Started By
Message

re: Should Cleveland take Barkley at 1 and Chubb at 4?

Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:48 am to
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
51966 posts
Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:48 am to
All I know is that whoever takes Darnold better have an O-line. He gets happy feet and murdered without one.
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
29018 posts
Posted on 3/20/18 at 10:51 am to
Uhh they already have Carlos Hyde
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
15130 posts
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:03 am to
Barkley and Chubb in addition to Landry could at least give them a chance for a winning season.

Darnold and Rosen are a couple of the most "meh" QBs to be graded so high in quite some time. Plus Darnold is a turnover machine.

Baker has the highest ceiling - Barkley at 1 is a no-brainer. Should come down to Baker or Chubb at 4.
Posted by BenDover
Member since Jul 2010
5463 posts
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:58 am to
I think you go Chubb at 1 and Baker at 4 if he’s there. If not, go with Nelson or trade out.

A team is guaranteed one of Allen, Rosen, or Darnold at 4 if Chubb goes 1. At that point they’re going to get a king’s ransom by trading out
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 11:58 am
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38161 posts
Posted on 3/20/18 at 12:09 pm to
***
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 12:10 pm
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36567 posts
Posted on 3/20/18 at 4:58 pm to
just take two quarterbacks at 1 and 4. you've been so fricking inept for years at doing it, double your chances.

i cant decide if im kidding or not so you're not allowed to make fun of me
Posted by Tigers0891
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2017
6790 posts
Posted on 3/20/18 at 4:58 pm to
So you think this guy has all pro written all over him and that he is really scary to go against but you wouldn't pick him until four?

An all pro defensive end is way more valuable than a running back no matter how good they are as far as franchise cornerstones go. Leveon Bell / Ezekiel Elliot or JJ Watt ? I know who I'm picking.
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
14332 posts
Posted on 3/20/18 at 9:49 pm to
Take QBs at both.

Your are nothing without a QB in this generations nfl.

They've been so shitty they should grab two and hope one works out for the next decade.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
69911 posts
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:01 pm to
Barkley’s good but part of his appeal is his versatility

Why take a pass catching back when you don’t have a QB.
Posted by MrBiriwa
Biriwa,OH
Member since Nov 2010
7116 posts
Posted on 3/21/18 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Should Cleveland take Barkley at 1 and Chubb at 4? by fightingtigers98



My ideal situation for the Browns is to take the QB they want at #1. Hopefully the Giants take Barkley or Nelson @ #2. That opens the door for a potential trade with Buffalo at 4 for their 2 first round picks #12 and #22 and on of their 2nd Rd picks at the very least. Also a 1st next year. Price will be high to move up 8 spots.

Then the Browns take Derwin James @ 12 and McGlinchey @ 22

Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25397 posts
Posted on 3/21/18 at 7:31 am to
This is a deep RB draft - taking Barkley #1 overall is a joke.

The Browns aren’t going to risk losing their top choice at QB. Picks 2 and 3 are going to be a QB bc the Giants are likely moving their pick.
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
33345 posts
Posted on 3/21/18 at 7:03 pm to
If I was Cleveland I’d take Chubb with the 1st pack, take Tremaine Edmunds, Quenton Nelson or Minkah Fitzpatrick with the 4th pick and take Derrius Guice with thier 2nd round pick if they want a RB.

They need to make thier team talent overall better. A QB isn’t going to do that, and I don’t think there is that can miss QB this year.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
17007 posts
Posted on 3/21/18 at 10:46 pm to
They should take Chubb at 1 and a QB at 4.

Very good RB will be available in the 2nd
Posted by sgallo3
Dorne
Member since Sep 2008
24749 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 12:54 am to
quote:

Should Cleveland take Barkley at 1 and Chubb at 4?


not no, but hell no

why take a QB worse than Tyrod Taylor, getting 0 improvement with the number 1 overall pick? then follow it up and take the most easily replaceable position in football with the number 4 overall pick?

Posted by mikeboss550
Member since Apr 2013
10711 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 2:43 am to
Beat 2 qbs availiable then flip one for more picks
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34650 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Should Cleveland take Barkley at 1 and Chubb at 4?


That would make a case for dumbest draft in Browns' history.
Posted by SlaughterDale
Slaughter
Member since Jan 2018
353 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 10:32 am to
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23896 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 10:43 am to
I would take Barkley and Chubb and go for Foles or Keenum in the market
Posted by Northshore Saint
Loranger, LA
Member since Feb 2013
1864 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 4:08 pm to
They have to take a QB at #1. You don't win shite in the NFL without an elite QB. I'm talking about playoffs and championships. If they think one of them is that guy you have to take them. Personally I'd take Mayfield. Not convinced Darnold or Rosen are better
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46631 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 5:43 pm to
I honestly don't like any of the QBs this year. Barkley and Chubb are as close to locks as it gets apart from elite guards/centers.

If the point is to stack great players up and wait for the right QB, it's not a terrible idea.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram