- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wray confirms:White House Was Warned of Aide’s Background Months Earlier Than Acknowledged
Posted on 2/13/18 at 11:55 am to tigerinDC09
Posted on 2/13/18 at 11:55 am to tigerinDC09
Same fbi openly conspiring against trump gins up “controversy” to deflect from their implosion - awesome!
This is not going to work
This is not going to work
0
Posted on 2/13/18 at 11:56 am to Geauxst Writer
quote:
Third, security clearance is not a left or right issue, and should concern all Americans that this WH
I bet you were extremely concerned about Hillary's handling of classified info. Amirite?
Posted on 2/13/18 at 11:58 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
The truth about why he was allowed to work there and have access to such sensitive information while under the elevated threat of blackmail
Posted on 2/13/18 at 11:59 am to tigerinDC09
The left is always complaining that the system is rigged against felons, but now they are on a witch hunt to make sure one accused of a crime can't get a job. Interesting. The guy is fired. I think the only fair solution is to hire him back and fire him again. Then and only then will society be even.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 11:59 am to JuiceTerry
This is a weak narrative. That's why people dont care.
You can't blame republicans for creating weak narratives, here. Liberals who've been embroiled in one sex scandal after the other for 20 plus years, are not the right group to push this type of narrative anyway. The idea that him slapping his old lady back in the day made him a national security risk is a huge reach -- a sad attempt to wring the last drop of mileage out of a story that didn't have the pop dems hoped for.
It falls flat for a number of reasons, none of them are the fault of republicans.
You can't blame republicans for creating weak narratives, here. Liberals who've been embroiled in one sex scandal after the other for 20 plus years, are not the right group to push this type of narrative anyway. The idea that him slapping his old lady back in the day made him a national security risk is a huge reach -- a sad attempt to wring the last drop of mileage out of a story that didn't have the pop dems hoped for.
It falls flat for a number of reasons, none of them are the fault of republicans.
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:00 pm to ErikGordan
quote:
The issue is not his spouse but whether he had access to classified information.
Why is this the issue?
I haven't been following this too closely.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:00 pm to ErikGordan
quote:
The issue is not his spouse but whether he had access to classified information
Correct, the fact he couldn’t get a security clearance but was allowed to maintain access to the most highly sensitive information is the point being discussed. Add on that he couldn’t get the clearance because he beats on women is truly despicable.
For an administration who ran on proper security measures (lock her up) to be so negligent themselves is hypocritical. Never mind possibly lying to defend a man who punches on women, which no American man should ever give quarter to.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:02 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:Dude whatabouts this everytime this subject comes up. It's retarded every time.
So wife beating = consensual sex .Good luck with that opinion.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:03 pm to Redleg Guy
He chokes puppies too while sneaking the big red button into the mens room to play with and all while Trump smiles and gives him a thumps up as he is dancing on the original US Constitution that he had uncased so he could walk on it. True story.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:05 pm to JuiceTerry
What's your take on this?
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:09 pm to NIH
quote:I don't know know why you can't beat your wives and not see secret info at the same time
What's your take on this?
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:14 pm to JuiceTerry
Hey, if you can rape a woman and still tote the nuclear football, tuning up a mouthy girlfriend with limited security clearance shouldn't be a big deal, right?
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:16 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Hey, if you can rape a woman and still tote the nuclear football
Ivana has gone back and decided it wasn't rape after all
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:16 pm to Vacherie Saint
If you can't handle proper security protocal as SOS and lose and erase thousands of emails why can't you be POTUS one day.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:19 pm to JuiceTerry
I don't know. Once you haul out that 9 inch orange meatloaf, that thing is getting beat tf up whether she likes it or not. He should have used a Cohiba.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:22 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
White House has some explaining to do on this.
No, they don't.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:27 pm to Dead End
Anthony Scaramucci?Verified account @Scaramucci
Based on FBI testimony, WH Chief of Staff John Kelly almost certainly knew about credible allegations of domestic abuse against Rob Porter at least 6 months ago - then recently forced others to lie about that timeline. Inexcusable. Kelly must resign.
Based on FBI testimony, WH Chief of Staff John Kelly almost certainly knew about credible allegations of domestic abuse against Rob Porter at least 6 months ago - then recently forced others to lie about that timeline. Inexcusable. Kelly must resign.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:29 pm to tigerinDC09
Kushner's push against Kelly has been about as subtle as Bannon's against McMaster. Might backfire on him in the same way.
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:29 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:
This statement by Wray proves Trump, Kelly, and SHS have lied about this issue. Does that not bother you?
No it doesn't. An alleged contradictory statement (if you even consider it contradictory) does not equal proof.
What are your thoughts on The Obama administration spying illegally on the Trump campaign and transition team?
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:31 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
White House has some explaining to do on this.
No they don't.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News