- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gun control lobby going after muzzleloaders now?
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:23 pm
I thought they said muzzleloaders were the ONLY weapon protected by the 2nd amendment. Get your shite together Dems.
Apparently someone is working on a suppressor for a muzzleloader and that means that gangs will start roaming the streets looking like 1776 around here.
I did find it funny that he mentions that if the D.C. sniper had a silenced muzzleloader there would be no telling what kind of carnage they would have caused. I just get a mental picture of the kid in the trunk, trying to reload a fricking MUZZLELOADER.
Tucker
Apparently someone is working on a suppressor for a muzzleloader and that means that gangs will start roaming the streets looking like 1776 around here.
I did find it funny that he mentions that if the D.C. sniper had a silenced muzzleloader there would be no telling what kind of carnage they would have caused. I just get a mental picture of the kid in the trunk, trying to reload a fricking MUZZLELOADER.
Tucker
13
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:36 pm to Rougarou13
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:42 pm to Rougarou13
SilencerCo came out with a regulator for a muzzleloader. It's not called a silencer because a muzzleloader is not considered firearm by the ATF.
Someone did an accuracy video a few weeks ago with it on YouTube and it was pretty poor.
Just
at the DC sniper statement
Someone did an accuracy video a few weeks ago with it on YouTube and it was pretty poor.
Just
at the DC sniper statement 
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:43 pm to Rougarou13
these people have reached a new level of retardation
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:48 pm to Rougarou13
As someone who is really into traditional weapons (sidelock muzzleloaders & longbows), this really sucks.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:52 pm to Rougarou13
Supressors are bad enough to clean with modern propellants. Black powder crud? Nah.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:56 pm to Rougarou13
Someone called a local radio talk show about this. I thought they were drunk and had it all screwed up. Especially after the said about the silencer.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:09 am to Rougarou13
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms or form private armies.
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
just an example of the plutocracy at work.. large campaign donations do wonders to shift policy in a corporations favor
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
just an example of the plutocracy at work.. large campaign donations do wonders to shift policy in a corporations favor
This post was edited on 11/18/17 at 12:16 am
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:16 am to Rougarou13
quote:
Apparently someone is working on a suppressor for a muzzleloader and that means that gangs will start roaming the streets looking like 1776 around here.
Preorder is avalable now but very expensive, innacurate, and a bitch to maintain (clean). LINK
Black powder revolvers have always been cheap and avaliable online without any sort of background check, wonder why they never caught on with the crips?
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:21 am to Rougarou13
They think silencers are the danger, Mel Gibson and his sons didn't need silencers against the Red Coats. LINK
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:46 pm to Rougarou13
quote:
I thought they said muzzleloaders were the ONLY weapon protected by the 2nd amendment. Get your shite together Dems.
Apparently someone is working on a suppressor for a muzzleloader and that means that gangs will start roaming the streets looking like 1776 around here.
I did find it funny that he mentions that if the D.C. sniper had a silenced muzzleloader there would be no telling what kind of carnage they would have caused. I just get a mental picture of the kid in the trunk, trying to reload a fricking MUZZLELOADER.
silencer for a muzzle-loader??
Just shows how IGNORANT the prog/DEM/MSM fillth really is.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:52 pm to Rougarou13
Nothing to back the assertion up, just that lying pos partisan hack Tucker Carlson "saying" it. Pathetic.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 3:20 pm to Rougarou13
The guy is worried about larger shells put in a muzzle loader. Well, he's got a point. Here is a muzzle loader that shoots a really large ball. It can do a lot of damage. I'm not sure if it's legal:
But I wouldn't advise using it for shooting up a school. It's hard to conceal when you walk onto campus.
But I wouldn't advise using it for shooting up a school. It's hard to conceal when you walk onto campus.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 7:38 pm to Rougarou13
Pretty soon we will be reduced to defending our neighborhoods with the pike and arquebuse.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News