Started By
Message
locked post

Lisa Lisa getting some GOP love

Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:02 pm
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:02 pm
Lisa Lisa answered questions Petey refused to answer.

@mkraju


Lisa Page is impressing GOP lawmakers today. Several members have said she had been cooperative and provided them new information beyond Strzok’s testimony.
Mark Meadows even went so far as to say that Page was “falsely accused” of not being cooperative.
4:33 PM - Jul 13, 2018

@kyledcheney


Rep. Ratcliffe says Lisa PAGE answered many questions Strzok didn’t and that lawmakers learned a lot of new information. He declined to provide any other details.
3:51 PM - Jul 13, 2018

@kyledcheney

Rep. Gaetz says the questions Lisa Page answered — but Strzok would not — heighten his concern about whether the FBI was driving toward a “desired outcome” in its Russia probe.

He said FBI counsel was still there and at times intervened to prevent her from answering.
4:09 PM - Jul 13, 2018

LINK
Posted by FourThinInches
Dallas
Member since Apr 2012
1309 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:03 pm to
She didn't look too bad in pics taken when she wasn't smiling
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
49172 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Rep. Gaetz says the questions Lisa Page answered — but Strzok would not — heighten his concern about whether the FBI was driving toward a “desired outcome” in its Russia probe.



Accurate.

Does she not have the attorneys in the FBI representing her as well? You would think she would and that she would be getting the same advice.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69953 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:04 pm to



Hell hath no fury like a mistress scorned
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:05 pm to
She did have FBI attorneys present, they blocked her from answering some questions.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30172 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

e said FBI counsel was still there and at times intervened to prevent her from answering. 4:09 PM - Jul 13, 2018


This is interesting to me. Why would FBI attorneys be counciling her on what not to say? Isn’t their loyalty to the FBI? And why are they needing the hide things from a govt oversight committee? I get that it isn’t true but shouldn’t they at least pretend to all be on the same team?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

This is interesting to me. Why would FBI attorneys be counciling her on what not to say? Isn’t their loyalty to the FBI? And why are they needing the hide things from a govt oversight committee? I get that it isn’t true but shouldn’t they at least pretend to all be on the same team?
They did the same thing with that jerk off Strzok.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17086 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

This is interesting to me. Why would FBI attorneys be counciling her on what not to say? Isn’t their loyalty to the FBI?


Strzok at least had an excuse for the FBI attorneys. He is still technically an employee. Page resigned months ago, so why does she have FBI lawyers?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Strzok at least had an excuse for the FBI attorneys. He is still technically an employee
They kept him employed so they could block as much of his testimony as possible.

quote:

Page resigned months ago, so why does she have FBI lawyers?
The only thing they could block would be classified info or "active" investigation info.
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19748 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:23 pm to
How about the Cult Jam?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

How about the Cult Jam?
That would be Attorney #1 and 2 with Agent #1 and 2
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30172 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Page resigned months ago, so why does she have FBI lawyers?


Excellent point and proof positive of FBI guilt/coverup.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147957 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Page resigned months ago, so why does she have FBI lawyers?


Excellent point and proof positive of FBI guilt/coverup.
this and this and this
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26996 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Does she not have the attorneys in the FBI representing her as well?


Yes, but unlike Strzok, she is no longer an FBI employee. The FBI attorney was there, but she is under no obligation whatsoever to listen to him.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48670 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 4:32 pm to
Good, I'm glad she's getting some good publicity now, if she's cooperating.

I'm not going to hate on Lisa Page just because she hates Trump. I will hate on her if she used her official FedGov time and position to abuse her authority and power.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

I'm not going to hate on Lisa Page just because she hates Trump. I will hate on her if she used her official FedGov time and position to abuse her authority and power.
Her, Petey, Ohr, and Andy were pulling some shite. Her probably to a lesser degree.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48670 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 5:04 pm to
Those FBI assholes like strzok, mccabe and comey were definitely abusing their offices. Page, I don't know.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Those FBI assholes like strzok, mccabe and comey were definitely abusing their offices. Page, I don't know.
Agree.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14269 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 5:16 pm to
A convenient way for Republicans to discredit Strzok without fear of being challenged because there is no transcript. Just like they did after Strzok's closed testimony.

This means nothing until they release the transcript.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 7/14/18 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

This means nothing until they release the transcript.
You know why Dems demand his transcript be released? Because it's got the classified in it, they know it won't be released. It gives water heads hope for impeachment.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram