- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: *Mueller Corrects* We did not reach a determination as to whether POTUS committed a crime
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:43 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:43 am to cajunangelle
Must be nice to be able to correct your testimony.
Someone should ask him if Flynn or PapaD or Stone could correct theirs?
Someone should ask him if Flynn or PapaD or Stone could correct theirs?
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:44 am to cajunangelle
quote:
we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime
that determination would be for a judge or jury anyway
the only determination for a prosecutor is whether or not to allege a crime was committed
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:46 am to cajunangelle
Also, I would like to point out that,
“not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime” = he determined the President did not commit a crime.
“not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime” = he determined the President did not commit a crime.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:49 am to bmy
Bmy, i understand that you may be blinded by TDS, but see reality.
No prosecutor in the world (outside of mueller) completes an investigation, does not bring charges, but then argues that the individual is not “exonerated”.
So i do not care what the opinion said, nor the context in which you took mueller statements. It is all BS.
You would be pissed if you were the one being investigated by the feds, and you were being dealt with like this. Every American should be scared sh!tless of this scenario.
No prosecutor in the world (outside of mueller) completes an investigation, does not bring charges, but then argues that the individual is not “exonerated”.
So i do not care what the opinion said, nor the context in which you took mueller statements. It is all BS.
You would be pissed if you were the one being investigated by the feds, and you were being dealt with like this. Every American should be scared sh!tless of this scenario.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:49 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Someone should ask him if Flynn or PapaD or Stone could correct theirs?
They absolutely could have. They chose not to.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:51 am to Screaming Viking
quote:
Bmy, i understand that you may be blinded by TDS, but see reality.
No prosecutor in the world (outside of mueller) completes an investigation, does not bring charges, but then argues that the individual is not “exonerat
How many prosecutors have formally investigated whether or not a sitting president committed a crime?
It's quite simple.. in matters related to the presidents conduct Mueller and his team were not acting as prosecutors. They were fact finders.
This post was edited on 7/28/19 at 9:53 am
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:52 am to bmy
quote:
They absolutely could have. They chose not to.
You do not know that.
You are reduced to pulling shite out of your arse.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:53 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
he determined the President did not commit a crime.
He was never going to make a determination as clearly laid out in the report. His clarifying statement now matches the report.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:54 am to bmy
quote:Please. What a load of crap.
3) 'Because of the opinion our investigation into the presidents conduct was limited to a fact finding investigation and we made no attempt to determine whether the president committed a crime'
This is the reality and what Mueller says in the report.
The Special Council was a far-left lynch mob hell-bent to hang Trump. They looked everywhere, and found NOTHING chargeable.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:54 am to gthog61
quote:
You do not know that.
You are reduced to pulling shite out of your arse.
Anyone can correct their testimony
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:55 am to bmy
quote:Nope. If this were the case, no one would ever investigate a sitting president.
2) 'They did not make a determination as to whether the president committed a crime because of the opinion'
Sentence is factully accurate and is much less misleading.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:55 am to bmy
quote:
How many prosecutors have ever been charged with investigating whether or not a sitting president committed a crime?
But isn't the goal to apply the law equally amongst those in positions of high power, same as the rest of us? That noble goal went real well.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:56 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
The Special Council was a far-left lynch mob hell-bent to hang Trump. They looked everywhere, and found NOTHING chargeable
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:59 am to bmy
quote:
It's quite simple.. in matters related to the presidents conduct Mueller and his team were not acting as prosecutors. They were fact finders.
We agree. Great. They found no convicting facts. And when you do not have convicting facts, by definition, you are innocent. And here we are agreeing. Isn’t this great!!
Posted on 7/28/19 at 10:01 am to bmy
That’s not reality because in Muellers interview with Barr and Rosenstein he said the OLC played no part in his findings.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 10:01 am to davyjones
quote:
But isn't the goal to apply the law equally amongst those in positions of high power, same as the rest of us? That noble goal went real well.
We agree. There is just one exception.
In 1973, in the midst of the Watergate scandal engulfing President Richard Nixon, the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel adopted in an internal memo the position that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Nixon resigned in 1974, with the House of Representatives moving toward impeaching him.
"The spectacle of an indicted president still trying to serve as Chief Executive boggles the imagination," the memo stated.
The department reaffirmed the policy in a 2000 memo, saying court decisions in the intervening years had not changed its conclusion that a sitting president is "constitutionally immune" from indictment and criminal prosecution. It concluded that criminal charges against a president would "violate the constitutional separation of powers" delineating the authority of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. government.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 10:02 am to cajunangelle
I haven’t really been paying attention. Was that line why all these idiots have been screaming about putting Trump in jail when he’s not President anymore?
Posted on 7/28/19 at 10:30 am to The Boat
No, a democrat asked Mueller if Trump could be indicted after he is finished being President. Mueller of course replied Yes and the media went into full we got heeeem mode.
(You can indict anyone at anytime, being that SDNY closed the cases against Trump this is desperate)
How can the progressive democrats really think Trump belongs in jail? When anyone with a lick of common sense knows Obama and his administration belong in jail? If Trump used govt agencies including the FBI & DOJ to do oppo research and espionage on the Kamala Harris campaign, and if God forbid she won-Leak classified Presidential convos with world leaders and set up a Flynn, he would be under the jail.
If Trump gave Iran/Russia/China/ISIS- jets, uranium, money, gold, favors, Trump would be executed at dawn on CNN LIVE for aiding and abetting the enemy. Black jesus is above the law.
(You can indict anyone at anytime, being that SDNY closed the cases against Trump this is desperate)
How can the progressive democrats really think Trump belongs in jail? When anyone with a lick of common sense knows Obama and his administration belong in jail? If Trump used govt agencies including the FBI & DOJ to do oppo research and espionage on the Kamala Harris campaign, and if God forbid she won-Leak classified Presidential convos with world leaders and set up a Flynn, he would be under the jail.
If Trump gave Iran/Russia/China/ISIS- jets, uranium, money, gold, favors, Trump would be executed at dawn on CNN LIVE for aiding and abetting the enemy. Black jesus is above the law.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 10:35 am to TigerBait1971
quote:
Mueller is a mess.
He's flip flopped on this thing 10 times already.
Dude is legit senile.
He's not a mess. He went into this with an agenda and failed and now he has been caught and he is scared shitless over what is about to happen to him.
The old saying goes, if you come after the king you better not miss, this mother fricker missed and the shots are about to be coming back his way and he has no more ammo. He's fricked.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)