Started By
Message
locked post

The Democrats' Latest Ploy to Obstruct Kavanaugh's Confirmation

Posted on 8/27/18 at 5:11 am
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
61998 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 5:11 am
CNSNEWS


quote:

Democrats figure that if they can't yet get enough impeachment traction from the Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort cases, they'll at least be able to delay Judge Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court.



quote:

They have cried wolf so many times that when they swerve into something they pray has some teeth, they can barely contain their glee, which they attempt to disguise as grave concern for the republic.



quote:

Having no legitimate reason to object to Kavanaugh's appointment, Democrats seek the next best thing — to obstruct by deception, delaying his confirmation hearings until after the midterm elections, in which they hope to gain the majority in the House so that they can commence their already planned impeachment proceedings.



quote:

The composition of the Supreme Court is not a matter of what a president "deserves." Nominating someone to the high court is not some kind of naked political reward governed solely by the president's whims. And yes, it's the president's constitutional power to appoint justices, but the Senate's confirmation decision should turn on the nominee's qualifications and fitness, not the president's approval ratings.



quote:

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, upon hearing the news of Cohen's guilty pleas, breathlessly exclaimed, "It's a game changer. ... In my view, the Senate Judiciary Committee should immediately pause the consideration of the Kavanaugh nomination."
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65111 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 5:19 am to
Hmmm. So now we see why Cohen plead to a crime that doesn’t exist?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135260 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 5:54 am to
quote:

Having no legitimate reason to object to Kavanaugh's appointment, Democrats seek the next best thing — to obstruct by deception, delaying his confirmation hearings until after the midterm elections, in which they hope to gain the majority in the House so that they can commence their already planned impeachment proceedings.
Sorry. That makes no sense whatsoever. House consideration of impeachment is a House concern. SCOTUS confirmation is a Senate concern. Schumer may be coming unhinged.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 5:56 am to
CNS News

Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:01 am to
quote:

to obstruct by deception, delaying his confirmation hearings until after the midterm elections


something something goose and gander.

Thank you for starting this Republicans, it always was going to boomerang, kinda like the Dems dumb arse starting the nuclear option.

Its like neither group of assholes can see past the end of their nose, the Dems are simply trying to use this for leverage to get out the vote exactly like the Reps did in 2016 and it is a shitty move both times.

We the people elect folks to do their job, not wait it out for more favorable conditions to get their way like over indulged children.

Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
15748 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:12 am to

They’re fricking dirty, no two ways about it. As much as I hate reading stuff like this because it gives me a tightening ball of anger in my gut that I have to constantly suppress and inevitably turn into some sort of cancerous tumor, I genuinely hope they keep this shite up and continue to get exponentially more rabid over obtaining their revenge by any means necessary all the way to midterms.

Not because I want to prevent my 9 future intestinal cancer removal surgeries, I’ll take those for the team. It’s because despite what they think, there’s A LOT of ‘normies,’ fence-sitters, and even moderate libs seeing just how far these sore losers are willing to go (i.e. subverting the democracy this country was founded on and politically assassinating a duly elected president) and it’s horrifying them into RUNNING STRAIGHT OVER TO THE SIDE OF COMMON SENSE, RATIONALITY, AND DECENCY. A sort of “quiet refuge” from the Democrat’s land of eternal chaos and over-the-top personal politics, if you will.

I know a few of our residents from the Dem side will reply to this post, specifically the “common sense, rationality, and decency” part because it’s easy pickins to say something along the lines of Trump not possessing those qualities or some predictable bullshite; or they’ll quote the part about moderates running away from the dem party and say “hurr durr LINK?”

Well to preemptively respond to your shitty comments-in-waiting - who do you think looks more unhinged and dangerous to our country right now, viewed from the lens of the casual observer: TRUMP - or - DEMOCRATS AND THEIR OBSESSION WITH “TAKING HIM DOWN AT ALL COSTS”

Methinks you’ll see the obvious answer and steer clear of answering honestly for some reason, not much faith left within I suppose. If you answered honestly (you see internally confused Dems, THAT’S what that feeling feels like!) and chose DEMOCRATS but still want to affirm your suspicion, there’s plenty of examples and firsthand accounts of individuals leaving the Dem party or becoming too afraid for the future of our democracy to ever support their agenda alllllllllll throughout the endless reaches of the internet, go have fun with it even!
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
61998 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:12 am to
I noticed you didn't try to refute the article, but instead, simply posted something to deflect.
Do you have anything substanative to add?
This post was edited on 8/27/18 at 6:16 am
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:30 am to
quote:

Thank you for starting this Republicans, it always was going to boomerang, kinda like the Dems dumb arse starting the nuclear option.



Jesus God Damned Christ they did not start this.

The Democrats explicitly told George Bush sometime around 2007 that they would not consider anybody he nominated for the Supreme Court and would wait until after the election.

The ONLY reason they didn't follow through is nobody died.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:32 am to
***
This post was edited on 8/27/18 at 6:34 am
Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:41 am to
I agree with schumer on this one.
Wont make a lick of difference, the vote is going to happen, but i agree with him.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
18518 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:49 am to
They cant stop the vote timeline and they dont have the votes to prevent him from being the next SCJ.

Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
21057 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:50 am to
quote:

delaying his confirmation hearings until after the midterm elections, in which they hope to gain the majority in the House so that they can commence their already planned impeachment proceedings.


Sounds like a knowing scheme to influence an election. Time to investigate them all.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81663 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:56 am to
Look like another left wing beta boi in our midst
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
15748 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:56 am to
quote:

AggieHank86


There’s an old Chinese proverb that’s perfectly fitting for your response:

“If you can’t attack the information because it’s based upon on-the-nose quotes that can’t be misunderstood in any way and taken directly from the speaker themselves multiple times through many different mediums and forums then attack the source of the information”

Are you trying to deny that Democrats are making various plays to obstruct Kavanaugh’s confirmation in order to postpone it until - at least - after midterms? Or are you really just trying to hide that you don’t like the way it makes you and your party look?
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
38649 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 6:58 am to
The GOP started this??? The name Robert Bork ring a bell?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56044 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:15 am to
The GOP started the Biden rule? (BTW, this is a step much further than the Biden rule). Oh and Bork was before all of this.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:44 am to
quote:

The Democrats explicitly told George Bush sometime around 2007 that they would not consider anybody he nominated for the Supreme Court and would wait until after the election.


Can you link a credible source on this?
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
47819 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:46 am to
quote:

I agree with schumer on this one.
Wont make a lick of difference, the vote is going to happen, but i agree with him.


What exactly are you agreeing with Schumer on??

And why??
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68460 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:48 am to
quote:

The Democrats' Latest Failed Ploy to Obstruct Kavanaugh's Confirmation

FIFY
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:49 am to
quote:

The GOP started this??? The name Robert Bork ring a bell?


Bork was not stalled dipshit, what happened to him has been going on since 1776.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram