Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

No Review on Battle Interception and Last UCF touchdown.

Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:21 pm
Posted by 2E
Member since Jan 2019
11 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:21 pm
Did not see any confirming video on either play.
This post was edited on 1/2/19 at 9:23 pm
Posted by Spelt it rong
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
10792 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:23 pm to
Both were correct
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65317 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:29 pm to
The INT looked legit from the views I saw. Wish we had a challenge/TO left....
Posted by djmicrobe
Planet Earth
Member since Jan 2007
4970 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

Both were correct


What video evidence shows Battle's kneed did not hit in bounds first? Also, it appeared that the UCF player pushed Battle to help him go out of bounds.

Anyone have video showing the play close up? They did not show multiple angles of the play. Looked close enough to review.
Posted by BayouBengal99
Crowley
Member since Oct 2007
9311 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:31 pm to
Yep his buttocks lands in the field of play, making it an INT. Period.
Posted by Capo
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2013
1061 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:35 pm to
Just watched the game for the first time. Battles left foot hit down in bounds prior to the hip landing out.

Insane that it wasn’t reviewed at such a critical point.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61512 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

it appeared that the UCF player pushed Battle to help him go out of bounds.



This means nothing according to the rules.
Posted by Tigers4life
The great US of A
Member since May 2004
1975 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:42 pm to
Should have reviewed Battle's interception and Burrow's TD run.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:43 pm to
both plays were incorrectly called and a review overturns both of them

quote:

What video evidence shows Battle's kneed did not hit in bounds first? Also, it appeared that the UCF player pushed Battle to help him go out of bounds.

Anyone have video showing the play close up? They did not show multiple angles of the play. Looked close enough to review.


the rules were changed, if you get pushed out then you are out

that said it was clear his foot touched in bounds before he landed out of bounds. IT WAS A COMPLETED CATCH

the refs were clearly trying to help UCF, they did everything they could but thankfully it wasnt close enough for the refs to decide the game.

UCF got away with at least 9 blatant clear interference and/or holding receivers arms down with no calls yet if LSU even marginally put hands on a UCF player it was a penalty. plus there were 7 targeting plays in that game by my count. and whats most infuriating is they called a review on the burrow one and had the balls to say a player who set and launched himself leading with his head hit burrow in the neck and head yet they decided that wasnt targeting

im not going to say there is some organized cheating by the bowl system or the conferences, but its clear there is widespread cheating by the refs so its undeniable someone is getting paid off to make or not make those calls.
This post was edited on 1/2/19 at 9:50 pm
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60949 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

Also, it appeared that the UCF player pushed Battle to help him go out of bounds.
i don’t think this matters
Posted by PillageUrVillage
Mordor
Member since Mar 2011
15805 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Burrow's TD run.


Most infuriating non review of the game. That was a TD. And we didn’t even challenge. Settled for 3 instead.
Posted by tjtiger9
MS
Member since Aug 2005
4009 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 10:34 pm to
Are you guys' fools???? There was no agenda with these refs. There were 25 penalties...let that sink in 25. That is not counting the penalties they missed on both sides, that's right, it was on both sides. They were a horrible ACC crew and definitely not use to being on the big stage. This was a bad officiating crew period, they missed alot of calls on both sides. The game was a sloppy one too, especially from our patchwork DBs, it happens.
This post was edited on 1/2/19 at 10:37 pm
Posted by TexasTiger80
Texas
Member since Apr 2018
2396 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 10:36 pm to
LSU is winning despite the man trying to keep us down!
This post was edited on 1/2/19 at 10:37 pm
Posted by ramchallenge
Member since Nov 2009
3582 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 10:42 pm to
don't know that I would call it cheating, but blatant favoritism by this ACC crew for the AAC school over the SEC school; no question in my mind that this crew favored UCF with both calls and non-calls, as well as failure to review obvious plays that should have been reviewed... but the Tigers overcame all this adversity and won!!!!
Posted by JR
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2005
1374 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 1:45 am to
I thought the worst call was not giving Burrow a rushing TD on the opening drive. It was a clear TD and no review?
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13735 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 2:15 am to
College referees in all sports are just incompetent. There is no agenda against any one tram they just aren’t very good.
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
48911 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 2:35 am to
Review crew was trash all year
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram