Started By
Message

re: Why do liberals want to ban guns in America?

Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:16 pm to
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140977 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

No-one needs 10 guns as an individual.


I do. Frick off.

ETA: Just checked all my guns except for the antique rifle...they are still behaving and not running around killing anyone.

Same as yesterday.
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 8:19 pm
Posted by acrossenemylinesmofo
Member since Sep 2016
91 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:21 pm to
Honest opinion from a moderate who owns guns. Yes there are some extreme Berkeley types who want to outright ban guns. Most have probably grown up in an urban environment where they think there isn't as much of a need or demand.

The vast majority of Americans do not subscribe to this belief, but I think most support limited regulation. You get into slippery slope argument saying background checks lead to gun bans. I own 12 guns and support the second amendment but I am not totally against background checks with mandatory gun safety for new gun owners.

This guy would have been able to purchase guns legally and pass all checks so much of this will done very little for this situation. I do think being dismissive to those who are nervous about guns creates an environment where sensibility ends on both sides. The NRA has done a great job pissing off sensible people by becoming ultra political. I stop being a supporter about 6 years ago when it was obvious they are just stoking fear to sell guns.

Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12812 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

A country where the people don't have any means to fight back against their future totalitarian government is their goal.



I am an avid shooter and gun owner but get real.

people like to hunt, shoot and protect their homes from intruders. nobody is part of a militia that is preparing to fight off the American government one day.
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Rougarou13


And you are the winner winner, chicken dinner.
Posted by Amazing Moves
Member since Jan 2014
6049 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:26 pm to
Because they are the most short sighted group in America.
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:27 pm to
The entire purpose of the 2nd Amendment, and the fact it's SECOND right after free speech, is because an armed population is necessary for a free state.

Also the shooter in Vegas was rich and passed all the background checks and got his guns legally.

Bigger question should be WHY not HOW.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:32 pm to
so we can be Venezuela

There is nothing done there that they do not want to do here.

They think they will do it better.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29440 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:34 pm to
Because wolves don’t lose sleep over the opinions of sheep.
Posted by Rougarou13
Brookhaven MS
Member since Feb 2015
6839 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

No-one needs 10 guns as an individual. Maybe one pistol for home protection and one rifle for hunting.


I have more guns than I have outfits in my closet...and they all serve a distinct purpose. Most are hunting rifles, but different calibers are better suited for different situations. As far as cop killer bullets are concerned, that’s a ridiculous misnomer that some liberal made up. There are certainly types of ammunition that are geared toward penetration, but most any high powered rifle will penetrate a non mil spec vest.

You don’t have to own 10 guns or whatever if you don’t want to, but don’t ever tell me that I can’t.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30056 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:37 pm to
As Janet Jackson succinctly sang, "control-l-l".
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76634 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

No-one needs 10 guns as an individual.
You don't need a 6 figure salary

Or opiod pain killers

or a car that goes faster than 70

or more than 4 oz of meat

or or or

frick you
Posted by Rougarou13
Brookhaven MS
Member since Feb 2015
6839 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

the weapons that the government has access to, far surpasses any technology the common man can have.


You should tell that to the Vietnamese and the Afghanis. They’d love to hear all about that.
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18533 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

No-one needs 10 guns as an individual


Who are you, and what makes you qualified to tell me how much of anything I can buy?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140977 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

cop killer bullets


Using your own feeble knowledge and not googling some dem talking point website...

define cop killer bullets.

This should be great.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29440 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:41 pm to
The liberal argument is pure insanity.

“Ban guns to prevent violence. If it saves one life.... But killing babies because I’m an irresponsible shite? No problem. Look how brave you are.”
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12812 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

You should tell that to the Vietnamese and the Afghanis. They’d love to hear all about that.



are you seriously comparing the American government and military to that of Vietnam and Afghanistan?
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18533 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

people like to hunt, shoot and protect their homes from intruders. nobody is part of a militia that is preparing to fight off the American government one day.



That's not entirely true. Though very small in numbers, groups exist with that very philosophy.

I don't think guns should be banned simply because the rights of the majority should not be lessened because of the actions of a few lunatics. You can't regulate lunacy. However, for me to say that the arrival of a hostile government is not possible is just false. Not so much here, because we love liberty, but it has happened in history before. I would prefer to have the ability to defend my home and family if necessary.
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18533 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

are you seriously comparing the American government and military to that of Vietnam and Afghanistan?



While militarily we beat them decisively, the Vietnamese managed to kill 58,000 of us. I'm not sure how many the war in Afghanistan cost us, but it wasn't a low number.

ETA: My point is, you don't have to win militarily to defeat a major power. You just have to make it bloodier than what it's worth.....which is exactly what happened in Vietnam.
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 8:48 pm
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

When you say liberals do you mean the 75 percent of NRA members who favor reasonable, common sense gun controls like background checks?

that's bs and anyone with half a brain knows it.

shall not be infringed

gun control EQUALS infringed
Posted by Rougarou13
Brookhaven MS
Member since Feb 2015
6839 posts
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

are you seriously comparing the American government and military to that of Vietnam and Afghanistan?


I think this convo went a bit over your head.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram