Started By
Message

re: A little known law allowed AG Lynch to approve the FISA warrant and bypass the courts.

Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:07 am to
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
148183 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:07 am to
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:08 am to
We don't care if this is fake news!!

Let's ignore that and attack the poster that points it out!!



I hope all your teams win today, you idiots
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
29062 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:15 am to
That’s it.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:16 am to
quote:

We don't care if this is fake news!!

Let's ignore that and attack the poster that points it out!!



Now you are reduced to gibberish

Your side spied on its political opponents and tried to steal an election. Deal with it.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
29062 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:18 am to
And there’s some filth spewing stupidity. Corrupt piece of shite.
Posted by WizardSleeve
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2011
1805 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:18 am to
I wil also add that Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton met on that Phoenix tarmac on June 27, 2016, only a few months before all of this. I have never considered that this was something they discussed. I figured it would have solely been about the Hillary email server investigation.

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111803 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:40 am to
At this point you know that there was huge ethical lapses in the FISC that issued the warrants for Trump associates. And you don’t care.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112945 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:42 am to
He's a staunch libertarian bro, he's got no dog in this fight!
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46727 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:51 am to
quote:

I wil also add that Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton met on that Phoenix tarmac on June 27, 2016, only a few months before all of this. I have never considered that this was something they discussed. I figured it would have solely been about the Hillary email server investigation.


That meeting probably involved Hilldawg's email scandal and the Steele Dossier. Bill Kristol wrote an article in July of 2016 referencing the dossier so I'm sure Lynch already had knowledge of the fake document weeks before Kristol was leaked info about the dossier. Lynch was probably assuring Slick not to worry, Team Swamper/Obammy has this one baw.
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 8:55 am to
quote:

GumboPot


So, I posted this in another thread, about your comment that the FISA judge was female:
She's the chief judge. There are only 3 FISC judges in DC. One of them is Rudolph 'Rudy' Contreras, a friend of Strzok.

And this leads to more oddities with this story:
"A source tells the Journal all four FBI requests were reviewed by four different judges" This would be impossible given there are only 3 of them in DC.

"Judge Rudolph Contreras is a FISA judge and the original DC circuit presiding judge who accepted the Mike Flynn plea (Dec. 1, 2017) and then ‘was recused’ five days later."

"Either the WSJ source is incorrect, or the greater likelihood is the DOJ was strategically approaching a different FISA judge each time." And going outside of DC to do it.


TCTH

It seems like, from what you've posted, that we may now understand where the 4th signature came from. Or, perhaps more than one of the signatures came from Lynch?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119661 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Except everybody's seen the actual application



Link? I’d like to read it unredacted.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
66574 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 9:41 am to
Is it possible a judge left and a new judge filled the void? Thus 4 judges approved but only because of rotating a new judge into one of the 3 seats.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119661 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 9:42 am to
quote:

So, I posted this in another thread, about your comment that the FISA judge was female:
She's the chief judge. There are only 3 FISC judges in DC. One of them is Rudolph 'Rudy' Contreras, a friend of Strzok.


Right. Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. Everyone assumes that it was Collyer that was the presiding judge over the FISA warrant because of Devin Nunes’ request for documents from the judicial branch where she replied “get with the justice department and let me know what you find out”. The response to Nuese in her letter just adds to the evidence that Lynch used this “emergency” rule to sign off on the initial FISA warrant and allow Obama to tap Trump’s wires.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28095 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 9:59 am to
quote:


7. OBAMA formally accused Russia of meddling in the Presidential election.

Which is confirmation that the man knew about the wiretaps

You don't simply go from "the 90s wants its foreign policy back" to accusing the Russians from infiltrating an election in 4 years, without proof, And since we have ZERO evidence that Trump and staff had any contact with any Russian hacking, this is the "insurance policy". And Obama was the trigger
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Link? I’d like to read it unredacted.

The information pertinent to this fake news thread is unredacted

Otherwise, I guess you could call the failing NYT
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Is it possible a judge left and a new judge filled the void? Thus 4 judges approved but only because of rotating a new judge into one of the 3 seats.


It is, but I'm not aware of any departures.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119661 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 10:15 am to
quote:

The information pertinent to this fake news thread is unredacted


Please snip or link the identity of the presiding judge and post here.

Even if she signed off on it the rule that allows Lynch an emergency warrant gives more reason for the idea that the judicial branch subsequently rubber-stamped the warrant after Lynch’s approval.

ETA: it’s been assumed all along that Collyer was the presiding judge because that is who Nunes addressed the judicial ranch in his letter. This may not be the case.
This post was edited on 9/1/18 at 10:22 am
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105567 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 10:21 am to
quote:

He's a staunch libertarian bro


It amazes me how many of the posters always defending the liberal politicians and their agenda, are Independent and Libertarian.

The Libertarian in here is even defending the abuse of the FISA Warrants, and is in full spin and defensive mode.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 10:31 am to
Page 412

Signed,
Raymond J Dearie
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

Let's put this to bed
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119661 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Page 412

Signed,
Raymond J Dearie
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

Let's put this to bed


What was the date?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram