- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:24 pm to High C
I’m excited
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:25 pm to c on z
quote:
Considering college football’s history of dynasties, there nothing really unusual here.
If this was like those old dynasties Alabama would not have won in 2011 or last year. Why? LSU and Georgia would have been playing someone else in the sugar while Alabama would have been somewhere else praying for upsets.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:28 pm to High C
This board always jerks off over the Pats and says people love dynasties but when a couple of them are around in CFB every one bitches and moans. Oh wait. LSU board... bitching and moaning... ahh now I get it. 
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:29 pm to TotesMcGotes
No one blames them. Nothing wrong with pointing out that they know it's trash and people aren't going to watch.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:30 pm to Dr RC
quote:
This board always jerks off over the Pats and says people love dynasties but when a couple of them are around in CFB every one bitches and moans.
The Patriots don't rely on a committee sitting behind closed doors to put them in the Super Bowl.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:31 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
The big question to me is how have these two programs outpaced all other CFB programs?
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:33 pm to SoDakHawk
Part recruiting, part circumstance.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:33 pm to Dr RC
quote:
This board always jerks off over the Pats and says people love dynasties but when a couple of them are around in CFB every one bitches and moans.
I hate the Patriots. Nice generalization, though.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:34 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Always helps having a backup plan!
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:34 pm to Dr RC
quote:
This board always jerks off over the Pats
Pars never made a Super Bowl after failing to make the AFC championship
No mulligans for them
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:37 pm to c on z
quote:
Considering college football’s history of dynasties, there nothing really unusual here.
Bryant, Paterno, Scembecler, Broyles, Royal, Hayes, Osborne, Wilkerson. None of those guys made the rest of CFB irrelevant. There was always somebody who could give them a challenge and had a realistic chance of beating them. What Saban has done is unprecedented, at least in the modern era. Maybe you could go back to somebody like Walter Camp or Amos Alonzo Stagg for a comparison, IDK.
Moreover, Saban knows exactly what he's doing to the game, and he doesn't give a shite.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:38 pm to hendersonshands
Would be part III not part IV checkmate
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:39 pm to truthbetold
They need to cap the number of players on teams to 70 to spread the talent to other colleges.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:41 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Bryant, Paterno, Scembecler, Broyles, Royal, Hayes, Osborne, Wilkerson. None of those guys made the rest of CFB irrelevant. There was always somebody who could give them a challenge and had a realistic chance of beating them. What Saban has done is unprecedented, at least in the modern era. Maybe you could go back to somebody like Walter Camp or Amos Alonzo Stagg for a comparison, IDK.
None of them would have won a national title without winning their conference title either. Saban has two titles after being given a second chance they would not have had.
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:44 pm to ProfFrink
quote:
Saban has two titles after being given a second chance they would not have had.
Muh eye test
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:50 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
How dare they try and convince people that their product is worth watching!
We’re not talking about commercials, which would be fine, but if a columnist like Schlabaugh is writing a column or worse was instructed to write a column in an attempt to promote the game, that would severely undermine his credibility. FTR I don’t think he was doing that and that he really believes what he wrote, but some of you should think before trying to pounce on other posters
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:54 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
The Patriots don't rely on a committee sitting behind closed doors to put them in the Super Bowl.
Oh so Ohio State's recent natty was bullshite b/c they relied on a committee to stick them in? Glad to see you admit tOSU didn't deserve to be in the playoff that year.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:57 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
How dare they try and convince people that their product is worth watching!
The CFB national title game is one of the most well known sporting events in the country.
Don’t you find it a little peculiar that ESPN has to write an article (not a 15 second ad mind you) to tell us why this is worth watching?
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:59 pm to High C
quote:Sorry your team sucked
GTFO. I don’t know a single person who’s excited about this other than fans of the two teams, and most of them wish they were playing someone else. I absolutely love college football, but I don’t even know if I’m gonna watch this.
Nobody cares if you watch or not
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News