- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I'm new to the QAnon Stuff
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:04 pm
So, as the title of the thread states, I'm new to this QAnon fella and have done a good bit of research. Obviously it quite often leads down a rabbit hole of craziness that I just don't have time to follow.
My question is simple, yet complicated all at the same time. How credible is the information Q puts out? Have there been "predictions" that have been accurate? I get there a ton of "coincidences", but just how deep does this thing go and what kind of credibility is there?
My question is simple, yet complicated all at the same time. How credible is the information Q puts out? Have there been "predictions" that have been accurate? I get there a ton of "coincidences", but just how deep does this thing go and what kind of credibility is there?
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:07 pm to ibleedprplngld
No one can give you a satisfactory answer. Unfortunately, much of the Q stuff requires a lot of long-term patience and attentiveness to verify. I, at least, have no idea whether it's a LARP, a psy-op, or /ourguy/.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:09 pm to ibleedprplngld
You couldn't read the four or so threads on this subject that have been started this week?
Let me sum it up for you. People who are into Q also swear up and down that democrats rape children in non-existent pizza basements(see Bamarep). If that describes you, then dive right in.
Let me sum it up for you. People who are into Q also swear up and down that democrats rape children in non-existent pizza basements(see Bamarep). If that describes you, then dive right in.
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:26 pm to ibleedprplngld
I was willing to listen to the talk of Q being sorta legit previously, but not after this week.
When Q pimped the kid in the Q shirt as something preplanned he gave himself away as a fraud.
If you watch the video Trump is clearly pointing at the woman in the red shirt.
Q got cocky and tried to play that too much.
Anybody that still listens to Q after that should be laughed at ruthlessly.
When Q pimped the kid in the Q shirt as something preplanned he gave himself away as a fraud.
If you watch the video Trump is clearly pointing at the woman in the red shirt.
Q got cocky and tried to play that too much.
Anybody that still listens to Q after that should be laughed at ruthlessly.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:51 pm to ibleedprplngld
quote:
QAnon fella
bamarep posted a picture of "him"(?) at a Trump rally...he's not really a "fella". It looked more like a sexually ambiguous fatty: LINK
quote:
How credible is the information Q puts out?
As credible as:
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:51 pm to ibleedprplngld
I only check the 2000+ pg Q thread once in a while, and don't otherwise follow Q at all. So, take what I say with a grain of salt.
First, I'll assume that those saying Q has predicted things ahead of time in a way would've been difficult without insider knowledge are correct. I can't back that up, but have gotten that impression from some of the posters in the Q thread. I'll accept that at face value.
It's also worth noting that some of the same posters that give credence to Q have stated that there is some wrong info in Q's posts... their take seems to be that this is intentional disinformation that makes it harder for deep state or enemy operatives to track Q down. Is this true? Who knows. But it directly suggests Q is sometimes wrong-- intentional or not. In fairness, no matter how good intel might be, developing situations tend to be fluid and subject to change depending on changing variables. So it's possible Q makes predictions based on good intel, but then a variable or two changes making the outcome not consistent with the prediction.
Bottom line: Based on casually following Q on the poliboard here only, the info (predictions) Q has provided has a less than 50% chance of coming to fruition or--in fairness-- has yet to come to fruition. This may be intentional or not, but it means any particular piece of info should be taken with a grain of salt.
On the face of it, this might sound negative. But I don't mean it that way. Q goes out on a limb... sort of like a home run hitter who hits it out the park a lot, but also strikes out a lot.
imho, the purpose of Q is to shed a little light on obscure events & players that have influence on world events. I don't think there's any harm at all in following him/her unless doing so would make you act irrationally in your day to day life. Assuming you're stable, Q can be at least entertaining, if not genuinely informative.
First, I'll assume that those saying Q has predicted things ahead of time in a way would've been difficult without insider knowledge are correct. I can't back that up, but have gotten that impression from some of the posters in the Q thread. I'll accept that at face value.
It's also worth noting that some of the same posters that give credence to Q have stated that there is some wrong info in Q's posts... their take seems to be that this is intentional disinformation that makes it harder for deep state or enemy operatives to track Q down. Is this true? Who knows. But it directly suggests Q is sometimes wrong-- intentional or not. In fairness, no matter how good intel might be, developing situations tend to be fluid and subject to change depending on changing variables. So it's possible Q makes predictions based on good intel, but then a variable or two changes making the outcome not consistent with the prediction.
Bottom line: Based on casually following Q on the poliboard here only, the info (predictions) Q has provided has a less than 50% chance of coming to fruition or--in fairness-- has yet to come to fruition. This may be intentional or not, but it means any particular piece of info should be taken with a grain of salt.
On the face of it, this might sound negative. But I don't mean it that way. Q goes out on a limb... sort of like a home run hitter who hits it out the park a lot, but also strikes out a lot.
imho, the purpose of Q is to shed a little light on obscure events & players that have influence on world events. I don't think there's any harm at all in following him/her unless doing so would make you act irrationally in your day to day life. Assuming you're stable, Q can be at least entertaining, if not genuinely informative.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 3:09 pm to ibleedprplngld
Posted on 6/22/18 at 3:15 pm to ibleedprplngld
quote:
How credible is the information Q puts out?
Not credible at all. It's made up bullshite.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 4:31 pm to ibleedprplngld
It's bullshite, don't waste your time. Still waiting for Hillary's arrest from last Fall. But then I was told he'd have to be wrong about things in order to not blow his cover. So when he's right, if he's ever been right, he's brilliant and when he's wrong, it's purposeful. And people lap that foolishness up.
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 4:46 pm to ibleedprplngld
LINK
Recent write up
Decide for yourself
quote:
THE STORY OF Q
Who is the anonymous online poster claiming to be a high-level administration official? And can he or she bring us some much-needed truth in an era of fake news?
By Ted Mann June 19, 2018 • 1:30 PM
Recent write up
Decide for yourself
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 4:52 pm to ibleedprplngld
quote:about as accurate as your local palm reader
How credible is the information Q puts out?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News