- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

No Review on Battle Interception and Last UCF touchdown.
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:21 pm
Did not see any confirming video on either play.
This post was edited on 1/2/19 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:29 pm to Spelt it rong
The INT looked legit from the views I saw. Wish we had a challenge/TO left....
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:30 pm to Spelt it rong
quote:
Both were correct
What video evidence shows Battle's kneed did not hit in bounds first? Also, it appeared that the UCF player pushed Battle to help him go out of bounds.
Anyone have video showing the play close up? They did not show multiple angles of the play. Looked close enough to review.
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:31 pm to CamdenTiger
Yep his buttocks lands in the field of play, making it an INT. Period.
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:35 pm to 2E
Just watched the game for the first time. Battles left foot hit down in bounds prior to the hip landing out.
Insane that it wasn’t reviewed at such a critical point.
Insane that it wasn’t reviewed at such a critical point.
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:36 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
it appeared that the UCF player pushed Battle to help him go out of bounds.
This means nothing according to the rules.
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:42 pm to 2E
Should have reviewed Battle's interception and Burrow's TD run.
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:43 pm to djmicrobe
both plays were incorrectly called and a review overturns both of them
the rules were changed, if you get pushed out then you are out
that said it was clear his foot touched in bounds before he landed out of bounds. IT WAS A COMPLETED CATCH
the refs were clearly trying to help UCF, they did everything they could but thankfully it wasnt close enough for the refs to decide the game.
UCF got away with at least 9 blatant clear interference and/or holding receivers arms down with no calls yet if LSU even marginally put hands on a UCF player it was a penalty. plus there were 7 targeting plays in that game by my count. and whats most infuriating is they called a review on the burrow one and had the balls to say a player who set and launched himself leading with his head hit burrow in the neck and head yet they decided that wasnt targeting
im not going to say there is some organized cheating by the bowl system or the conferences, but its clear there is widespread cheating by the refs so its undeniable someone is getting paid off to make or not make those calls.
quote:
What video evidence shows Battle's kneed did not hit in bounds first? Also, it appeared that the UCF player pushed Battle to help him go out of bounds.
Anyone have video showing the play close up? They did not show multiple angles of the play. Looked close enough to review.
the rules were changed, if you get pushed out then you are out
that said it was clear his foot touched in bounds before he landed out of bounds. IT WAS A COMPLETED CATCH
the refs were clearly trying to help UCF, they did everything they could but thankfully it wasnt close enough for the refs to decide the game.
UCF got away with at least 9 blatant clear interference and/or holding receivers arms down with no calls yet if LSU even marginally put hands on a UCF player it was a penalty. plus there were 7 targeting plays in that game by my count. and whats most infuriating is they called a review on the burrow one and had the balls to say a player who set and launched himself leading with his head hit burrow in the neck and head yet they decided that wasnt targeting
im not going to say there is some organized cheating by the bowl system or the conferences, but its clear there is widespread cheating by the refs so its undeniable someone is getting paid off to make or not make those calls.
This post was edited on 1/2/19 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:48 pm to djmicrobe
quote:i don’t think this matters
Also, it appeared that the UCF player pushed Battle to help him go out of bounds.
Posted on 1/2/19 at 10:34 pm to Tigers4life
quote:
Burrow's TD run.
Most infuriating non review of the game. That was a TD. And we didn’t even challenge. Settled for 3 instead.
Posted on 1/2/19 at 10:34 pm to keakar
Are you guys' fools???? There was no agenda with these refs. There were 25 penalties...let that sink in 25. That is not counting the penalties they missed on both sides, that's right, it was on both sides. They were a horrible ACC crew and definitely not use to being on the big stage. This was a bad officiating crew period, they missed alot of calls on both sides. The game was a sloppy one too, especially from our patchwork DBs, it happens.
This post was edited on 1/2/19 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 1/2/19 at 10:36 pm to 2E
LSU is winning despite the man trying to keep us down!
This post was edited on 1/2/19 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 1/2/19 at 10:42 pm to tjtiger9
don't know that I would call it cheating, but blatant favoritism by this ACC crew for the AAC school over the SEC school; no question in my mind that this crew favored UCF with both calls and non-calls, as well as failure to review obvious plays that should have been reviewed... but the Tigers overcame all this adversity and won!!!!
Posted on 1/3/19 at 1:45 am to 2E
I thought the worst call was not giving Burrow a rushing TD on the opening drive. It was a clear TD and no review?
Posted on 1/3/19 at 2:15 am to ramchallenge
College referees in all sports are just incompetent. There is no agenda against any one tram they just aren’t very good.
Popular
Back to top
6









