Started By
Message

re: Fulton halfway through a two-year suspension

Posted on 3/12/18 at 12:59 pm to
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65532 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Time to go O.

What a joke

wtf does Orgeron have to do with Fulton getting suspended?
This post was edited on 3/12/18 at 1:01 pm
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Once had a friend's piss in a travel shampoo squirt bottle taped to my gooch with hand warms around it. Worked though!


The procurement and actual travel all just seems so ungodly uncomfortable.




Yeah, he pissed in a cup and I had to pour it in the shampoo bottle. Got all over my hands

Then I was worried about temp being right. This little thermometer on the side of the cup kept rising after I squirted the piss in it. Thought I was going to have to explain why my piss was 105 degrees But it stopped at like 99ish thank god and they didn't notice or care.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

He should have seen the future and abandoned the recruitment of Surtain, then forced Fulton not to fail and tamper with a drug test


Orgeron has never seemed optimistic that Fulton would be back. He had to know.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32746 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

I see that people are still acting like Mario Goodrich could start as a freshman.

With this depth chart, he easily could start as a freshman.

We have 3 scholarship CB’s- Greedy, Jontre Kirlin and Kary Vincent.

You can add Kelvin Jospeh and Mannie Netherly now.

Mario would have without a doubt played a ton this year.
This post was edited on 3/12/18 at 1:10 pm
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

So basically, despite the fact we "lost" 5 CBs, 4 of which they had plenty of time to know was happening for recruiting...they were just fine signing Surtain OR Goodrich. And ended up with nobody. It's mind boggling bad roster management. The bare minimum requirement should have been to sign 2. Now we're left chasing after backups from other schools on the transfer market.


Still, Ree insists that they were only planning on taking one. I assume that's his stubbornness to admit any mistake on the part of Eaux.

I'd have to say that this being done intentionally is far worse than botching it.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

wtf does Orgeron have to do with Fulton getting suspended?



Not sure what that guy is referring to, but maybe its the fact Orgeron knew we were going to be severely deficient at the CB position and failed miserably at filling that need in recruiting, especially in a year we had extra spots at the end of signing day.

Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
39993 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Fulton had a 2 year suspension, yet CB depth wasn't addressed. That's kind of a glaring oversight.


Mind-boggling. Utterly inexcusable when considering O is an alleged "recruiting ace".
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
71092 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

wtf does Orgeron have to do with Fulton getting suspended?


His culpability in the suspension is exactly equal to the steps taken to mitigate the impact. Zero.
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38431 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Still, Ree insists that they were only planning on taking one. I assume that's his stubbornness to admit any mistake on the part of Eaux.


You call it stubbornness, I call it him being an idiot.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
71092 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Orgeron has never seemed optimistic that Fulton would be back. He had to know.


Except for that weekend when Fulton hosted Chase on the recruiting visit. There was a lot of positivity about his return at that time.

I'm sure that's just coincidence though.
Posted by geauxtigs999
Member since Aug 2017
682 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

I see people still convincing themselves that Zero's bull shite is OK.


No, he obviously screwed this up. They thought they were getting Surtain, and were arrogant about it.

But Goodrich wasn't going to be a savior for 2018.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:04 pm to
quote:



Except for that weekend when Fulton hosted Chase on the recruiting visit. There was a lot of positivity about his return at that time.

I'm sure that's just coincidence though.


Maybe that was just a facade for recruiting purposes?

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

But Goodrich wasn't going to be a savior for 2018.


Goodrich is going to be a very good CB at Clemson. Very good.

He's one of the top athletes in the country and would've competed for serious playing time at LSU.

Posted by crazyLSUstudent
391 miles away from Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2012
5544 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:05 pm to
bruh it was not for weed. He was probably on a cycle of test or something else similar and did not want to get caught
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
71092 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Maybe that was just a facade for recruiting purposes?


It absolutely was.
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68678 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

But Goodrich wasn't going to be a savior for 2018.



It's not about being a savior or not. It's about being that mind boggling blind that when you KNOW you're losing at least 4 players at a position you are perfectly fine with signing 1 guy there, if you end up with 2, great!

Again, would you rather Goodrich, a promising highly recruited talent, or some transfer who couldn't start somewhere for the past 3-4 years? I wonder who has the better shot at actually being good. A top notch elite young guy or someone who has proven for years in college they cant play at a high level.

At any rate, how do you know Goodrich couldn't play and be good this year? Did you think Etienne wouldn't be good or play much this year either? How about when all these freshmen HAVE come in and contributed here in meaningful ways previously?

Are we DBU or DBtransferU
This post was edited on 3/12/18 at 1:09 pm
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
41085 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:08 pm to
Fulton having to sit out games this year doesn’t do much to affect Chase one way or the other.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
43769 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:08 pm to
When is the SEC going to step in and make a conference policy on this

It's getting ridiculous that some schools play by the rules and suspend based on drug tests while others never have a violation but when they leave the university end up testing at NFL combines
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

When is the SEC going to step in and make a conference policy on this

It's getting ridiculous that some schools play by the rules and suspend based on drug tests while others never have a violation but when they leave the university end up testing at NFL combines


Again, this is the NCAA.

This is different and everyone in the country has the same rules and punishments.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18194 posts
Posted on 3/12/18 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

The NCAA is such a joke can't even imagine them putting Alabama thru this
and the Bama obsession continues...
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram