- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NYT just inadvertently blew up Avenatti’s FFFFF theory
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:02 pm to texridder
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:02 pm to texridder
quote:In that case aren't you pleased Christine Blasey-Ford will never be nominated to be on the SCOTUS???
I wouldn't back a person who was, at best, a serial liar for the Supreme Court.
1
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:02 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:You are giving Tex way too much credit.
It is people like you on the left that I can tell with 99.9% certainty that you have never been falsely accused of a criminal act whereby you are facing arrest and prison because if you had you would not be acting the way you...
Tex knows he's a lying sack of shite. He just doesn't care. That's today's liberals for you. That's who they are. They believe EVERYTHING is OK to win.
Don't make the mistake of believing they are just wrong on this. They are not wrong. They know they're lying. The WANT to lie.
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:04 pm to texridder
quote:
I wouldn't back a person who was, at best, a serial liar for the Supreme Court.
I agree with this assessment, which is why YOU would never be a member of the Supreme Court if I were in the Senate at the time of your hypothetical nomination.
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:04 pm to 31TIGERS
quote:
What do all of these toads have in common............?
Double consonants in their usernames except for Tigerindc?
They've never been invited to all night ragers at Squee's OR Tobin's?
No? How about being reeally reeeally ridiculously bad at trolling lately?
Or constantly being proven incorrect?
Or so rife with TDS that it's starting to eat away at their brains and muscles, much like rabies?
Or being notorious for posting like hemorrhaging front holes?
Or is it that they're so out of touch with reality that they actually believe in what they're espousing?
This post was edited on 10/7/18 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:05 pm to texridder
I don't give a shite what it meant. The guy was a in high school. Think about all the stupid shite you said in did in high school. I mean, truly silly shite.
The facts are that there was absolutely ZERO evidence to support any accusation made against Kavanaugh. None. None at all. All there was was an accusation from a woman with a conveniently poor memory.
I don't care if he wrote "frick em. and feed em fish heads" in his damn yearbook. Seriously, I don't, and it's stupid as shite that anyone does.
The facts are that there was absolutely ZERO evidence to support any accusation made against Kavanaugh. None. None at all. All there was was an accusation from a woman with a conveniently poor memory.
I don't care if he wrote "frick em. and feed em fish heads" in his damn yearbook. Seriously, I don't, and it's stupid as shite that anyone does.
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:13 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
They believe EVERYTHING is OK to win.
Like not having Mark Judge at the hearing?
Like keeping the FBI from interviewing Ford and Kavanaugh in its "investigation"?
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:15 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
You are giving Tex way too much credit.
He will go down with the ship before admitting being wrong.
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:16 pm to LSURussian
quote:
In that case aren't you pleased Christine Blasey-Ford will never be nominated to be on the SCOTUS???
Whataboutism 101.
quote:
I wouldn't back a person who was, at best, a serial liar for the Supreme Court.
What is your excuse?
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:19 pm to Scruffy
quote:
That was written by Brett Kavanaugh himself? With his own hands?
Yep. He was out of town for the weekend so he had to write that note.
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:20 pm to texridder
quote:
Whataboutism
Playing the whataboutism card is just a weak attempt to deflect from the fact(s)...
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:20 pm to upgrayedd
quote:The only source that anyone can find is 4Fs.
no one has any evidence of the Avenatti theory besides Avenatti's tweet.
That “letter” has 5Fs.
They can’t count.
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:21 pm to texridder
I don't lie, snowflake. That's your shtick....along with posting like a 13 year old school girl.
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:23 pm to Scruffy
quote:
The only source that anyone can find is 4Fs.
That “letter” has 5Fs.
They can’t count.
Counting is a tool of the patriarchy to discount the stories of rape survivors
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:24 pm to texridder
quote:They both had testified before the senate judiciary committee for several hours where both had answered several dozen questions.
Like keeping the FBI from interviewing Ford and Kavanaugh in its "investigation"?
What questions would the FBI have asked that they had not already answered under oath?
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:29 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
Why do people actually fall for this.....person's.....trolling like they'll change their mind?
This one is so far stuck up their own arse that they can see daylight through their esophagus like a light at the end of a tunnel, you won't convince him/her to change.
Just give up and watch as it slithers away elsewhere.
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:29 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
Playing the whataboutism card is just a weak attempt to deflect from the fact(s)...
Most inane post of the week.
What do you think a whataboutism does?
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:32 pm to texridder
can you give me some evidence that backs your theory of what FFFFF means?
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:32 pm to texridder
50-48
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:36 pm to texridder
quote:
Most inane post of the week.
Each one of your fricking post is inane...
quote:
What do you think a whataboutism does?
For people like you who play the whataboutism card it keeps you from actually acknowledging your hypocrisy...
Posted on 10/7/18 at 12:38 pm to LSURussian
quote:
What questions would the FBI have asked that they had not already answered under oath?
All the questions he dodged at the hearing.
For one example:
Q: Do you have a drinking problem?
A: Do you have a drinking problem, Senator?
They could have asked him questions about the July 1st entry on his calendar.
They could have asked him about the letter he signed
FFFFF,
Bart
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News