pretty specious.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:23 am to boosiebadazz
BRB...I've got to google specious.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:24 am to REB BEER
quote:
We will first address the issue presented in the School Board's application, i.e., whether the lower courts erred in finding independent liability on its part for failure to supervise the students during this physical education class.2 The trial *346 court found that the School Board was 100% liable for Wallmuth's injuries using the duty-risk analysis of La. C.C. art. 2315,3 finding that “the conduct of the School Board in failing to supervise the students was a cause-in-fact of Joshua Wallmuth's injuries.” On the other hand, the court of appeal found that the School Board was 70% liable for Wallmuth's injuries under La. C.C. art. 2320, which provides, in part, as follows:
Teachers and artisans are answerable for the damage caused by their scholars or apprentices, while under their superintendence.
In the above cases, responsibility only attaches, when the ... teachers or artisans, might have prevented the act which caused the damage, and have not done it.
**8 The court of appeal set out what we believe is the correct standard of liability regarding the liability of a school board for the actions of its students under La. C.C. art. 2320:
A school board, through its agents and teachers, owes a duty of reasonable supervision over students. La. Civ.Code art. 2320; Adams v. Caddo Parish School Bd., 25,370 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/19/94), 631 So.2d 70, writ denied, 94,684 (La.4/29/94), 637 So.2d 466. The supervision required is reasonable, competent supervision appropriate to the age of the children and the attendant circumstances. Jackson v. Colvin, 98–182 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/23/98), 732 So.2d 530, writ denied, 99–228 (La.3/19/99), 740 So.2d 117. This duty does not make the school board the insurer of the safety of the children. Id. Constant supervision of all students is not possible nor required for educators to discharge their duty to provide adequate supervision. Adams, 631 So.2d 70.
Before liability can be imposed upon a school board for failure to adequately supervise the safety of students, there must be proof of negligence in providing supervision and also proof of a causal connection between the lack of supervision and the accident. Id. “Injury from horseplay between discerning students which, at some stage may pose an unreasonable risk of harm to the participants, does not automatically and of itself render the supervising authority liable.” Henix v. George, 465 So.2d 906, 910 (La.App. 2 Cir.1985). Furthermore, before a school board can be found to have breached the duty to adequately supervise the safety of students, the risk of unreasonable injury must be foreseeable, constructively or actually known, and preventable if a requisite degree of supervision had been exercised. Id.
Wallmuth v. Rapides Par. Sch. Bd., 2001-1779 (La. 4/3/02, 7–8); 813 So.2d 341, 345–46
quote:
KemoSabe65
Kemo suck these balls, bitch
This post was edited on 10/6/20 at 11:26 am
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:32 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Kemo suck these balls, bitch
frick you, I laughed
Posted on 10/6/20 at 6:55 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
The kid hired the husband of an ADA who is also running for judge and they recently had a hearing moved due to Covid. Trial scheduled for January 2021
So Moose has the criminal case. Who is representing the injured kid in the civil claim?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News