- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:27 pm to NIH
quote:
What kind of guns do you own?
Flesh rockets
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:28 pm to navy
quote:
In California, a majority of voters voted against gay marriage.
How did that end?
We do not abolish Constitutional Rights just because some made up poll says so.
/thread
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:29 pm to navy
quote:
The majority still are ... just afraid to say so.
Meh, maybe in the Deep South, Oklahoma, etc. Doesn't matter.
quote:
Anyone with common sense and decency is disgusted by the ridiculous notion of two dudes being married.
Who is "anyone"? People with attitudes like this aren't even worth laughing at any more.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:29 pm to Toddy
Just demonstrates that people are susceptible to media pressure. Congrats, you have the support of brainless sheep.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:29 pm to Centinel
What the OP is saying is that public opinion could be shifting which will embolden those states municipalities who want restrictions to put more in place. I think he is right.
So the question will be how far they can push it. In the Heller case, while confirming the rights afforded under the, they left open that further restrictions could happen. That is very much what I took away
I am not saying further restrictions should happen or would any restrictions be considered be constitutional. I do think the OP is correct in saying that public opinion is likely shifting and that is going to put pressure on lawmakers to take action irrespective of what you or I may think.
So the question will be how far they can push it. In the Heller case, while confirming the rights afforded under the, they left open that further restrictions could happen. That is very much what I took away
I am not saying further restrictions should happen or would any restrictions be considered be constitutional. I do think the OP is correct in saying that public opinion is likely shifting and that is going to put pressure on lawmakers to take action irrespective of what you or I may think.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:31 pm to Centinel
quote:
Republican 22% Democrat 33%
Nice sampling bias you got going on there brosef
That matches the most recent data of party affiliation nationwide. Most recent poll from gallup was 22 R 33 D with the rest Ind.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:33 pm to Haughton99
quote:
Most recent poll from gallup was 22 R 33 D with the rest Ind.
A poll to justify the validity of a poll.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:34 pm to roadGator
the level of homophobia and the threats of violence Toddy has to put up with every single post he makes is appalling. if you people had any decency you'd be embarrassed, but you dont so naturally youre not.
does this kind of thing make you proud? is it cool? youre almost certainly christian, so is this what "jesus" would do? is this what "he" talked about?
does this kind of thing make you proud? is it cool? youre almost certainly christian, so is this what "jesus" would do? is this what "he" talked about?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:34 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
I do think the OP is correct in saying that public opinion is likely shifting and that is going to put pressure on lawmakers to take action irrespective of what you or I may think.
All one has to do is study public opinion about this for the past decade and how it has changed. I'm very well versed in this after the gay marriage fight. It's extraordinary how quickly public opinion can liberalize around contemporary issues.
The backlash we've witnessed this week is fascinating. Would have been unheard of just a few short years ago.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:36 pm to Toddy
polling people directly after an emotional national tragedy is a good way to skew the numbers to fit your agenda.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:36 pm to MastrShake
quote:
the level of homophobia and the threats of violence Toddy has to put up with every single post he makes is appalling.
Who threatened Toddy with violence?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:36 pm to Toddy
Yesterday you posted something similar with a sample size of 808 people. What was the sample size of this poll?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:36 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
And that tilt will rule in favor of individual rights on guns 5-4. Look at their history. Sorry Toddy.
Are you so naïve to believe that the SCOTUS doesn't monitor public opinion and changing attitudes when ruling?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:37 pm to Centinel
quote:
A poll to justify the validity of a poll.
Ok. If you want to show me some data that proves the sampling was wrong then I'd like to see it.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:37 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
A dick in my mouth would bother me a great deal, but that's just me.
It doesn't bother me, so why are you so worried about it?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:37 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Who threatened Toddy with violence?
No one.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/shrug.gif)
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:38 pm to Toddy
quote:
Are you so naïve to believe that the SCOTUS doesn't monitor public opinion and changing attitudes when ruling?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)