re: Can we not just all agree on one thing (gun control): Rex, since you're on, answer please

You googled you fricking hack.

quote:

---

The Second Amendment doesn't have to be repealed. It has to be returned to its true original intent before an activist right wing Supreme Court overturned 250 years of legal precedent and perverted its meaning.

---

Heller was a case of first impression, you f*cking moron.

Please cite for us the 250 years of Supreme Court precedence that Heller overturne.

quote:

---

what in the hell are more controls going to do?

---

create more loopholes and plausible deniability.

Nothing .

They will do nothing.

quote:

---

The true answer and the goal of the Leftist Globalists is this: abolition of the US Constitution's Second Amendment followed by international police force over-sight of the disarming of the population of the North American Continent formerly known as "nation-state United States of America."

---

Don't think they'd stop there! They are absolutely militant toward any speech that opposes their marxist world view as well. If you think about it, they only think the Bill of Rights applies to those who think their way. The 2A is just their primary target, because it's what prevents them from taking the rest from those who disagree.

I own my guns with the original intent.

I’ll play, since your thread has, like nearly all threads on this board, turned into a circle jerk of reaffirmation while you call out one poster like a schoolyard a-hole.

There isn’t a single statistic worldwide that supports your argument that more guns prevent crime. So many of you want to ignore Australia as an example of how to prevent these mass shootings, even though it is the most directly relevant example: first world, civilized, western society. You do this because you want your guns to prevent the tyranny of the government coming to take your home and your property.

The problem is that both sides have a good point, but not a single one of you are really interested in a legit discussion on it. The left wants your guns, the right refuses to give any of them up. The majority of you loathe public education and the teachers peddling it, but you want them armed to prevent this kind of stuff. If a cop trained to deal with a situation like this isn’t going to respond, you’re only going with odds in numbers that some teacher will react appropriately. Hopefully they’re all mentally stable and don’t decide to use the gun for any other reason. Hopefully they’re secured and some student having a really bad day can’t get access to one.

This still is and will continue to be a mental health discussion. But seeing as how funding and paying attention to mental illness isn’t a swanky enough cause to catch the attention of posters on this board, of the media, or politicians, you’ll continue to see the mentally ill react like this because they get attention and can easily get a gun. And the majority of posters here will still continue ranting about kids needing to grow up and toughen up.

At least until it happens at your child’s school. If your son or daughter gets caught in these crosshairs, your opinion will change quickly and you’ll be ready to take guns away.

quote:

---

The right wing's tactic:

- agree to laws that do just about nothing to stop gun massacres.
- then claim that we already have laws in place which don't help so why would additional laws make things any better?

It's specious. It's deceitful. It's the question the OP raised and to which gun nuts thought was so clever and on point.

---

Jump over in the Broward County Promise thread and defend their idiotic program that kept Cruz out of jail to "lower minority disproportionality" in juvenile arrests.

The left killed those children and coaches via the shitty program from their shitty leftwing sheriff's department and you are using YOUR frickup to attack those who had NOTHING to do with it.