- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Harvard study: 98% of MSM coverage of Trump negative
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:01 am
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:01 am
LINK
Worse than North Korea
quote:
Academics at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzed coverage from Trump’s first 100 days in office across 10 major TV and print outlets.
It found that the tone of some outlets was negative in as many as 98% of reports, significantly more hostile than the first 100 days of the three previous administrations:
quote:
In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal.
They also took into account the BBC, the UK’s Financial Times and the German public broadcaster ARD.
Every outlet was negative more often than positive.
quote:
The picture was very different for other recent administrations. The study found that President Obama’s first 100 got positive good overall – with 59% of reports positive.
Worse than North Korea
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:02 am to bamarep
Maybe becausez 98% of what he does in negative.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:03 am to bamarep
Trump has had a horrible time in office so far, including a personal press briefing where he just lashed out at the press.
Not sure how you spin an fbi investigation in a positive way.
Not sure how you spin an fbi investigation in a positive way.
This post was edited on 5/19/17 at 8:05 am
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:03 am to bamarep
Rules for Radicals. Media is controlled by leftist radicals.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:05 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Not sure how you spin an fbi investigation in a positive way
The fact he's not a subject?
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:07 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Not sure how you spin an fbi investigation in a positive way.
Especially when it is all a lie.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:10 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Not sure how you spin an fbi investigation in a positive way.
How many people have to go on record in saying Trump did nothing wrong?
And this is Obama people saying this.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:11 am to bamarep
some pretty interesting notes in that study
like this for example
this just illustrates that the media doesn't have to spin things, Trump does this to himself
also with as much as this board bitches about the "muh Russians", it only receiving 6% of the news coverage is surprising
like this for example
this just illustrates that the media doesn't have to spin things, Trump does this to himself
also with as much as this board bitches about the "muh Russians", it only receiving 6% of the news coverage is surprising
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:11 am to bamarep
You reap what you sow.
Actions and tweets have consequences.
Actions and tweets have consequences.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:13 am to Salmon
Thanks for posting the graphs Salmon.
I couldn't figure out how to do that from my phone.
I couldn't figure out how to do that from my phone.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:13 am to Salmon
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:19 am to bamarep
quote:Appointing Flynn to NSA wasn't wrong? Having the likes of Manafort, Page, etc around wasn't wrong? Not having a consistent story on firing Comey isn't wrong? Getting caught in lies trying to deny contacts with Russians isn't wrong?
How many people have to go on record in saying Trump did nothing wrong?
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:22 am to bamarep
There's no question the media has been after Trump from the jump. I actually really bothers me that he was never going to be given a chance.
That being said, Trump also brought at least 25% of that coverage on himself by acting like a damn goon.
That being said, Trump also brought at least 25% of that coverage on himself by acting like a damn goon.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:36 am to Eurocat
quote:
Maybe becausez 98% of what he does in negative.
I suppose one could argue that point, but what I'm looking at is the concerted effort of the MSM/Dims to bring this POTUS down, it's pretty damn pitiful and impressive at the same time.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:38 am to Eurocat
quote:
Maybe becausez 98% of what he does in negative
/thread
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:40 am to Bass Tiger
Is reporting the stupid things Trump does "trying to bring him down"? When MSM prints the very words that come out of his mouth (or tweet) are they "out to get him"?
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:41 am to Salmon
Obama was treated with kid gloves because he was "their boy". Obama's transgressions were ignored, explained away or minimized.
Trump is attacked with glee because he dared to challenge their world view. His transgressions are fabricated (sometimes), sensationalized, and exaggerated.
To indicate anything otherwise is to be highly partisan, willfully ignorant or just plain disingenuous.
Trump is attacked with glee because he dared to challenge their world view. His transgressions are fabricated (sometimes), sensationalized, and exaggerated.
To indicate anything otherwise is to be highly partisan, willfully ignorant or just plain disingenuous.
This post was edited on 5/19/17 at 8:42 am
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:46 am to a want
quote:
When MSM prints the very words that come out of his mouth (or tweet) are they "out to get him
It's sad! you honestly believe this is the case.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:47 am to a want
quote:
Maybe becausez 98% of what he does in negative
/thread
I'm no Trump supporter or Obama supporter for that matter, but there's no rational person that truly believes that 98% of what Trump has done (which isn't much, frankly) is bad.
It's this kind of partisan bullshite that is killing this country.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News