- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Rationale for Chain Migration
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:39 pm
There is a rational argument for chain migration, whether it's a good argument or not is debatable. Chain migration allows entire families to immigrate. People with families work harder, are less likely to commit crime and are generally productive members of society.
So, is their a place in the new immigration, skills-based policy for limited chain migration such as immediate family and minor children?
So, is their a place in the new immigration, skills-based policy for limited chain migration such as immediate family and minor children?
This post was edited on 1/21/18 at 10:40 pm
20
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:40 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
Wrong
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:41 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
Didn’t read OP.
No reason for chain migration.
Chain Migration/Lottery/Anchor Babies all exist for one sole reason: Democrat Votes.
No reason for chain migration.
Chain Migration/Lottery/Anchor Babies all exist for one sole reason: Democrat Votes.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:41 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
They are also less likely to send their money to Mexico or some other Central America country.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:42 pm to jacob4bama
Or back to India, South Africa or Norway.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:44 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
Going to need to see the evidence of this. Evidence that is broken down into high skil and low skill workers.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:44 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
Do not want
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:45 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
Spouse and children should be the cutoff. If you not being able to bring siblings, cousins, aunts, or whatever is a deal breaker then moving to America doesn't really mean that much to you.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:46 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:Its abused and needs to be stopped.
chain migration
Posted on 1/21/18 at 11:55 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
So, is their a place in the new immigration, skills-based policy for limited chain migration such as immediate family and minor children?
I think so.
quote:
limited chain migration such as immediate family and minor children
And that nuclear family should be the full extent of it.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 12:06 am to PurpleandGold Motown
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/3/21 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 12:10 am to PurpleandGold Motown
We have immigration laws. Enforce them. If they are inadequate or outdated, then modify them. Chain migration should be a case-by-case basis only. Each family member should be interviewed, maybe give them a mental illness test.
Figure out a way to vet out the ones that could lose it.
Figure out a way to vet out the ones that could lose it.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:16 am to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
There is a rational argument for chain migration, whether it's a good argument or not is debatable. Chain migration allows entire families to immigrate. People with families work harder, are less likely to commit crime and are generally productive members of society.
The problem with this is that it's only coming up due to the resistance to DACA. It's a solution to a problem that didn't have to be created in the first place.
Along with that, it's being pushed mainly to LBJ the immigrant (primarily Latino-focused) vote.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:31 am to Bard
The problem with chain migration is it is the classic case of taking something that could have been good and stretching it to the point that it fricks it up for everyone else...
I have no issue with a father legally immigrating to this country and being allowed to bring his wife and children with him, if it can be verified that they are indeed his wife and children...
After that, no one should be allowed on the "chain" and anyone providing false information should be deported immediately, along with everyone in their "chain"...
All this bring your aunts, grannies, uncles, cousins, etc, etc is absolute bullshite...
I have no issue with a father legally immigrating to this country and being allowed to bring his wife and children with him, if it can be verified that they are indeed his wife and children...
After that, no one should be allowed on the "chain" and anyone providing false information should be deported immediately, along with everyone in their "chain"...
All this bring your aunts, grannies, uncles, cousins, etc, etc is absolute bullshite...
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:40 am to PurpleandGold Motown
We should end chain migration and birthright citizenship for children of invaders right now - today, this instant if we could do it.
Otherwise, U.S. residency and ultimately citizenship are just ripe for the taking - literally invading rather than going through our proscribed legal channels is far more rewarding under this:
Invasion, anchor baby, chain migration, amnesty - scheme that the Dems have been pushing for over 50 years.
Otherwise, U.S. residency and ultimately citizenship are just ripe for the taking - literally invading rather than going through our proscribed legal channels is far more rewarding under this:
Invasion, anchor baby, chain migration, amnesty - scheme that the Dems have been pushing for over 50 years.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:41 am to PurpleandGold Motown
Increase family reunification by increasing deportation
Posted on 1/22/18 at 9:56 am to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:No there isn't and quit reading right there.....
There is a rational argument for chain migration,
Posted on 1/22/18 at 9:57 am to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
Chain migration allows entire families to immigrate.
I think the same rationale should be used for following other laws. If one member of your family has a drivers license, the whole extended family should be able to drive. If one member has a concealed carry permit, the entire extended family should be good to pack. Makes sense to me. Anything short of that is just bringing back a form of Jim Crow laws, or "separate but equal". The only reason someone could be against that is because of their racism.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 9:58 am to jacob4bama
quote:
They are also less likely to send their money to Mexico or some other Central America country.
Yeah....no.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 9:59 am to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
There is a rational argument for chain migration, whether it's a good argument or not is debatable. Chain migration allows entire families to immigrate. People with families work harder, are less likely to commit crime and are generally productive members of society.
Given that Trump is a product of chair migration kinda blows your premise away.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News