- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:51 pm to Amazing Moves
MAGA
By allowing rich people to continue to control everything and make decisions based on their own financial welfare instead of what's best for the country.
But he's gonna drain the swamp of DC!!!
By allowing rich people to continue to control everything and make decisions based on their own financial welfare instead of what's best for the country.
But he's gonna drain the swamp of DC!!!
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:52 pm to TH03
Yep
They are arguing against an issue they don't even understand
Same with cyrpto.
They are arguing against an issue they don't even understand
Same with cyrpto.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:52 pm to Halftrack
How many boards did you post this on?
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:53 pm to rocket31
"I don't understand it so it's bullshite"
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:54 pm to TH03
"liberals voted against this, so I'm for it!"
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:59 pm to rocket31
fricking pisses me off. None of these old tards even realize like 90% of the comments sent to the FCC in support of the repeal were sent by bots. Nearly all organic comments were in favor of net neutrality.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 1:31 pm to rocket31
This is a very serious issue, and I dont think its being treated as such. This has been made into a d vs r issue and it shouldn't be at all.
Free websites will go out of business or you will have to start paying for it.
And not even websites, it's about online services you use as well. Those prices will go up as well.
Free websites will go out of business or you will have to start paying for it.
And not even websites, it's about online services you use as well. Those prices will go up as well.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 1:48 pm to PhillipJFry
quote:
This is a very serious issue, and I dont think its being treated as such. This has been made into a d vs r issue and it shouldn't be at all.
indeed.
they are attempting to make it a partisan issue when this affects everyone regardless if youre D or R
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 11/17/17 at 3:25 pm to LordSaintly
quote:However, I also think it will provide more incentive for innovation in internet access much like the deregulation of Ma Bell did years ago.
it won't make much difference to us either way
The same, or very similar, hysterical cries from the unknowing masses were heard across the land when that happened.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 3:32 pm to rocket31
quote:
they are attempting to make it a bipartisan issue when this affects everyone regardless if youre D or R
I assume you mean partisan.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 3:41 pm to Obtuse1
quote:Rocket never knows what he means. He's just THAT stupid.
I assume you mean partisan.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 3:44 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
Telling cable companies how to run their business is communism.
The internet is different. It’s about protecting the flow of information.
The memes must flow.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 4:04 pm to Chuker
quote:
internet needs to be treated as a utility. Imo, if you have the ability to use imminent domain for a right-of-way then you aren't 100% in the private sector and you should be subject to oversight by the public.
So instead of being able to pay for faster internet we will just pay more taxes for shite internet, in all likelyhood
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 11/17/17 at 4:12 pm to Dizz
quote:
How many internet providers do counties like England and Germany have? It was always my understanding that without the monopolies Europeans had more choices, better service, and cheaper internet service.
In England each ISP gets to decide if it wants to operate in a certain area, not some local monopoly keeping them out. Data caps are not a thing there.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 4:30 pm to rocket31
quote:
they are attempting to make it a bipartisan issue when this affects everyone regardless if youre D or R
Yeah, and I’m keeping tabs once this website on which idiots to blame for this. So far I’ve got DarthRebel, ShortyRob, LSURussian, and Taxing Authority. Plus I will also be voting for the opponents of my a-hole Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn as well as the members of the house when they come up for reelection. They sold the country to Comcast.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 4:32 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
I assume you mean partisan.
yaaaa shiit
ill edit
Posted on 11/17/17 at 4:34 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
So far I’ve got DarthRebel, ShortyRob, LSURussian, and Taxing Authority
ol Russian just said on the poli board that there are 9 different ISPs in BR to choose from
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 11/17/17 at 4:38 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
OMLandshark
You realize Youtube is owned / controlled by Google right?
Oh, and putting John Oliver out there as a credible source to explain anything destroys your credibility. There's nothing about John Oliver that isn't heavily biased and nothing he does that is free of an agenda.
I feel compelled to side with whatever argument is opposite of yours, because of this. Congrats.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)