- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Move back to your dying hometown. Unless you can’t.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:18 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:18 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Move back to Metairie? Hard pass
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:19 pm to PrimetimeDaBoss
quote:
cis
What does this mean?
Opposite of trans
Chemically speaking
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:23 pm to ksayetiger
Normal. It means she isn’t mentally ill and denying reality
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:27 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
Michele Anderson, who is a white cis woman,
Oh good, glad they cleared that up right away.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:34 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
white cis woman
Stopped reading here. frick that weirdo.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:35 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
How about we just live and work where we want and not worry about shite like this?
Towns are like businesses....if they are dying and shutting down, there is probably a good reason why
Towns are like businesses....if they are dying and shutting down, there is probably a good reason why
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:37 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
So they meant normal white woman with the white cis woman part I assume. frick their pro nouns and anyone that uses them out of fear of offending someone.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:38 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
If there were social and economic opportunities in my hometown for myself and my family, I would live there. But neither exist, so I will never move back there.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:42 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Originally from New Iberia, LA. It's going to continue to die a slow death regardless if I or anyone moves back there.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:43 pm to LSUFanHouston
Immigration and birthright citizenship of course
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:44 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
I don’t think my moving back to BR would make it any better.
I’m sure plenty of posters here would argue it would make BR worse.
I’m sure plenty of posters here would argue it would make BR worse.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:44 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Some people just wanna be the big fish in the small pond, I guess.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:48 pm to TigersSEC2010
quote:
Bawcomville
It's Bawcomehomeville now
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:48 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
“Small town.... population 14,000....”
Does not compute.
Does not compute.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:48 pm to lsuwontonwrap
quote:
Americans have always had a contentious relationship with permanence. Mobility, both social and geographic, is in the American DNA. As Alexis de Tocqueville famously observed, “In the United States, a man builds a house in which to spend his old age, and he sells it before the roof is on;…he settles in a place, which he soon afterwards leaves to carry his changeable longings elsewhere.” While this sort of mobility has now spread across the globe, it was a novel trait to the 19th century Frenchman, and stood in stark contrast to the Old World Europe that Tocqueville knew. Indeed, his very surname belies the rootedness to place that defined European aristocracy: he was Alexis of Tocqueville, a particular place with a particular history.
There are, of course, profound political implications of American mobility. The meritocratic nature of American democracy encourages the most talented to pursue career opportunities without regard to place. This has helped create Charles Murray’s “superzips” and contributed to the “brain drain” that has so devastated Middle America and the inner cities. The meritocratic sorting of American society is much to blame for our severe political polarization, whereby educated, predominately liberal elites congregate in urban areas on the coast, leaving the large swaths of flyover country from whence they came.
But even beyond political homogenization and polarization, mobility weakens civil society by lessening our obligations to our neighbors. Tocqueville, contrasting Old World aristocracy to American democracy, observed, “Aristocratic families maintain the same station for centuries, and often live in the same place. So…[a man] freely does his duty by both ancestors and descendants and often sacrifices personal pleasures for the sake of beings who are no longer alive or are not yet born.” Permanence, that sense of rootedness to place, provides a constant reminder of our familial and neighborly obligations, absent which the incentive to invest in civil society is greatly diminished. It’s no surprise, then, that more and more Americans are “bowling alone”. Why invest in the difficult work of forming associations when one could move across the country—or world—at any time?
Fortunately, the perils of mobility have not gone unrecognized. Those who care about place, permanence, and civil society have taken up the argument for remaining in one’s hometown. Justin Hannegan, writing in The Imaginative Conservative, presents a compelling case for hometown living, urging Americans to consider that “perhaps permanence—the guardian of family, tradition, practical wisdom, environment, and culture—is worth it.”
Bill Kauffman, in his address at TAC’s September event on revitalizing Main Street in Jackson, Michigan (and subsequently published in this space), made a similar appeal to the value of permanence:
And if we are disloyal to our place, to the place our ancestors made, then why should our children show any loyalty to us? If the city in which they grow up is stripped clean of its landmarks—and I don’t mean just the homes of great men, of presidents and thieves—I mean the corner groceries and baseball fields and the front-porched homes that make a neighborhood—well, why should young people choose to stay in such a self-disrespecting place? Why not just move to a manicured suburb with high average SAT scores—say, Columbine, Colorado, where all your dreams can come true?
This post was edited on 4/16/19 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 4/16/19 at 12:58 pm to Centinel
quote:
My hometown isn't dying. Just the opposite. Unfortunately this makes it entirely too attractive to the hipster locust swarm.
NAL isn't cool enough yet to attract many hipsters. They all live in Birmingham.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 1:10 pm to blueridgeTiger
quote:
I guess I should move back to Bogalusa
You get a pass, no one willingly stays in Bogalusa
Posted on 4/16/19 at 1:15 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
My hometown has a weak economy, below par schools, and few cultural opportunities. But there's nary a hipster within 100 miles.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 1:21 pm to PrimetimeDaBoss
quote:
cis
What does this mean?
It means the person using it has a useless liberal arts degree.
Posted on 4/16/19 at 1:26 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 2:03 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)