- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
It appears that Zuckerberg lied to Congress
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:17 pm
Zuck claims that FB has contacted Diamond and Silk. DS says FB has NOT contacted them. Was Zuck under oath? Can Congress have him arrested for perjury? He told a blatant lie when he was on the hotseat.
Approx 45 Obama people are now working at FB.
Should Congress pass a law to fine FB up to $1 million per day for reducing traffic to a FB page or removing a person's FB page if an investigation proves there was no just cause;therefore, FB discriminated against a person(s)?
This is a violation of Freedom of speech. The FB platform is a Freedom of speech platform.
DS has a right for other people to hear their voice. FB is discriminating against DS because they are conservative.
LINK
Cruz said that “there are a great many Americans who, I think, are deeply concerned that Facebook and other tech companies are engaged in a pervasive pattern of bias and political censorship.” Cruz noted that Diamond and Silk, sisters who have become famous for their pro-Trump videos, recently said that their Facebook page was blocked after the site determined it to be “unsafe to the community.”
Approx 45 Obama people are now working at FB.
Should Congress pass a law to fine FB up to $1 million per day for reducing traffic to a FB page or removing a person's FB page if an investigation proves there was no just cause;therefore, FB discriminated against a person(s)?
This is a violation of Freedom of speech. The FB platform is a Freedom of speech platform.
DS has a right for other people to hear their voice. FB is discriminating against DS because they are conservative.
LINK
Cruz said that “there are a great many Americans who, I think, are deeply concerned that Facebook and other tech companies are engaged in a pervasive pattern of bias and political censorship.” Cruz noted that Diamond and Silk, sisters who have become famous for their pro-Trump videos, recently said that their Facebook page was blocked after the site determined it to be “unsafe to the community.”
This post was edited on 4/11/18 at 11:29 pm
21
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:18 pm to djmicrobe
He wasn't under oath.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:18 pm to djmicrobe
He wasn’t under oath. It was just a dog and pony show.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:19 pm to djmicrobe
I did not watch, but I believe the reports were that he would not be under oath. Very strange considering the baseball players testifying about steroids were.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:21 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
This is a violation of Freedom of speech.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:22 pm to djmicrobe
As Roger Stone said politics is show business for ugly people, and these "hearings" are their red carpet.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:22 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
He wasn’t under oath. It was just a dog and pony show.
A fake dossier creates a SC and everyone who ever knew Trump are being place under oath; however, HRC had people destroy evidence, and they were given immunity.
Zuck is CEO of FB, and his company is harassing pro-Trump people and conservatives, but he is not placed under oath.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:22 pm to djmicrobe
Take it FWIW, but when I was listening to CNBC on Tuedsay, they said he was "sworn in in another room before entering the main hall"
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:23 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
This is a violation of Freedom of speech. The FB platform is a Freedom of speech platform
Wht are posters so fricking stupid?
The govt can punish you or deny you free speech.
There are literally thousands of social networking sites.
Facebook made a business decision and the last time I checked private companies can do best by acting and removing risk factors. That Facebook group delisted is incompatible with their business model.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:23 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
He wasn't under oath.
Does 18 USC 1001 require he be under oath?
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:25 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
This is a violation of Freedom of speech.
The First Amendment prevents government from making laws prohibiting the freedom of speech. GOVERNMENT. Facebook is not the government.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:29 pm to djmicrobe
quote:Under what law?
Should Congress fine FB up to $1 million per day for reducing traffic to a FB page
quote:
This is a violation of Freedom of speech.
The government can't abridge free speech. Facebook is not the government. 
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:31 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
This is a violation of Freedom of speech.
It is due to the way they market themselves
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:32 pm to djmicrobe
Why does he seem to act the lackey. The front man or stooge?
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:34 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
Zuck claims that FB has contacted Diamond and Silk. DS says FB has NOT contacted them.
Well I’m convinced. Lock him up!!
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:37 pm to starsandstripes
Doesn't read like it does.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:37 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Wht are posters so fricking stupid?
word
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:37 pm to djmicrobe
There can be little productive discussion of this as long as these actions by FB are being billed as a freedom of speech issue. There is a discussion to be had here but not a 1A discussion.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:43 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
Doesn't read like it does.
Agree.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News