Started By
Message

re: MA elementary school librarian rejects books sent by FLOTUS - 'Dr. Seuss is a cliche'

Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:47 pm to
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99617 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:47 pm to
It's a witch!!! Burn it!!!
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36392 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:50 pm to
She's got a Viola Swamp vibe.




Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35770 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

"You may not be aware of this, but Dr. Seuss is a bit of a cliché, a tired and worn ambassador for children's literature


Uh...aren't ALL children's books tired and worn amassadors?

We've had the same books for 50 years. Why? Because they won awards and are called classics.

“The more that you read, the more things you will know. The more that you learn, the more places you’ll go.”

Should adults not read Homer because he's so cliche now?

I guess instead of Dr. Seuss the librarian wants more:

Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35770 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

"You may not be aware of this, but Dr. Seuss is a bit of a cliché, a tired and worn ambassador for children's literature


Uh...aren't ALL children's books tired and worn amassadors?

We've had the same books for 50 years. Why? Because they won awards and are called classics.

“The more that you read, the more things you will know. The more that you learn, the more places you’ll go.”

Should adults not read Homer because he's so cliche now?

I guess instead of Dr. Seuss the librarian wants more:

Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

MA elementary school librarian rejects books sent by FLOTUS - 'Dr. Seuss is a cliche'
I don't know why an elementary wouldn't accept any book that his developmentally appropriate, or even if not they could still accept it and donate it to someone else, some of the most well known children's books.

Regardless, if they are going to reject them, why make such a unnecessarily justification? Why not just suggest that it should be donated to schools with less resources, where any book would be a great benefit?

What is more disturbing though is that the librarian should KNOW that Dr Seuss books have text that targets a number of reading skills that are essential to reading and literacy development. So pretentiousness is irrelevant in compassion.

And finally, given that so many children lack the intrinsic motivation to read, or worse, have reading problems and are often too frustrated to read which exacerbates it, it's inexcusable to use "cliché" of the books as an excuse to withhold them from the students who just may find them interesting and/or help their reading skills.
This post was edited on 9/28/17 at 2:08 pm
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
83015 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:56 pm to
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141382 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:57 pm to
Why do they all look the same?
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18877 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

From her own blog:



That is brilliant. Upvote sir!
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
83015 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 1:59 pm to
That letter encapsulated everything I hate about liberals - this bitch is unbearable
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18877 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 2:01 pm to
If the FLOTUS had sent her some copies of I Am Jazz (the transgender kid book), she'd be in one hell of a conundrum.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 2:01 pm to
And this quote is quite ironic given the pretentiousness excuse:
quote:

"My students have access to a school library with over nine thousand volumes and a librarian with a graduate degree in library science. Multiple studies show that schools with professionally staffed libraries improve student performance," wrote Phipps Soeiro.
Well I guess since you have a graduate degree somehow your ignorance, counter to the graduate degree itself, is somehow inexcusable.

I know a person who has a graduate degree in library science, and works in an inner city school. She's frequently talks about how she's looking for resources to access more books to get students interested, and she asks the students what interests them to find books that they may be more likely to read.

I'm going to show her this next time I see her. I bet she will be appalled by someone with the same career and similar educational background, make such a statement. And I bet it's frustrating that this person makes the field look bad.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile, school libraries around the country are being shuttered. Cities like Philadelphia, Chicago, and Detroit are suffering through expansion, privatization, and school “choice” with no interest in outcomes of children, their families, their teachers, and their schools. Are those kids any less deserving of books simply because of circumstances beyond their control? Why not go out of your way to gift books to underfunded and underprivileged communities that continue to be marginalized and maligned by policies put in place by Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos? Why not reflect on those “high standards of excellence” beyond only what the numbers suggest? Secretary DeVos would do well to scaffold and lift schools instead of punishing them with closures and slashed budgets.
I do agree with his generaltpoint that it makes more sense to give books to schools who are struggling rather than a school who is doing well.

But why make it so condescending? Why not just say "these schools need it more and it would be good to focus on those with needs instead."
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78754 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

'The librarian's editorial also criticizes the first lady's book selections, which include "The Cat in the Hat," "One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue Fish," "The Foot Book," "Green Eggs and Ham" and "Oh, the Places You'll Go!"

"You may not be aware of this, but Dr. Seuss is a bit of a cliché, a tired and worn ambassador for children's literature. As First Lady of the United States, you have an incredible platform with world-class resources at your fingertips," she wrote.'


what in the actual frick?!?

i really dont want to live on the same planet as these idiots
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78754 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:


librarian sounds like a cun't. yeah I said it.


you can also say it without the ' if you're in chicken's premium TD member club

cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
cunt
This post was edited on 9/28/17 at 2:09 pm
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29324 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

But why make it so condescending? Why not just say "these schools need it more and it would be good to focus on those with needs instead."


Because she's all-in on "resisting" and wants attention.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Because she's all-in on "resisting" and wants attention.
Obviously. This is maybe the most disgusting display of virtue signaling I've seen given the context and her "expertise."

And I found this to be quite interesting:

quote:

Another fact that many people are unaware of is that Dr. Seuss’s illustrations are steeped in racist propaganda,
I texted this to someone who works in an inner city elementary school, that's like 95% black and asked him to see if they carry Dr Seuss books.

Apparently he didn't even end up asking the librarian because there was a Dr Seuss book sitting right on her desk.

So maybe the books are steeped in racist propaganda, but I read to my son at night, and have read a number of Dr Seuss books. While I may not be as intelligent and enlightened as her, I am therefore probably closer to the children who read these books. And if I never noticed this propaganda, I'm guessing the children don't either.

Besides, everyone at that school, teachers, librarians, administrators, etc., must not be as enlightened as her. Otherwise why would they knowingly allow their students to read racist propaganda, and presumably propaganda that implies their own race is inferior?

So either it's not very effective propaganda, or it's just a subjective interpretation that confirmed a preconceived bias with no practical basis in the objective reality.
This post was edited on 9/28/17 at 2:26 pm
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
91191 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 2:30 pm to
Now send them copies of this


Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99713 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 4:26 pm to
I bet she would have glowingly praised Michelle if she had made that donation.

These frickers are so transparent
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
51090 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

"Why not go out of your way to gift books to underfunded and underprivileged communities that continue to be marginalized and maligned by policies put in place by Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos?" she wrote.


Betsy DeVos has been education secretary for all of 2 months of an actual school year. Which policies, exactly, are we talking about here, Miss Librarian?
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12049 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 4:44 pm to
You're asking for specifics and facts. You're asking too much of this SJW librarian! They don't mess with facts.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram