Started By
Message

re: Heavy regulation on semiautomatic* rifles is coming

Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:44 pm to
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17062 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:44 pm to
All we need are bolt-actions and revolvers, imo. Bolt-action is good for hunting and revolvers are good enough for self-defense.

There is a middle ground to be struck here.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43395 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

All we need are bolt-actions and revolvers, imo. Bolt-action is good for hunting and revolvers are good enough for self-defense.



No they're not.

The "middle ground" was struck with the banning of automatic weapons, explosives, etc.

And I'd argue that's way beyond "middle ground."

Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35120 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

All we need are bolt-actions and revolvers, imo. Bolt-action is good for hunting and revolvers are good enough for self-defense.


All we need is a 25hp engine. That's good enough for transportation.

I just saved more lives than you
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57398 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

All we need
The 2A is part of a Bill of RIGHTS not a bill of needs.

quote:

Bolt-action is good for hunting and revolvers are good enough for self-defense.
Not what the 2A is for. Try again.

I also find it ironic that often (not accusing the OP) but gun banners say "no one needs a semiautomatic" also say "you can't defend yourself against the Army".

quote:

There is a middle ground to be struck here.
RIght. Just like when there are two people... one want to f8ck you in the arse, the other want to chop off your d*ck. THe middle ground is they chop off your d*ck and f*ck you with it.


This post was edited on 2/14/18 at 9:51 pm
Posted by Maytheporkbewithyou
Member since Aug 2016
12651 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

All we need


It's not your place to tell the rest of us what we need.

Let's be serious for a minute. Noone is going to come get our guns. There are more guns than their are people in this country. I would not give up my guns. Not ever and I'm not even an extreme gun advocate.

There is no answer to these disgusting acts. Without guns, evil people would still find a way to cause mass casualties if they want to. Pretending that confiscating guns would stop violence is either naive or really dumb.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20453 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

revolvers are good enough for self-defense.
Actually, if you knew what you were talking about you would know that no these are not good enough for self-defense. I am not telling you why do your own damn research or talk out of your arse and display your ignorance.
Posted by Capital Cajun
Over Yonder
Member since Aug 2007
5528 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

All we need are bolt-actions and revolvers, imo. Bolt-action is good for hunting and revolvers are good enough for self-defense. There is a middle ground to be struck here.


Are we going to police the manufacturing of only bolt action rifles and revolvers in all other countries in the world?

We can’t keep people from crossing our boarders, how are we going to keep unwanted guns out?

More food for thought, illicit drug usage and possession is illegal in the US. Has that stopped production, sales, and use of said illicit drugs?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram