- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Dims Didn't Wait Long - Feinstein to Introuce Bill to Ban Bump Stocks
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:12 am to Snipe
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:12 am to Snipe
quote:
Another flashy, scary word that brain dead liberal vote bots can latch onto that is almost meaningless and not even a part of the problem.
How can even the most brainless poster here say something like this less than a week from a shooting where a bump stock was used to kill and injure so many people?
2
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:12 am to Clyde Tipton
quote:
The defense is that the laws regulating actual full auto weapons are pointless
Are they though? To my knowledge the use of fully auto weapons in gun crime is pretty rare. Surely that has something to do with their cost and availability.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:12 am to AUbused
Because bump stocks will cease to exist upon being banned. Cool. Yet another example of taking things from law abiding citizens so criminals will be the only ones that have them.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:14 am to Knight of Old
quote:
Thank God, because no bump stocks will mean no one will be murdered to death by guns ever again.
The Far Left is beyond idiotic. JMO...
Idiotic is thinking that a law has no merit unless it attains some unrealistic result.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:17 am to AUbused
quote:
Are they though?
Yes. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
quote:
To my knowledge the use of fully auto weapons in gun crime is pretty rare.
Any gun crime is rare when you look at the overwhelming number of guns in this country.
quote:
Surely that has something to do with their cost and availability.
Making something too expensive for 99% of the population to curb a .09% chance of it being used in a crime does not make good common sense. You are curtailing the rights of the majority because of the actions of an extreme minority.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:18 am to MrLarson
Taking bump stocks from law abiding bump stock owners makes them unable to protect themselves from criminals with bump stocks
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:20 am to el Gaucho
They came for bump stocks but I didn’t care because I didn’t have a bump stock...
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:22 am to Haughton99
quote:
Idiotic is thinking that a law has no merit unless it attains some unrealistic result.
There are so many different factors that contributed to this event that creating legislation for one specific item is just asinine.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:23 am to Haughton99
quote:
How can even the most brainless poster here say something like this less than a week from a shooting where a bump stock was used to kill and injure so many people?
Because a "Bump Stock" is not what killed all those people.
How come your not wetting your panties over the high vantage point that the shooter had to make killing 59 people and wounding 500 more so easy? SELECTIVE OUTRAGE that why...
GFY
I'm one of the few people in this pussy country that looks at this and thinks of course shite like this is going to happen because we live in a pussy country where we can't institutionalize the crazy people because that might hurt their feelings. This shooting is not even close to being surprising to me because I know that the more you turds sensationalize this crap the more you emboldening the other useless turds who are home wanting their 15 minutes of fame.
Most of you peoples outrage is a straight up joke because smart people can see your agenda.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:23 am to MrLarson
quote:Good.
Feinstein introducing bill to ban the sale, of bump stocks, trigger cranks that accelerate a semi-automatic rifle’s rate of fire
Approval of those measures should be unanimous.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:25 am to Clyde Tipton
Three chances and you completely avoided my point.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:27 am to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Because bump stocks will cease to exist upon being banned.
I specifically said it would decrease their availability
Do any of you people have the ability to argue without getting so emotional? I'd swear you were libs.
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 10:30 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:32 am to AUbused
quote:
I specifically said it would decrease their availability
Yes, and this is stupid, incorrect, dimwitted.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:32 am to MrLarson
never heard of a bum stock?
what does it do turn your gun into a shake weight so trigger can be pulled quicker?
what does it do turn your gun into a shake weight so trigger can be pulled quicker?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:37 am to MikeBRLA
quote:
One thing these idiots don't seem to comprehend is that criminals, by definition, don't follow laws.
I was about to reply with these words. This should end the discussion.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:44 am to LSU Patrick
So let me get this straight. Fully auto weapons are heavily restricted and illegal without appropriate, hard to attain licensing, but that has nothing to do with the fact that they are rarely ever used in violent crime.
Got it!
Got it!
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:46 am to MrLarson
so legislation to address a situation for which she along with the rest of the public knows very little
seems about right.
seems about right.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:46 am to AUbused
quote:
Three chances and you completely avoided my point.
I think I took time to address every word of your post?
If I were to pull some "point" out of your post. I guess you were trying to say, laws made them harder to get and as a result they aren't used very often.
To counter that "point", and again, I'm drawing conclusions about your post instead of addressing your actual words now, I'd say, over regulation burdening the law abiding majority to prevent the minority from doing something illegal does not make sense. You are preventing people from enjoying their freedom, all the while the bad actors will still find a way no matter how many new laws or regulations are passed.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:47 am to Clyde Tipton
quote:
The defense is that the laws regulating actual full auto weapons are pointless. Without those bull shite laws, you don't have people figuring out ways around them. If you ban bump fire stocks, someone will figure out a way around those.
Or... We could have freedom and liberty.
so you're in favor of allowing fully automatic weapons to be available for purchase at walmart? your freedom and liberty is currently being infringed because you aren't able to buy said fully automatic weapons at walmart at the present time? are you insane?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:50 am to Clyde Tipton
quote:
To counter that "point", and again, I'm drawing conclusions about your post instead of addressing your actual words now, I'd say, over regulation burdening the law abiding majority to prevent the minority from doing something illegal does not make sense. You are preventing people from enjoying their freedom, all the while the bad actors will still find a way no matter how many new laws or regulations are passed.
My point was that something being highly available vs highly restricted makes it more likely to be used. That is a different argument than whether something should be illegal based on constitutional rights.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News