- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should Cleveland take Barkley at 1 and Chubb at 4?
Posted on 3/22/18 at 12:54 am to fightingtigers98
Posted on 3/22/18 at 12:54 am to fightingtigers98
quote:
Should Cleveland take Barkley at 1 and Chubb at 4?
not no, but hell no
why take a QB worse than Tyrod Taylor, getting 0 improvement with the number 1 overall pick? then follow it up and take the most easily replaceable position in football with the number 4 overall pick?
2
Posted on 3/22/18 at 12:56 am to CelticDog
quote:
I would take Allen at 4. Supposedly a ten year starter at rt guard. Chubb at 1. Go with sure things. Both lines improve.
this is a great suggestion
Posted on 3/22/18 at 12:58 am to gthog61
quote:
got a line - an above average RB will gain 1200 yards, average one good for 800-900 no line, doesn't matter exhibit A - Demarco Murray
i dont even think the difference would be as big as 1200 to 900 yards, more like 1200 to 1050 yards between a good and average back
Posted on 3/22/18 at 2:43 am to fightingtigers98
Beat 2 qbs availiable then flip one for more picks
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:35 am to mikeboss550
quote:
Beat 2 qbs availiable then flip one for more picks
So, use a top five pick to select a guy only to destine him to the bench, then a few years later, trade him away for something that most certainly won’t be a top five pick?
What’s funny is I could actually see the Browns doing something like that.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:40 am to fightingtigers98
quote:
Should Cleveland take Barkley at 1 and Chubb at 4?
That would make a case for dumbest draft in Browns' history.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:43 am to sgallo3
quote:
Barkley
quote:
QB worse than Tyrod Taylor
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:43 am to sgallo3
quote:
why take a QB worse than Tyrod Taylor, getting 0 improvement with the number 1 overall pick? then follow it up and take the most easily replaceable position in football with the number 4 overall pick?
None of what you said makes any sense. Barkley isn't a QB and for the 15th time in this thread, this question is about Bradley Chubb, not Nick.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:48 am to VADawg
He clearly thinks Darnold is Matt Barkley.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:51 am to Maximus
So what I've gathered in this thread is that Cleveland should trade the #1 pick for Matt Barkley and draft Nick Chubb at #4 
Posted on 3/22/18 at 10:09 am to Maximus
quote:
He clearly thinks Darnold is Matt Barkley.
Holy crap I think you’re right.
It’s still an error-ridden mess of a post but at least it makes sense now
Posted on 3/22/18 at 10:22 am to Suntiger
quote:
If I was Cleveland I’d take Chubb with the 1st pack, take Tremaine Edmunds, Quenton Nelson or Minkah Fitzpatrick with the 4th pick and take Derrius Guice with thier 2nd round pick if they want a RB.
They need to make thier team talent overall better. A QB isn’t going to do that, and I don’t think there is that can miss QB this year.
And we've already seen that building a defense can lead a mediocre QB to success. I think they should trade back that 4th pick if they can get two more firsts to try to solidify the defense and offensive line
Posted on 3/22/18 at 10:32 am to fightingtigers98
Posted on 3/22/18 at 10:43 am to fightingtigers98
I would take Barkley and Chubb and go for Foles or Keenum in the market
Posted on 3/22/18 at 10:50 am to SammyTiger
quote:because they do
Why take a pass catching back when you don’t have a QB.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:14 am to VADawg
quote:
QB at 1, Chubb at 4 if he's there. You can never have too much pass rush. They've kicked the can on QB too many times. They're in prime position right now. Don't get cute.
I agree except none of these QBs are anything close to a sure thing.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 12:14 pm to RandySavage
Having watched Chubb play the past couple of years, I am not sold on him as a top 5 pick. He is strong at the point of attack, but doesn't have that quick twitch you want in a top 10 DE pick. It's a very weak DE draft overall. Next year is a different story.
I would take Darnold or Rosen at 1, and follow it up with the best OL available.
I would take Darnold or Rosen at 1, and follow it up with the best OL available.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 3:27 pm to CivilTiger83
I’d do anything I can to trade back with one or two of those first two. If the Browns can land four first round picks then it helps them dramatically. Top picks are busts often enough that two firsts is a solid hedge.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 4:08 pm to fightingtigers98
They have to take a QB at #1. You don't win shite in the NFL without an elite QB. I'm talking about playoffs and championships. If they think one of them is that guy you have to take them. Personally I'd take Mayfield. Not convinced Darnold or Rosen are better
Posted on 3/22/18 at 5:43 pm to fightingtigers98
I honestly don't like any of the QBs this year. Barkley and Chubb are as close to locks as it gets apart from elite guards/centers.
If the point is to stack great players up and wait for the right QB, it's not a terrible idea.
If the point is to stack great players up and wait for the right QB, it's not a terrible idea.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News