- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:12 pm to AUbused
Dale is legit dumb enough to be the greatest troll on the planet. Even that name is dumb. Dale.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:12 pm to GumboPot
Hitler and all the real Nazis are about to fly out and wreck some shite.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:14 pm to bonhoeffer45
Scientists have already admitted the estimated warming ability of CO2 was grossly over estimated. Let it go. We need higher levels to insure longevity of modern plant life.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:16 pm to notsince98
No. They haven’t. And you can’t find a credible source for that statement, because the vast majority understand this 101 shite
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:19 pm to olddawg26
Lol.. The vast majority see the models have been completely inaccurate and they have now admitted why.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:20 pm to olddawg26
quote:
The huddle and play has already been called. The ship has sailed,
You're projecting again, olddawg..
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:22 pm to AUbused
quote:
Dale is a braindead hack who I generally ignore. However I see this argument too many times and so chose his post to respond to the argument in general .
Oh, yooou! self identify yourself any way you like.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:23 pm to notsince98
Show us a link. And also show why the temperature is continuing to rise every year. And why everything points to co2 levels helping contribute to that. And why the hockey stick hoax was debunked.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:24 pm to Dale51
Dale
“That only exists in your mind!!111”
“That only exists in your mind!!111”
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:24 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Dale is legit dumb enough to be the greatest troll on the planet. Even that name is dumb. Dale.
Quality melt daaaawg
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:25 pm to bonhoeffer45
Thank you.
I will read this and consider it when I have time.
I do appreciate the effort.
I will read this and consider it when I have time.
I do appreciate the effort.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:29 pm to notsince98
quote:
Scientists have already admitted the estimated warming ability of CO2 was grossly over estimated. Let it go.
In another few years, after the hoax has been clearly exposed, these true believers will be little different than the "Screaming at The Sky" crowd.
Sad....but funny!
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:32 pm to olddawg26
Well...I have to admit it...that is one of the most intellectual responses you've made! Pour yourself a toast!
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:35 pm to GumboPot
The sky is fallin the sky is fallin. Woe is me, we're all doomed.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:36 pm to GeorgePaton
You talking bout this board for 8 years?
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:50 pm to Dale51
quote:Interesting question.
Thats nice.
CO2 makes up what percentage of greenhouse gasses?
There are two ways to answer: (1) Concentration, and (2) Contribution
Both depend on whether water vapor (far and away the most significant GreenHouse Agent) is even considered. The amount of water vapor in Earth's atmosphere varies substantially by region, season, and weather conditions. So it is often erroneously not included in "calculations" at all.
In terms of GHGs, typically our troposphere contains:
1 to 4% water vapor or 10,000-40,000ppm.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 400ppm
Methane (CH4) 1.7ppm
Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 0.3ppm
CFC's (and other misc. gases) 0.028ppm
GHG Contribution - Adjusted for Heat Retention Characteristics:
Water vapor = 95.000%
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) = 3.618%
Nitrous oxide (N2O) = 0.950%
Methane (CH4) = 0.360%
CFC's (and other misc. gases) = 0.072%
Of the 3.618% CO2 contribution = 28% is deemed anthropogenic. IOW 28% of 3.618 or 1.01% of total "greenhouse effect" is thought d/t human activity)
However, even that number can be misleading d/t to failure in considering other buffering effects such as cloud formation.
This post was edited on 11/20/17 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:55 pm to NC_Tigah
Good post.
Now the next question ( don't know if it's worth asking, as the "true believers" seem to have run away)...is "What percent of greenhouse gases make up the atmosphere?"
* for context, we're already at "man-made" CO2 being a small part of 3.6%*
Now the next question ( don't know if it's worth asking, as the "true believers" seem to have run away)...is "What percent of greenhouse gases make up the atmosphere?"
* for context, we're already at "man-made" CO2 being a small part of 3.6%*
Posted on 11/20/17 at 7:10 pm to Dale51
quote:Actually "3.6%" is CO2 GH contribution, not CO2 concentration.
* for context, we're already at "man-made" CO2 being a small part of 3.6%*
So the "man-made" portion in terms of concentration is 0.0112%, not 3.6%.
Nitrogen (N2) 78%
Oxygen (O2) 21%
Argon (Ar) almost 1%
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 0.04%
Everything else combined (neon, helium, methane, krypton, hydrogen,...) > 0.0028%
This post was edited on 11/20/17 at 7:13 pm
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News