- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Last Jedi is down to 48% Audience score on Rottentomatoes.com
Posted on 12/25/17 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 12/25/17 at 5:29 pm
Are we still using the "bots" excuse?
43 point diff between critics and audience
Seems like the more people who see the movie, the lower the score falls.
Currently the lowest rated of the entire franchise, rivaling the Holiday Special.
43 point diff between critics and audience
Seems like the more people who see the movie, the lower the score falls.
Currently the lowest rated of the entire franchise, rivaling the Holiday Special.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 6:58 am
Posted on 12/25/17 at 5:30 pm to Roaad
Phantom Menace was still worse don't care what anyone says.
Posted on 12/25/17 at 5:31 pm to cattus
quote:59% Audience Score
Phantom Menace
Posted on 12/25/17 at 5:35 pm to Roaad
Please make a new thread for every percentage change. Thanks
Posted on 12/25/17 at 5:35 pm to Roaad
57... 56... 55... 54... 53... 52.
Posted on 12/25/17 at 5:36 pm to jeff5891
quote:Second.
Please make a new thread for every percentage change.
Posted on 12/25/17 at 6:08 pm to Roaad
At what point should discussion about this movie be directed to the Poli board?
Posted on 12/25/17 at 6:12 pm to philly444
quote:
At what point should discussion about this movie be directed to the Poli board?
A fricking week ago.
Posted on 12/25/17 at 6:21 pm to Roaad
40 point difference is unheard of...unheard of.
If this movie didn't wake people up to the shills critics are and their paid or personal or political agenda - then nothing will.
Disney doing work with the MSM press.
The only comparable separation between Critics and Audience scores is Barbershop, the Next Cut:
Critics: 90%
Audience: 67%
If this movie didn't wake people up to the shills critics are and their paid or personal or political agenda - then nothing will.
Disney doing work with the MSM press.
The only comparable separation between Critics and Audience scores is Barbershop, the Next Cut:
Critics: 90%
Audience: 67%
Posted on 12/25/17 at 6:25 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Check out the score for Bright.
Critics: 30%
Audiences: 89%
59 point difference
That is insane.
Critics: 30%
Audiences: 89%
59 point difference
That is insane.
Posted on 12/25/17 at 6:27 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Check out the score for Bright.
Major studios paying to shite on Netflix
Posted on 12/25/17 at 6:31 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Justice League had a forty point difference until about a week ago- in the opposite direction. A few good recent reviews have raised it to a thirty-eight point disparity. Is this the same problem and alarm raising call to arms?
Posted on 12/25/17 at 6:32 pm to Scruffy
Wow...yeah, that's obviously being paid in the opposite.
Posted on 12/26/17 at 9:48 am to Roaad
I saw it over the holiday.
I guess I don't see the SJW or butchering of the lore issues.
Luke's story made sense as presented.
Rey was more a catalyst than a doer.
Ben has just been running scared.
Snoke was legit.
Finn and Rose was a cute B story.
The rebel plan was admittedly eh as it was basically OJs bronco in space. Fuel was never a plot point besides TIE fighters because it didn't need to be one until this one.
Yoda animated as a puppet was a little try hard but still cute.
And I would've preferred the Luke of the books and comics but we're 30 years past the chance to do that and instead of Luke starting a New Jedi Order it's Rey with a clean slate cause of Yoda's wisdom and Luke's action. I'm ok with that.
I guess I don't see the SJW or butchering of the lore issues.
Luke's story made sense as presented.
Rey was more a catalyst than a doer.
Ben has just been running scared.
Snoke was legit.
Finn and Rose was a cute B story.
The rebel plan was admittedly eh as it was basically OJs bronco in space. Fuel was never a plot point besides TIE fighters because it didn't need to be one until this one.
Yoda animated as a puppet was a little try hard but still cute.
And I would've preferred the Luke of the books and comics but we're 30 years past the chance to do that and instead of Luke starting a New Jedi Order it's Rey with a clean slate cause of Yoda's wisdom and Luke's action. I'm ok with that.
This post was edited on 12/26/17 at 9:51 am
Posted on 12/26/17 at 9:49 am to ZappBrannigan
quote:nah
Finn and Rose was a cute B story.
Posted on 12/26/17 at 9:53 am to ZappBrannigan
quote:That doesn’t mean that it wasn’t awful. It also shits all over his past, which was moronic.
Luke's story made sense as presented.
quote:Rey and Ren are only good parts in that movie.
Rey was more a catalyst than a doer.
quote:
Snoke was legit.
Are you trolling?
quote:Yea, you’re trolling.
Finn and Rose was a cute B story.
This post was edited on 12/26/17 at 9:55 am
Posted on 12/26/17 at 9:58 am to StrongBackWeakMind
What was wrong with it?
They had an adventure of misadventures. That's pretty much star wars. It was succinct and had some fun laughs. I woulda liked some more play from Benecio, his shuttle being the one they escaped on could have been killer.
They had an adventure of misadventures. That's pretty much star wars. It was succinct and had some fun laughs. I woulda liked some more play from Benecio, his shuttle being the one they escaped on could have been killer.
Posted on 12/26/17 at 10:00 am to ZappBrannigan
quote:
It was succinct
quote:
and had some fun laughs
sorry you're not fake news. you're just retarded
Posted on 12/26/17 at 10:00 am to Breesus
quote:
Major studios paying to shite on Netflix
I don't think this is much of a surprise. Rotten Tomatoes has become the source for movie/TV show reviews. I don't think since Siskel and Ebert hit national publications have we had a single source like RT for influencing film perceptions and opinions.
So of course these multi-billion dollar organizations would pay to control the numbers on RT. And of course journalists making ~$40k-$60k/year would accept a bribe if presented.
Popular
Back to top


19








