- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CSP said in his presser last night that they planned on taking a QB in the first
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:00 am
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:00 am
Now whether that was Mahomes or Watson, we may never know, but don't be surprised if we take a QB at 42 or in the 3rd round. His comments confirm the rumors that we've been looking hard at QBs.
8
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:01 am to oncealurker
Or, alternatively, he wants everyone to think that.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:02 am to Fun Bunch
Exactly
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:03 am to oncealurker
I'm sure he planned for wr, rb, olb, ilb, dt...Basically every position. Doesn't mean he was going to force something. Can you link that cause I don't remember the context being as you display it?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:06 am to nolaandy
Mahomes was the pick at 11
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:06 am to GynoSandberg
No he didn't. He said it was a realistic possibility. Never did he say they planned to.
Was there a realistic possibility that you would have considered a quarterback today?
“Yes. I think being true to the board and looking closely at how you have players graded. I think that when you have two picks, you have a little bit of flexibility. We feel like we have a number of needs and we felt like we got a good start on addressing those today.”
Was there a realistic possibility that you would have considered a quarterback today?
“Yes. I think being true to the board and looking closely at how you have players graded. I think that when you have two picks, you have a little bit of flexibility. We feel like we have a number of needs and we felt like we got a good start on addressing those today.”
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:10 am to oncealurker
No question we were taking Mahomes. Which is why KC jumped us.
We were also taking Foster. Which is why SF jumped us.
We were also taking Foster. Which is why SF jumped us.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:11 am to blueboxer1119
quote:
No question we were taking Mahomes
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:12 am to oncealurker
If kizer is there at 42, any chance browns attempt to move up? Do they have the picks to do it?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:14 am to blueboxer1119
quote:
we were taking Mahomes. Which is why KC jumped us.
We were also taking Foster. Which is why SF jumped us.
Damn it. I hope the Saints find that bug in the war room or its going to be a long draft
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:35 am to Fun Bunch
Yeah, exactly, he knows his chances of getting the Defensive player he wants improves if someone jumps on a QB from 33-41.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:37 am to ghost2most
worth a rerun-
quote:
No he didn't. He said it was a realistic possibility. Never did he say they planned to.
Was there a realistic possibility that you would have considered a quarterback today?
“Yes. I think being true to the board and looking closely at how you have players graded. I think that when you have two picks, you have a little bit of flexibility. We feel like we have a number of needs and we felt like we got a good start on addressing those today.”
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:38 am to ghost2most
worth a rerun-
quote:
No he didn't. He said it was a realistic possibility. Never did he say they planned to.
Was there a realistic possibility that you would have considered a quarterback today?
“Yes. I think being true to the board and looking closely at how you have players graded. I think that when you have two picks, you have a little bit of flexibility. We feel like we have a number of needs and we felt like we got a good start on addressing those today.”
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:16 pm to oncealurker
No he didn't he said they were open to it if it was the right value
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:44 pm to oncealurker
Brad Kaaya with our second 3rd rounder
Any of our higher picks being wasted on a QB and I'll be livid
Any of our higher picks being wasted on a QB and I'll be livid
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:49 pm to oncealurker
Glad they didn't. There's no one in this draft worth even a second round pick. Teams like the bears and chiefs are just playing the lottery hoping someone hits. Odds are really against it.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:54 pm to oncealurker
They considered taking one. I believe that Mahomes was that one and it's no coincidence KC specifically jumped us to get him.
That said, with Lattimore falling I don't know if we would have went Mahomes anyway. Lattimore was 3 or 4 on their board. He would have been considered but ultimately I think we end up with the same pick.
It's also why we didn't trade back. When you have a top 4 player on your board sitting at 11 you take him unless it's a real ransom.
I also believe the Cards were taking Watson, which is why the Texans specifically jumped them.
And I don't know if it was Jax or the Jets, but one of them had to have been trying to jump in front of Chi for Trubisky.
That said, with Lattimore falling I don't know if we would have went Mahomes anyway. Lattimore was 3 or 4 on their board. He would have been considered but ultimately I think we end up with the same pick.
It's also why we didn't trade back. When you have a top 4 player on your board sitting at 11 you take him unless it's a real ransom.
I also believe the Cards were taking Watson, which is why the Texans specifically jumped them.
And I don't know if it was Jax or the Jets, but one of them had to have been trying to jump in front of Chi for Trubisky.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:57 pm to PhillyTiger90
Kizer in the second would be much less of a waste that Kaaya in the third (or anywhere for that matter).
I want Willis or Bashem, but I'd rather go Kizer and a third round rusher over them and Kaaya.
Or just skip QB this year.
Just don't take Kaaya.
I want Willis or Bashem, but I'd rather go Kizer and a third round rusher over them and Kaaya.
Or just skip QB this year.
Just don't take Kaaya.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 1:06 pm to msstate7
The browns have enough picks to do whatever they want
Posted on 4/28/17 at 1:35 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
Browns could basically only offer picks next year or a 5th this year to move down 10 spots in round 2.
They have no 4th round pick this year and all their ammo is from next year.
Unless they did something like this:
Cleveland gets:
42
103
Saints get:
52
65
Even with that, the Saints are winning that trade massively according to pick values.
They have no 4th round pick this year and all their ammo is from next year.
Unless they did something like this:
Cleveland gets:
42
103
Saints get:
52
65
Even with that, the Saints are winning that trade massively according to pick values.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News