- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DAT 8/2: Rays (Pruitt) @ Astros (Keuchel), 7:10 CDT
Posted on 8/2/17 at 2:38 pm to Floating Change Up
Posted on 8/2/17 at 2:38 pm to Floating Change Up
Posted on 8/2/17 at 2:50 pm to davy jones
Are those three names in the correct order?
This post was edited on 8/2/17 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 8/2/17 at 2:54 pm to High C
That's what his Wikipedia page indicates. Unsurprisingly he goes by Rico.
This post was edited on 8/2/17 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 8/2/17 at 2:56 pm to davy jones
quote:
Jablonski Rico Noel
#championship
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:03 pm to Jwho77
Having a Jabroni and a Jablonski on the same team makes us unstoppable imo
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:07 pm to Jwho77
Mctags retweeted that Verlander placed on revocable waivers today.
Is that what we want??
Is that what we want??
This post was edited on 8/2/17 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:12 pm to High C
Nearly every player in baseball will be placed on waivers. It's part of the game.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:12 pm to Jwho77
Yes, there are always exceptions created.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:14 pm to High C
Tampa's starter tonight Pruitt is a guy from this area that some of my buddies played against. I only say that because I specifically remember him coming into the game out of the bullpen in our series in Tampa and he had like a 9.00 era or some shite. He then proceeded to shut us down for multiple innings
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:15 pm to Pnels08
quote:
Mctags retweeted that Verlander placed on revocable waivers today. Is that what we want??
Verlander Cueto Samardjiza those are the names to watch for coming out of waivers
Verlander being the goal
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:16 pm to Pnels08
quote:
Is that what we want??
Yes. That process clears the way for him to be traded.
LINK
That link offers a rundown on the waiver process. I don't see a deal happening. I'd imagine if we wanted Verlander, it would have been a lot easier to get a deal done at the non waiver deadline.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:21 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Exactly. And cueto is injured.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:31 pm to Tiger Ryno
Samardzija has no trade protection and indicated before the deadline that he wouldn't approve a deal.
Key details:
A player is on waivers for 47 hours. After which if a team hasn't claimed him, hes cleared waivers and his team can discuss trades with anyone. The 2 day rule also applies to working out a trade. If a deal isn't done in 2 days, the waiver claim is revoked and the player stays with his club.
A player can only be placed on revocable waivers once. If he's placed on waivers a 2nd time, it's non revocable and any team that claims him is awarded the player and they must agree to a trade or assume his contract.
Key details:
A player is on waivers for 47 hours. After which if a team hasn't claimed him, hes cleared waivers and his team can discuss trades with anyone. The 2 day rule also applies to working out a trade. If a deal isn't done in 2 days, the waiver claim is revoked and the player stays with his club.
A player can only be placed on revocable waivers once. If he's placed on waivers a 2nd time, it's non revocable and any team that claims him is awarded the player and they must agree to a trade or assume his contract.
This post was edited on 8/2/17 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:33 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Is there a rule that a player must be unclaimed on waivers before teams can discuss a possible trade? Or could we agree to a trade and then the Tigers put him on waivers and if he gets through the trade happens quick.
I guess with Verlander that ship has sailed
I guess with Verlander that ship has sailed
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:33 pm to Pnels08
quote:yes. it starts the process of a potential trade, however, given how you are guys are pretty far down on the priority list, i can see someone just claiming him to block a potential trade to the astros
Mctags retweeted that Verlander placed on revocable waivers today.
but maybe that doesnt happen and he falls to you guys where you will probably claim him and see if you can make a trade work
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:35 pm to dhav14
i think technically, by the actual wording of the rule, you would need to wait until you claim him before you begin trade negotiations. but in actuality teams probably have an open discussion throughout the whole year about deals and, especially at the deadline, they will talk about waiver moves
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:36 pm to WestCoastAg
I am pretty sure Braun went unclaimed last year but the Brewers didn't work a deal with anyone.
With the high salary guys you never know. The only two teams that have the resources to claim him and risk getting stuck with his money and would be motivated to do so are Boston and New York. New York seems most likely to do it since he could actually have an impact for them if they were to work out their own deal
With the high salary guys you never know. The only two teams that have the resources to claim him and risk getting stuck with his money and would be motivated to do so are Boston and New York. New York seems most likely to do it since he could actually have an impact for them if they were to work out their own deal
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News