- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Dawkins pleas, Alleva is in God's little acre....
Posted on 3/31/19 at 11:28 am to Lester Earl
Posted on 3/31/19 at 11:28 am to Lester Earl
Jesus Christ dude.
If there's a plea deal, there is then a 0% chance that Wade testifies under oath regarding his relationship with Dawkins and his general recruiting practices. There was always a good chance he wasn't going to get on the stand and that the "tapes" weren't going to be admitted, but if he pleas out then that's a done deal. If the tapes aren't public record and he doesn't have to testify, nothing more comes out of it besides what we have now which is brief snippets leaked to the media of him maybe talking about paying a player that can be explained away if you aren't an idiot. Make them prove you committed some kind of wrongdoing.
If there's a plea deal, there is then a 0% chance that Wade testifies under oath regarding his relationship with Dawkins and his general recruiting practices. There was always a good chance he wasn't going to get on the stand and that the "tapes" weren't going to be admitted, but if he pleas out then that's a done deal. If the tapes aren't public record and he doesn't have to testify, nothing more comes out of it besides what we have now which is brief snippets leaked to the media of him maybe talking about paying a player that can be explained away if you aren't an idiot. Make them prove you committed some kind of wrongdoing.
0
Posted on 3/31/19 at 11:30 am to Anaximander
You seem to have some working knowledge of legal proceedings. Can I ask your profession?
Oh and the way you bitch slapped Lester Earl was especially satisfying.
Oh and the way you bitch slapped Lester Earl was especially satisfying.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 11:31 am to Lester Earl
quote:
The only link Wade has to the case the is relative to his dealings with LSU is his "inability" to talk. He will still have to explain himself. Dawkins taking a plea means zero
I know dropping out in 8th grade when you started selling your body to old men has taken its toll on your brain but you need to really try and think.
If Wade does not have to testify under oath, do you really think it has nothing to do with the rest of the issue? Are you really that infinitely stupid?
And, again, what did Joe Alleva have for dinner last night?
This post was edited on 3/31/19 at 11:33 am
Posted on 3/31/19 at 11:33 am to Anaximander
quote:
and be the weakest AD in the NCAA after being shown up by his BB coach.
Too late
Posted on 3/31/19 at 11:39 am to madddoggydawg
Joe, we already know your hopes and dreams.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 11:46 am to Anaximander
You heard the tape and investigated the tape and there were no impermissible benefits.
They have cleared the player so there was no offense.
If there was no offense then how do you suspend a coach for no offense no matter what is on the tape.
They have cleared the player so there was no offense.
If there was no offense then how do you suspend a coach for no offense no matter what is on the tape.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 11:47 am to Philippines4LSU
quote:
Why he is being allowed to burn down the athletic department during the remainder of his lame duck tenure speaks to the ineptitude of FKA and the disdain for LSU held by JBE and JW.
All of this
Posted on 3/31/19 at 11:59 am to madddoggydawg
quote:
madddoggydawg
quote:
Lester Earl
It’s been pretty entertaining watching these two go from probably just genuinely playing devil’s advocate in the beginning to going all out on being contrarian and argumentive pricks.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:07 pm to BayouBengal99
Two men go to rob a bank, one goes in with a gun while the other waits in the car with the engine running. The man in the bank pulls out his gun and says, "Get on the floor, this is a hold up!" He is quickly overwhelmed. What does the man in the car do? He drives off like nothing happened.
Now you want to say that the man with the gun never actually stole anything, and you want to parse his words in such a way as to deny that there was ever any intent to rob the bank in the first place. You further claim that everyone else is stealing money, why can't he?
Meanwhile the getaway driver gets to claim plausible deniability, and you want to blame him for the whole thing going wrong because he didn't go into the bank with guns blazing to help his partner out.
Good luck with all that.
Now you want to say that the man with the gun never actually stole anything, and you want to parse his words in such a way as to deny that there was ever any intent to rob the bank in the first place. You further claim that everyone else is stealing money, why can't he?
Meanwhile the getaway driver gets to claim plausible deniability, and you want to blame him for the whole thing going wrong because he didn't go into the bank with guns blazing to help his partner out.
Good luck with all that.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:09 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Two men go to rob a bank, one goes in with a gun while the other waits in the car with the engine running. The man in the bank pulls out his gun and says, "Get on the floor, this is a hold up!" He is quickly overwhelmed. What does the man in the car do? He drives off like nothing happened.
Now you want to say that the man with the gun never actually stole anything, and you want to parse his words in such a way as to deny that there was ever any intent to rob the bank in the first place. You further claim that everyone else is stealing money, why can't he?
Meanwhile the getaway driver gets to claim plausible deniability, and you want to blame him for the whole thing going wrong because he didn't go into the bank with guns blazing to help his partner out.
Good luck with all that.
Horrible example. This would be more like the man who went in with gun talking to someone who had no connection with the robbery and with no details being recorded and only having a written transcript of part of that recording.
This post was edited on 3/31/19 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:14 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
The only link Wade has to the case the is relative to his dealings with LSU is his "inability" to talk. He will still have to explain himself.
Explain what exactly?
Why he refused to meet with LSU officials? He was subpoenaed to provide sworn testimony in a criminal proceeding. Only a fool would talk about such testimony with anyone prior. Even the tools at LSU would understand Wade's predicament.
quote:
Dawkins taking a plea means zero
It has very substantial meaning.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:15 pm to Jay Quest
quote:
Why he refused to meet with LSU officials? He was subpoenaed to provide sworn testimony in a criminal proceeding. Only a fool would talk about such testimony with anyone prior. Even the tools at LSU would understand Wade's predicament.
And, again, contact language is often ignored in court when there is mitigating circumstance. It is not written in stone and always enforceable.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:22 pm to Anaximander
quote:
And, again, contact language is often ignored in court when there is mitigating circumstance. It is not written in stone and always enforceable.
And interpretation is often more favorable for employee than employer.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:23 pm to Anaximander
Your take makes no sense. Do you really believe Alleva wants to damage the program he oversees? Do you think he wants to get rid of his best hire? How does any of this make sense to you?
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:28 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Your take makes no sense. Do you really believe Alleva wants to damage the program he oversees? Do you think he wants to get rid of his best hire? How does any of this make sense to you?
I think he is arrogant and impulsive despite how much it hurts the program. That was PROVEN at Duke.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:53 pm to Philippines4LSU
quote:
It just eats away at you knowing that it's only a confession in your delusional imagination
You posted this yesterday: quote:And you want to talk delusional.
The "people" saying that are paid trolls hired by Alleva to promote a false narrative to try to convince the fanbase that we should be okay with Joe firing Wade.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:58 pm to arcalades
quote:
What if the FBI hands over everything to the NCAA?
They aren’t handing over evidence of what is most likely an ongoing investigation to the bunch of half retarded people at the ncaa
quote:
What if the FBI hands over nothing and judicial watch files FOIA?
I’m not even sure if that evidence is subject to FOIA. Unlikely and most likely doesn’t fit into the timeframe for this to be resolved between LSU and WW.
quote:
What if bama offers Wade a deal he can't refuse?
I didn’t read any further than ur post so I assume someone here has informed you it won’t happen because they hired a coach a few days ago
quote:
what if UCLA offers Wade a deal he can't refuse?
Dude, UCLA isn’t hiring WW. I don’t believe Wade will be unable to find a coaching job if LSU fires him but let’s be reasonable. One of the most legendary basketball programs of all time isn’t hiring him fresh off all of this much less making him an offer he can’t refuse. Teams would be coming after him if this whole fiasco hadn’t happened. Someone will hire him. It won’t be UCLA. Havent they already targeted someone anyway?
This post was edited on 3/31/19 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 3/31/19 at 1:39 pm to madddoggydawg
quote:
quote:
The "people" saying that are paid trolls hired by Alleva to promote a false narrative to try to convince the fanbase that we should be okay with Joe firing Wade.
And you want to talk delusional.
I would agree on the paid part. But there are a lot of felching sycophants that just want to take a position to put Alleva in a positive light. That they are doing it on their own is even more bizarre.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 1:45 pm to Lester Earl
“ he will still have to explain himself”
If LSU, by itself, had something Coach Wade couldn’t possibly explain away, he would already be fired.
He isn’t and therefore, they don’t.
If LSU, by itself, had something Coach Wade couldn’t possibly explain away, he would already be fired.
He isn’t and therefore, they don’t.
Posted on 3/31/19 at 2:07 pm to madddoggydawg
quote:
madddoggydawg
How pathetically poor do you have to be to take a job that pays x cents per post?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News